FACEBOOK PREDATED HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL TO:

HOW CAN IT POSSIBLY BE LAWFUL TO ACT IRRATIONALLY WHEN YOU ARE POLICE? HOW CAN PUBLIC AGENCIES MADE UP OF CIVIL SERVANTS WHOSE WAGES I PAY:

Create a deface book about a person who is defamed by Phone.

The answer is that it is not lawful to create an absurdity nor is it to create policy which does not enforce the spirit and intent of Law. I remember, decades ago, phoning the Sooke RCMP or Sooke Police for the first time to report that a false complaint was probable from persons who were trespassing and clearing the screen of shrubs and trees between my acreage and an adjacent acreage.  Except for a narrow ledge, left at the East side of my property so the Palfry property would not erode, my land had literally been excavated down 17 feet at least. The adjacent home site loomed above my home and provided the "neighbors" an Ariel view ideal for stalking me to find a way to call  911 and exercise their mentally ill need for power.  Was Marina Reid  sending her tree cutter on to my property to get the trouble going? Did she feel that what was mine was hers and she would order my  land to be clearcut? The trespassers HAD phoned  911,  I was informed, but that without threats Police would not attend. Real law abiding Police should have arrested Marina Reid .

I was helpless, down the cliff where I was at my house in a hole, a site made to order for Wilfred and Minnie Palfry the original mental cases next door. The new mentally deranged  property owner next door expected Police backup to clear a frame, around her land, of removed vegetation which was growing on my land. On my land the ledge which was being denuded was on the only part of my land where an effective screen of brush and trees high enough to provide some privacy could be grown.  Marina Reid and her tree cutter were trespassing for the second time in three days, when I from my window ordered them to stop cutting and leave. Marina Reid called  911 and said she "felt" threatened, meeting the guidelines which the incompetent receptionist at Sooke RCMP had on day one laid out for her to follow.  { On the occasion of this second trespass when I called in to Sooke RCMP,  the next day, to investigate a complaint which had been made by a trespasser,  (From my upstairs window, I had seen a mental case on the phone laughing and exulting, possibly showing me what she was doing?),  the Police receptionist mindlessly canted that threats in this case, WERE  INTIMATED, not spoken, some how 'mentally ill intimated' to the mad and dangerous fool on the hill next door ordering her chainsaw massacre man to destroy my vegetation.} On the day of the second trespass, just after I saw the fool on the phone, several Police cars and four or more Police were quickly here and next door. What a thrill for all those the mentally ill.

That day the tree cutters were on my property a second time. From the house I ordered them to leave, they were cutting this screen of trees and brush. They had a trailer right on the creek bank to the right or East to give me that bottom of the hill in a urine and feces soaked trailer park experience. None of this has gone away.  It is easy to see, just drive in stop at the ditch, careful do not fall in, take some pictures.

   Check out the Topography. Are you seeing how I could not get at anyone next door up the bank even if I wanted to?

See how far from the street the Police must trespass  to get to the house where I stone crippled at the time am supposed to be a danger to the two person chainsaw gang on the hill.

 

 

THE DAY AFTER THE SOOKE MENTALLY ILL IN POLICE UNIFORM GROUP ARRIVED TO ASSIST THE MENTALLY ILL CUT TREES ON THE OTHER PERSON'S LAND GROUP.   I STARTED TO CONTACT AUTHORITIES LOCALLY FEDERALLY AND  PROVINCIALLY.

I phoned in to the local RCMP and I said " Are you keeping a record of the fake 911 call as if it was a lawful complaint. Of course the Secretary told me . We have to keep a record of all allegations. You can keep a record of convictions but not of allegations, I said. Oh, but we do she said. {The policy of the Sooke RCMP Detachment is of zero tolerance for any, well anything, even if it is imaginary. If some one will say they are in fear, Sooke RCMP will keep a record of it to assist in their Warrantless Raiding Program and will send the information anywhere it could damage the victim of the fake  911 call to punish that person. "People must have good reason" to exaggerate and imagine and try to get a swat team onto a person who poses no danger to anyone, said Sooke RCMP Constable Champagne musing about why falsity is supported.  Wow my ex-wife's and Marina Reid's and God only knows whose insane dreams can be made real !}

BEFORE DEFAMING ON FACEBOOK WAS EVEN FIRST CONTEMPLATED SOOKE RCMP HAD "DEFACE BOOK"

SIMPLY CALL IN YOUR LIES AND THEY WILL COMPILE A DOSSIER AND CIRCULATE IT TO OTHER POLICE AND ICBC AND USA POLICE , EVEN THE   DOGCATCHERS WILL ARRIVE WITH A SWAT TEAM . ONE MORE 911 CALL AFTER YOU SET UP A FEW COMPLAINTS, IT IS EASY.

