Wednesday, September 12, 2018

HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL TO GET MARRIED TO GET DIVORCED?

AT VERNON BC IN 1977 I ENTERED INTO A MARRIAGE CONTRACT.  FIFTEEN MINUTES LATER I WAS TOLD         " I WILL BE HAPPY WHEN I GET MY  DIVORCE ''

I had just said to the former "Betty Dash" or "Trixie Dashevsky" " Are you happy now, you are pregnant and married, your mother should be happy". I think that my ex-wife not only got married but got pregnant to get money. I do not know what her real name was, she called herself Betty Dash but I saw a birth certificate that said Trixie Dashevsky. My ex-wife paid no attention to Law.  Men were subject to a myriad of laws and restrictions but many women felt that they were not bound by those same laws.

 

I had to put everything aside to support and house my wife and children. I was required by law to continue to support my children and if a divorce was negotiated, pay my wife a large sum of money eventually if she had participated in creating such assets but Trixie had contributed nothing, not even house work. I had no intention nor motivation to end the marriage, I had children to support, house and care for.  Betty or Trixie had been transported with joy at the prospect of having children before we could afford to have children. I realized the seriousness of the requirement to support and house the family. My ex-wife either did not care or did not believe that poverty for all of us would be the result of deliberately exacerbated legal process, a divorce for no real reason, but to enrich herself and impoverish me as a punishment which she could mete out to me.

 Marriage contract and rationality were thrown aside when Betty thought the house was finished, my ex-wife moved in and said  " You hate us why don't you just go. Just go!" and announced that  " This is not going to be a good marriage". Betty Collard additionally and crudely said she would not be a sex partner nor clean nor cook, trying to alienate me out of the house I had financed and finished partly, which was  not mortgaged.

 

 With the first house, because I could as far as I had experienced become disabled at any time I gave up all spending for a decade to be able to have a safe mortgage free home for the family.  I had owed $30,000. on the first house here at Otter Point which I had finished or rescued from dereliction but I HAD THE JEWELLERY INVENTORY AND GOLD AND SILVER TO PAY THAT OFF PARTICULARLY  BECAUSE THE  GOLD PRICE HAD GONE UP SO HIGH.           I had a job selling Volvo Automobiles in Victoria, I could have qualified for a mortgage renewal.  

 

By June 20 1980 the inventory was stolen and ruined when the house was burned and I had to pay to build a new house out of the insurance proceeds which took everything including what was paid for possessions, mostly my stuff. In addition I lost my jewellery equipment and models which were valuable, productive and had taken some time to produce.  I was devastated at the loss of everything I owned.  I still had to support and house the family while my ex-wife wanted to sabotage me. I  needed a house for my children and my wife and myself to live in and divorce would make that impossible. It was always my intention to not owe and make payments, if I became disabled how could make the payments? 

  My ex wife had the opposite idea from the marriage contract requirements which were equally binding and reciprocal, and when I got married in 1977 I still owned my property it was not half hers, not even after the 1978 division of assets law. It would take years of marriage to get half.

Trixie had an idea that a real estate agent had put forth: 2000 square feet contractor built and the real estate agent could sell that house. She would force me out and sell the house. (She clearly proposed that in writing through her lawyer Tyler Lucchies a second time in 1991.) In 1981, Betty thought she could divorce me and she would get the house and sell it and that would be her money. If you fight this she said, you are ripping your children off. Betty knew she was entitled to nothing but she knew about lawyers who would be happy to take legal and illegal action for her to get even with me by my losing everything to legal fees and to her.

 

LAWYERS WOULD TAKE ACTION TO RENDER MY FAMILY HOMELESS AND THEY WOULD BE HAPPY TO TAKE ALL MY MONEY. WHAT KIND OF MONSTERS ARE THESE PEOPLE. THERE WAS A VICTORIA LAWYER COCAINE CULTURE IMMORALITY AND FALSITY. ONE OF THE CROOK LAWYERS SAID YEARS LATER "THIS IS JUST A GAME, YOU KNOW", A GAME FOR MY EX-WIFE  AND THE LAWYERS AND MY MONEY ALL GONE FROM CRIPPLED ME AND WHAT OF THE THREE CHILDREN.  HOW COULD ANY RATIONAL AND ETHICAL HUMAN BEINGS NOT CARE ABOUT ABSORBING ALL OF THE SUPPORT STRUCTURE OF A FATHER WITH THREE CHILDREN TO SUPPORT? 

 

WHEN I GOT MARRIED I WAS NOT TAKING ON A BOSS OF ME, MY FAMILY AND ALL OF MY ASSETS.  I WOULD HAVE NOT EVER HAVE ENTERED INTO SUCH A CONTRACT, NOT EVER.  I ABHOR SUBJUGATION.

                     


THERE IS A LACK OF RECOGNITION THAT ANY GETTING TOGETHER AND COOPERATING TO BRING ABOUT AN UNLAWFUL OUTCOME IS A CRIME, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.

A MOST HEINOUS CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY IS THAT WHICH SEEKS TO HAMPER ANOTHER PERSON OR TO DESTROY AN INDIVIDUAL OR TO FORCE A PERSON TO UNDERTAK...