Friday, April 17, 2020

EVIDENCE BASED REASONING vs PRIVLEGE AND FEAR BASED REASONING

DEFERRING TO AUTHORITY AND ENDANGERED FEELINGS CREATES A FALSE REALITY WHICH DESTROYS THE REAL RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP AND PERSONAL FREEDOM AND SELF DETERMINATION.


What I want to talk about  is the incredible failure which is caused by the non evidentiary rights, powers and privileges based belief system that is damaging society, people and the planet. 


I have difficulty in  imposing reason upon events which occurred where damage was done to me or to my prospects or property and the clear and visible evidence is denied. I am subjected to a cross connected mess of overruling and entitlement and the absurdity of speculative fear or possible endangerment which persons who are thrusting themselves into the affairs of other persons think they can demand to assert to overrule all of the powers and privileges of ownership and escape responsibility and financial jeopardy on their part.


The strict legal interpretation of responsibility, particularly in the case of unnecessary or malicious actions, extends to individual and several liability without diminishment by apportionment. This means that all of the damages may be collected from each respondent and that the other participants, when they have the money or assets, and some do not, can be taxed with a large repayment on behalf of each respondent for the  damage that was done through their mutual, and even unbeknownst to others involved, actions. 


There is no Playing "Silly Bugger" or " Born Yesterday". When any person or group assumes a mantle of authority or presume to negatively affect another person or even to enter onto or to damage or to threaten or to jeopardize the quiet enjoyment of the ownership of the private property of another person they are also assuming the responsibility for and liability for any damage they do, individually, as a group or in a chain of actions manner. All parties can be made to assume responsibility for the actions of themselves and their accomplices and accessories who may not be capable of assuming their own financial responsibilities.


This responsibility extends to personal injury and loss of prospects as well. The contemporary affectation for the doctrine of " We deny without any evidence but purely as an obstructive technique" and through citing the imperative overrule of the self interest permitted under the Capitalist System. Personal injury and loss of prospects is a matter known best  and only by the victim of such loss. It is not a matter admitted known to the perpetrators of the damage as their denial of such attests to. There is no evidence to back a denial of responsibility for the actions they or their associates perpetrated unless they have witnesses or video tape  or diary evidence to back their denial of responsibility or even, absurdly, of the existence of the damage they have done to a living BREATHING COMPLAINING TESTIFYING PLAINTIFF.







THERE IS A LACK OF RECOGNITION THAT ANY GETTING TOGETHER AND COOPERATING TO BRING ABOUT AN UNLAWFUL OUTCOME IS A CRIME, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.

A MOST HEINOUS CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY IS THAT WHICH SEEKS TO HAMPER ANOTHER PERSON OR TO DESTROY AN INDIVIDUAL OR TO FORCE A PERSON TO UNDERTAK...