INDIVIDUAL TARGETING FOR FAKE TELEPHONE CALL VICTIMS. PLEASE HAVE A WOMAN MAKE THE CALL AND IT SHOULD BE A COMPLAINT ABOUT A MAN.      911 or Sooke Police or RCMP or Animal Control, ah oh!, will also take a call about a man's dog and still send SWAT.

Two Solitudes: HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL TO BE UNACCOUNTABLE

TWO SOLITUDES: THE SEPARATE WORLDS OF LAW OFFICERS AND CITIZENS

 I am an artist and a composer which means I remember really well and in my mind the memories run as movies with sound and observations recollected.

 

I do compare this and that and what and where and now and then to the point that "No one wants to hear", that is unfortunate, I hear and understand other person's intellectual constructs. 

To get to the gist of this post get ready for comparison and dissection and motivational elucidation. When Police or By-Law or Provincial Constable and Inspector and  Conservation Officer and even some jerk from the City of Victoria who managed City Properties arrive on my property I am supposed to completely defer to them and heaven help me if I utter a word that could be misconstrued. In addition any mistakes or intentional criminal acts that the Law officers including lawyers perpetrate will be overlooked even if they are documented and sworn before the courts.

On October 3 1996 Police took me from my home at Otter Point based on the sworn statement of Fritz Verhooven of Edward Kenney Bray which he admitted under oath in BC Provincial Court that he could not utter in Provincial Court nor swear to the veracity of his statement to Vancouver City Police which was false and criminal in intent. I demanded Verhooven`s immediate incarceration .

I had danced extensively during periods of recovery from Tonic Immobility and other injury and I would carry an amplifier on my shoulder into a music venue but never again after I was encased in chains and left in an un-ventilated seatless unheated Sheriff Van for four hours at Vancouver International Airport. I had been in Provincial Penitentiary for three days before this torture.

RCMP Misfelt or the blonde cop whose boyfriend grew pot it was said, a real head twister, Hartwig , a working Sooke Police RCMP I think the latter, when I said that the frozen cold cement box with a steel door in the basement of the Police Station created conditions which were causing spinal symptoms I would not tolerate but would immediately treat with heat and which were likely destroy my ability to dance and perform on harmonica and she said : `` You are being punished``

I WAS NOT GUILTY OF ANY CRIME, RCMP  PUNISHMENT OF MYSELF WAS A CRIMINAL ACT AS I WAS KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY SUBJECTED TO FALSE IMPRISONMENT UNDER HORRIBLE CONDITIONS WITH THE INTENTION OF CAUSING DAMAGE.

The document that was used to imprison me was forged by RCMP then Corporal Hal Zeike. The Head or Chief or what Officer at Wilkinson Road Prison told me so. He did not want to be a criminal too, but many RCMP and Politicians too will not denounce Law Officer crime but are accessories in fact and in law to the not investigated nor remedied Law Officer crime.

NONE OF THE CRIMINALLY OFFENDING LAW OFFICERS HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED, ONE CARELESS WORD TO THESE CRIMINALS AND I WOULD BE INCARCERATED. TWO SOLITUDES, DIFFERENT WORLDS.

                  More about when and why I collapse: 

I viewed CNN this morning where "Rescue Collapse" was explained by a doctor. In a stress to death or similar situation the body responds with adrenalin  and increased heartbeat and this keeps the body going. This is how I stand without support at first when the goons, whether trespassers or Enforcement invade my property and threaten with their hair trigger tempers and micron thin skin and they are "always in danger". Can the reader grasp the depth of the insanity of the intruders?     CRAZY PEOPLE WHO WILL TRESPASS, FAKE 911 CALL AND COME TO MY HOUSE IN FORCE WITH GUNS ARE TERRORISTS,  THEY ARE TERRIFYING.

