CONTEMPORANEOUS

I have written about the "timing thing ", it is never the right time. When contemporaneous or upon discovery complaint or submission of evidence or invitation to view evidence proffers are not responded to there should be no way for it to be " too late ", not ever. When I raise the subject, damage to myself, my property and my prospects whether it was by force or in my absence or under color of law, there is no receptive audience  nor is there assistance from authorities and there is often an openly declared refusal to act or threat to act against me instead of the persons who did the damage.

Perhaps it is me myself, considered worthless, who cares what I think happened.

I wrote to authorities and submitted evidence such as photographs and accurate transcriptions of what was said to me, and somehow there was such bad dirt on me that there would be no cooperation extended.  No one would tell what it was that was said about me either. I have a theory based on some recently acquired information and contemporary political news. 

I am accused of being "Emotional" when I chastise and order off trespassers and harassers and speak and write about them in a most disparaging manner.    I am not being emotional I am communicating ice cold fact and opinion. 

My ex-wife communicated to Police and lawyers and other persons that I " Hated "  them and women. That is a female emotional motivation. I as a man was not emotionally motivated. In addition, I, a man who ran a business where he did most of the work, sold the business and bought and resurrected a derelict looted while under construction house where he did most of the work  and moved his family in and then paid for and remedied a second home for his family was busy working, was not hanging around brooding and hating. I also smiled a lot so when the Bi-Polar thing first came along our RCMP shrinkies adopted it and labeled me "Manic". RCMP could see that I was always smiling and they could not add the " Depressive". My ex-wife said she would "wipe the smile off of your face" and ran all around saying I was discontented and angry to accomplish that.  IT IS ALL REALLY NUTS.

I complained about or submitted evidence contemporaneously in the Environmental Appeal Board and the Supreme Court of British Columbia and all over the internet and in boxes of copies of letters sent to authorities since 1982 and til recently by e-mail and the he " Hates" prevails I believe still. I have had conversations, hard to prove, but the e-mails in some instances are damning or as I do declare, the produce of mentally ill persons who cannot or will not perceive what is and has happened. The he " hates " canard is from my ex-wife who invented it she said with  her lawyers advice. She declared to me, " I have told them you hate Police Lawyers and Women "  NUTS IT IS ALL SO NUTS.

IT IS NOT TOO LATE.  WE ARE CONTEMPORANEOUS, I DO REMEMBER AND I HAVE DIARIES WHEN  I DID NOT. IT IS TIME TO REMEDY MANY CRIMES FROM THE PAST NOW. PROTECTION IS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

                      NUTS , NUTS , IT  IS  ALL SO  NUTS