USA POLITICIAN SAID " THIS IS MOB RULE '' AND THOUGH I DID NOT AGREE I DID SEE.
Democracy has been lost in many ways into a manipulated crowd response and into crowd bullying of smaller groups and individuals. There is a lot of public input that is simply a negativist overpowering of individual will. There is a stamp of legitimacy placed upon those who win elections that overrules the will of individuals and groups for no real reason that I would accredit. The protection against a myriad of public nuisances and dangers is real and necessary . Protection to assuage fears or opinions or prejudices is catering to Mob Rule.
I object to the acquiescence to the will of Police and By-Law and Sheriffs which is widely practiced and IS DEMANDED FROM PERSONS WHO DO NOT ASCRIBE TO ACQUIESCENCE as they are competent to administer their affairs and property and will not damage anyone or their property particularly when the property is large, rural and screened by vegetation. Businesses are highly regulated as well and have insurance and mortgage company oversight and the businesses and their owners should not be subject to any unnecessary acquiescence to authorities caused by telephone callers who remain anonymous but who create a state of conflict with authorities.
If the activity on a property damages the surroundings or environment in a real manner then of course regulation is necessary.
When a person makes a disposition of property or capital if that property or capital is seized or diverted from the use the owner intended, as I recently wrote: ``by force or in my (ones) absence or under color of law`` and I would add by fraud or coercion or the creation of fear or declaring unworthyness or through defamation, this should not occur. Authorities should not refuse to act nor should they blindly protect the offending persons. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPERTY USE SHOULD BE PROTECTED, FREEDOM OF ACTION AND DISPOSITION SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO MOB RULE.
If the activity of an individual does damage to persons or property the actions taken by authorities are legitimate. If the activity of a person or group is disliked or characterized negatively that is no reason for authorities to act or raid or publish defamation against a person or group. The most egregious false motivation of authorities is through predictive negativity and declarations about what a person or group thinks or feels. As I wrote previously: Nuts Nuts it is all so Nuts.
IF A NUMBER OF NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES OR LAW OFFICERS ACT WITHOUT LAWFUL PURPOSE AGAINST A PERSON OR GROUP THEY ARE A MOB OF BULLIES THIEVES AND TERRORISTS. A MOB.
The lyrics of this video ``Vote`` are more about what is not democratic in our Society than a plea to vote.