When the terrible situation has ended the body stops responding and the heart rate slows and the heart can even stop. I have reported convulsion and collapse after enforcement or trespassers have left and I was always slightly puzzled, now  I know why this has occurred many times and at many times. I have stated: The fake 911 callers are trying to kill me. Terror reigns forever at the place that they have blighted and cursed as they exercised their hatred.

                                                   

 

PREVENTION: HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL

PREVENTION: That seems to be a good idea. Stop dangerous and damaging events from happening. Broaden the nature of prevention and the categories of the dangerous and the damaging and stop more bad things from happening. Categorize some citizens or their property or projects as; well let us simply put those people and properties and projects into a MUST BE PREVENTED designation. 

 

The methodology of prevention is continuing confrontation, intimidation and invasion of homes and property; citizens are badly psychologically damaged by elected representatives, authorities, civil servants and enforcement officers as their demeanor, statements and actions destroy all confidence in and all faith in the obtaining of a just outcome. When there is no evidence of a serious danger and the powers of prevention are unleashed on a citizen a property or a project the only danger is and damage caused is by the exercise of punishment to achieve prevention. Rather than being prevented from being a danger or injuring someone or doing damage, some persons are badly damaged by the punishments inflicted as profoundly disturbed authority callers and civil servants unleash their toxic agenda on citizens who have not damaged anyone or anything nor do endanger anyone or anything.

 

Citizens and the economic viability of properties are easily damaged by contrived charges and fines and prejudices arrived at without evidence or due process. Take home pay and particularly disposable income, if there is any from rental businesses, are diminished or eliminated by fines  and the loss of revenue from contrived administrative punishments such as "Entire Building civil servant ordered Evictions". Why must law abiding citizens bear the costs of bogus enforcement procedures and the terrible fear and anguish created by being chased off of or dragged out of ones business or home despite scrupulously obeying laws and regulations to avoid that intervention?

 

Projects are even more fragile.  Just one "Shut Down" can permanently end a project and repeated 'punishment by intervention' actions are intended to do just that despite the necessity for and benefits of most projects. Projects are not undertaken by property owners to damage anyone or anything nor to endanger anyone. Project owners do not need the supervision of hostile neighbors or toxic By-Law and Police enforcement. Project owners want to improve their property;additionally, the supervision and demands of banks and insurers are very stringent and comprehensive. Projects should be subject to regulation only if some effect of a negative nature which is real, not imaginary impacts other property and persons. It is hampering to try to curb or end projects, all hampering is malfeasance and thus it is criminal.

  

CAPRICOUS JUSTICE: COSTLY AND DAMAGING

Capricious Justice is a short description for a long hard road which is the path that I have had to travel through Canadian Society and even out here at my rural acreage,  Fifty Kilometers from the city, Twelve Kilometers from the nearest town. I have had my property repeatedly invaded by trespassers, by-law officers, British Columbia Special Provincial Constables and Police. The result of repeated unnecessary and fabricated interruptions is that my personal productivity is severely reduced. I am forced to be vigilant at all times when I should be able to kick back and relax at my rural acreage. I was employed or attending University every week of every year from the age of 16 on. I had been injured at work at the Canadian National Railroad and I was injured in two motor vehicle accidents a few years apart, there was nothing I could have done to prevent my being injured in the accidents. I was a passenger in the motor vehicle accident in 1970 which ended my ability to work for five years and in order to reduce liability an insurance company lawyer had me declared accident prone. In 2017 surely there is no one who could believe that there was some affinity between being injured in accidents caused by other people and somehow being "prone" to being in accidents. Ever since then I have been unemployed or struggling at self employment and worse forced to work at my wife's business without being paid and then I had to pay her business loses with money I inherited. The loss of productivity and earnings does not affect just myself. It also affected my children, persons who might have been employed by myself, and the Government of Canada which does not receive revenue in any significant amount from persons who are unemployed or under employed. 

 

Capricious Justice, that would be the irrational use of Police, By-law Officers and other enforcement personnel in a manner which protects no one, does not protect any property, does not protect the natural environment but is the use of the power of the Crown to intimidate or dis- accommodate or to unsettle someone. Those purposes are not a lawful use of enforcement. 

