POT LAWS BROUGHT INFORMING, VIOLATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS AND SEIZURE OF CITIZEN'S LAWFULLY OWNED ASSETS INTO CANADIAN CULTURE

NORMALIZATION OF SEIZURE  OF ASSETS MADE MANY PERSONS FEEL THEY COULD TAKE OVER OTHER PERSON'S PROPERTY.

The Divorce Laws followed the Pot Laws' seizure of assets to a new radical and damaging degree and ease of implementation. A Man could injure no one, work hard, take nothing for himself or his personal pleasure and be subjected to a worse financial outcome than that of an irresponsible wastrel.

The Divorce Seizure Laws followed the Drug Law Seizure Protocols seizing property which was not contraband nor damaging anyone. Police and Divorce Lawyers and their clients were out to seize anything and everything they could get their hands on. It is terrifying to be a moneyless property owner being targetted.

My wife bragged that her Lawyer Tyler Luccies had taught her how to use the Police to terrorize me into selling my home so she and her lawyer could claim that the difference between the purchase price and the present value of my property was income and there is a lein on my property to try to do this. 

She was already appeased with $135K then $9k then $7700 then $35K and then $115K all of which I objected to. I knew she was entitled to nothing ever by law. She accomplished everything with threats to cause trouble. 

Years after the divorce she said `` See, it would have been cheaper to let me spend whatever I wanted to``. ( That is not so, I was totally spent long before she left, Some of my future inheritances were spent by her and my Mother and Brother diverted the rest. They made a deal to ``Take me down``.)  Despite this my ex-wife on the advice of her lawyer Tyler Luccies was using the Police to get money

THERE WERE UNIVERSALLY CONDEMNED AND DESPISED BURGLARS.

BURGLARS VIOLATED PROPERTY RIGHTS, TRESPASSING AND STEALING. THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO INVADED PRIVATE PROPERTY WERE CRIMINALS. THE POLICE WERE NOT KNOWN TO TRESPASS.

THE POT LAWS ALLOWED WARANTLESS RAIDING BY POLICE, THE WRIT OF ASSISTANCE WAS AN ALL PURPOSE WARRANT.

I KNOW THAT YOU HAD TO BE COMMITTING OR HAVE COMMITTED AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE TO HAVE POLICE RAID YOUR HOME.  

POLICE WOULD HAVE TO CONVINCE A JUDGE THAT THIS WAS THE FACT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. PERHAPS THIS PROCESS WAS NOT ADHERED TO IN THE PAST BUT IT WAS NOT KNOWN TO BE WIDESPREAD IN CANADA. 

THE POT LAWS CHANGED THIS NEED FOR A WARRANT TO RESPOND TO AN ACTUAL INDICTABLE OFFENCE TO THE WRIT OF ASSISTANCE SEARCHING FOR OFFENCES.

EVENTUALLY ALL OF THE POLICE AND ALL OF THE DOGCATCHERS AND OTHER CIVIL SERVANTS BEGAN TO ACT LIKE THEY ALWAYS HAD A WRIT OF ASSISTANCE AND TRESPASSED AND SPYED ON CITIZENS.

THE FLIMSIEST PRETEXES WOULD BE ESCALATED INTO RAIDING OFFICERS TRYING TO KICK DOORS IN. THEN THEY WOULD SAY THE DOOR WAS OPEN AND THEY WOULD ENTER MY HOME AND SEARCH FOR THE PREMISE TO JAIL ME OR SEIZE MY PROPERTY.

WITHOUT TAKING ANY ACTION OF ANY SORT, THE FIRST INDICATION THAT POLICE WERE HERE WAS THE POLICE KICKING THE DOORS IN. THE FRONT DOORS ARE DENTED AND THE DOOR FRAMES ARE CRACKED.

THE POLICE WERE HERE OVER A DOG OR THE SNOW NOT BEING SHOVELED EARLY ENOUGH AT THE ROCKCLIFFE, MY APARTMENT BUILDING IN VICTORIA.

POLICE ARE HERE WITH TICKETS, BUT FOLLOWING THEIR DRUG RAIDING PROTOCOLS WHICH THE ANTI POT LAWS CREATED. THAT MEANS THEY WILL TRY TO GET IN AND SEARCH MY HOUSE.

THE NEIGHBORS ALSO TRESPASS AND LOOK FOR CONTRABAND OR SOME KIND OF APPARENT VIOLATION SO THEY CAN CALL POLICE.

THE VIOLATION SEEKERS LEARN TO SEND IN BY-LAW OFFICERS WHO FEEL THAT THEY DO NOT NEED WARRANTS OR EVEN A REASONABLE COMPLAINT. THEY WILL ACT ON THE TELEPHONED IN RAVINGS OF CRIMINALLY INSANE PERSONS WHO ARE SEEKING TO DO HARM.