THE COST OF UNNECESSARY TRIPS BY ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS THIS FAR FROM THEIR JURISDICTION IS VERY HIGH. A SINGLE BOGUS ENFORCEMENT CALL CAN INVOLVE THREE JURISDICTIONS AND OFFICERS FROM ALL OF THEM GENERATE EXPENSES WHICH DEPLETE TAX REVENUES. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT MOST OF THE MONEY FROM MY PROPERTY TAXES IS USED TO PAY POLICE, BY-LAW AND THE MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL EMPLOYEES. UNLESS YOU ARE  IN THE HABIT OF SWATTING YOUR NEIGHBORS MUCH OF YOUR TAX MONEY IS WASTED. 

 

WHY DOES MY GOVERNMENT REPRESENT ITS SELF TO ME THROUGH SURLY MENACING THREATENING CIVIL SERVANTS AT MY APARTMENT BUSINESS IN THE  CITY OF VICTORIA AND AT MY RURAL ACREAGE ? 

 I will admit that it is necessary to have Police Protection and the regulation of By-laws. That necessary protection particularly when it comes to By-law enforcement should require that one would be engaged in an activity that was damaging someone's  property or damaging the environment or wild life. Forests and Wetlands must be protected. But its a priority with me to protect the Forest and the Wetland and the animals who live here. I abhor damaging other persons property or even the damaging practice of triggering enforcement against other persons. 

Every time I have required the protection of the Crown in anyway I have been denied, dismissed and disregarded. I would follow all of the procedures required, for instance in a case of a gross violation of the British Columbia Water Act which seriously damaged a water course and some of the only flat usable land on my property. More than ninety percent of my property is composed of steeply sloping forest and a equal amount of peat bog wet land.

I am not ever able to obtain a protective response and instead I am attacked with bogus complaints, defamation and even raids and invasions of my property and false imprisonment. NONE OF THE DRAGGING ME OUT OF HERE OR RAIDING HERE RESULTED IN A CONVICTION.   I find my self being referred to complaint commissions ; I thought those would be for persons who had been convicted and had not been treated correctly. The simple demand for enforcement and protection of a sensitive and heavily populated by animals Forest and Wetland should suffice to get the job done. Enforcement Officers arrived many years ago in response to my letters which at that time were being sent to British Columbia Provincial Cabinet level officials and chided me "Don't you be telling us how to do our jobs".  It might have been that time or another time that a Conservation Officer said " This Watershed is not worth saving" about Larulla Creek, a Salmon Enhancement Watershed tributary to King Creek.           

 

 

 

   

LAW ABIDING BY NATURE

IT IS NOT IN MY NATURE TO OFFEND.  I AM NOT ANXIOUS TO HARM ANYONE OR TAKE THEIR PROPERTY.  I AGREE WITH THE ENTIRETY OF THE PREMISE THAT EVERYONE BENEFITS FROM A PEACEFUL LAW ORDERED SOCIETY.  

Men much like myself have produced laws and rules for hundreds of years and have crafted a code of conduct. I concur. Criminal Police enforced Laws are meant to do with the prevention of and the punishment of acts which cause egregious harm to persons or property. 

THERE WAS NO INTENTION BY THE LEGISLATORS TO EMPOWER  UNEVEDINCED AND UNWARRANTED USE OF POLICE AS AGENTS OF PUNISHMENT.   THE PERSONS WHO EXAGGERATE OR FABRICATE COMPLAINTS TO AUTHORITIES TO PUNISH AN INNOCENT PERSON ARE CREATING EGREGIOUS HARM THE FALSE COMPLAINTENTS ARE CRIMINALS.

A TERRIBLE FLAW IN THE MODERN INTERPRETATION OF POLICING IS THE RETENTION OF FALSE AND FABRICATED COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE VICTIM          OF THE FALSE INFORMING OR DELIBERATE CONSTANT CALLING IN FALSE COMPLAINTS DESPITE THE VICTIM'S INNOCENCE. 

Elected officials say they do not interfere with Police but the falsely accused should not be dumped into a complaint process for criminals where Police declare complaintents hostile and dangerous and try to punish the victimized person  and raid in force saying that Police are in danger. 

Police do not want to act to apprehend the serious offenders who falsely inform Police, commit perjurious acts making false phone complaints and are targeting and stalking another person, which is the serious offence, criminal harassment. Police consider the complaints as against them, will not cough up the false informers identity and will not investigate themselves.  

POLICE CLAIM THEY ARE ENDANGERED BY VICTIMS WHO POSE NO DANGER DEMANDING A LAW ORDERED SOCIETY FREE FROM PUNISHMENT AND DEFAMATION THROUGH THE USE OF FALSE INFORMING AND EXAGGERATION      BY PERSONS WHO ARE  IN NO DANGER AND DO NOT NEED POLICE PROTECTION.

Feeling Allright at My 12 Acres in the Forest at Otter Point BC. No I Am Not!

I was standing in the Sunshine at the Edge of the Forest, for a Moment I Felt that long lost Feeling of Contentment, quickly it faded, I became Totally Alert.

                                                         

Totally Alert can be a fine feeling but not coupled with feelings of fearfulness and apprehension :    A DREADFUL FEELING OF IMPENDING OVERWHELMING UN-REBUTTABLE AND OVERPOWERING INTERRUPTION WHICH COULD ARRIVE AT ANY MOMENT.

I have been dragged out of right here, 5 days Jail to Prison to Jail. I was chained up in a Sheriff Van for 6 hours without heat and air. I was in convulsion.

How horrible is it when Police or Magic Police intervention occurs, Terrible. I have been crippled for years as a result, unable to leave the house, immobilized.

                                      

Invasion of my property was contrived on February 24 this year and again on June 6, 2017, & 40 other times, as I have not ever been convicted of anything as a result of all those intimidation raids and investigative raids, what it means is that   The Raids were False Raids.

It does not matter, on purpose, by accident, in error, I am still subject to months or years of virtual paralysis after a collapse post raid and on knowing I am all alone and there are so many motivated local and paid opponents. I am refused all knowledge as to who made an accusation, was it enhanced to generate a raid, who turned the what, 911 call, I do not ever get to know, to a serious accusation? How do Police et al get on to my property as a result, right away or a month later or three days later, how is the complaint leveraged and by whom. 

I do not get told a thing by Freedom of Information about Who?

I know what and probably Why I am attacked til I collapse. Nobody seems to care, everyone thinks I must have done something, no it has been an involuntary conflict, unwarranted.

                

                                                                

Liar representing John Horgan uncovered.

I WAS REVIEWING MY COMMENTS ON NOTES MADE  ABOUT A VISIT TO JOHN HORGAN'S CONSTITUENCY OFFICE IN 2010 :

I HAVE A CINEMATOGRAPHIC MEMORY WHICH MEANS VIDEO AND SOUND TOTAL RECALL.   MY NOTES CAN TRIGGER THE NOTICE OF FACTS WHICH ARE NOW KNOWN TO BE OF DIFFERENT IMPORT AS I HAVE NEWLY LEARNED LAW, ETC.

I posted about notes taken on visiting John Horgan's constituency office in 2010. I was suspicious of the snotty constituent office manager, I now know she was abjectly false while posing honesty.

I was desperate to stop the pounding on myself and I asked for Horgan`s help. You can read the blog where the MLA is not responsible for anything, try the other politicians, deflect, deflect.

I think I failed to mention the British Columbia Special Constables to John Horgan`s Constituency Office Representative. She knew that most of the actions I required help with were inflicted upon me by British Columbia Special Constables. The constituency office manager of John Horgan had worked for the ATTORNEY GENERAL, so she knew where the British Columbia  Special Provincial Sheriffs were commanded and mandated. She was clear and aggressive in her  "John not on duty, no not John", but she if she worked for the Attorney General she would know that the British Columbia Special Constables were under AG authority, correct me if I am wrong. I am sure. That is Provincial.       This has to be mental defect or a LIE.     I bet she thought obfuscating was really clever but what it is is a big fat LIE made on behalf of John Horgan and he is fully culpable as I notified him of this.

John Horganès Constistuency Office Representative, if she worked for the Attorney General, had to be sworn. I ask her: Do you remember the oaths you signed liar.  I signed oaths too, even to agree that capital punishment was possible for dereliction of duty, even negligence. The oaths are not un-signed, they remain in force, especially if you continue in government. John Horgan office manager is and was sworn and took oaths and she broke those oaths while failing her duty to me and serving John Horgan.  Those political creatures take orders.  John did tell her to act like this, don`t upset Police or Special Constables , oh no , break your oath, say I am not responsible, don`t conflict with any Law officers, love CRD POLICE, lawyers contribute, hey what, I want to puke.