THINK I WAS A TRUE BELIEVER. I THOUGHT CANADA HAD A SEAMLESS AND NON DISCRIMINATORY JUSTICE SYSTEM. I HAD THOUGHT THAT IF ANY LAW HAD BEEN BROKEN AND DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE CROWN OR THE COMMONWEALTH OR TO A PERSON OR TO PROPERTY OR TO THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND THE EVIDENCE OR THE SIGHT OF THAT LAW BREAKING AND RESULTANT DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED BY ANY LAW OFFICER, THAT OFFICER WOULD BE OBLIGED TO ACT TO HELP THE DAMAGED PARTY BY LAYING CHARGES, REPORTING THE INFRACTION TO AUTHORITIES AND ASSISTING THE DAMAGED PARTY TO OBTAIN RESTITUTION AND REMEDY.

 

LINDON COLLARD TOTAL RECALL

I HAVE BEEN LET DOWN, IGNORED, DISENFRANCHISED, DISAPPOINTED.

I HAVE HAVE RECEIVED LITTLE OR NO COMPENSATION FOR MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH INJURY, A TINY FRACTION OF THE EQUIVALENT OF MY LOSS OF EARNINGS FROM THE RESULTANT UNEMPLOYMENT.

SERIOUS DAMAGE WAS DONE TO MY OTTER POINT HOMES, ONE WAS BURNT DOWN AND THE SECOND HOME SITS IN A DEVASTATED HOLE. MY PROPERTY WAS STRIPPED OF TREES AND SOIL, THERE IS A DAM STOPPING MOST OF THE CREEK FLOWS AND A 17 FOOT DEEP UP TO 100 FOOT WIDE DITCH BISECTS MY ONLY FLAT LAND FOR HUNDREDS OF FEET.

I TRIED TO START TO OBTAIN REMEDY BY LITIGATING UNDER THE WATER ACT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA  UP TO THE  ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CABINET.

THE RCMP AND BC PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS BEGAN TO TRY TO GET ME FOR SOMETHING INSTEAD OF ACTING ON OBVIOUS AND STILL VISIBLE DAMAGE DONE TO MY PROPERTY WHICH I TRIED TO REMEDY THROUGH LITIGATION. 

THERE HAD BEEN CRIMINAL OFFENCES COMMITTED ON THIS LOT A AT OTTER POINT PREVIOUSLY AND WHEN THERE WAS THE ARSON OF MY FIRST HOUSE THE RCMP IGNORED THIS GENERALLY ACCEPTED SOURCE OF SUSPICION THAT THE PREVIOUSLY CRIMINAL OFFENDERS WERE LIKELY TO BE RESPONSIBLE.

DEFAMATION AND FALSE ACCUSATION CREATE A BOGUS CHARACTERIZATION OF MYSELF WHICH FORMS A RECORD THAT DESPITE MY DISPROVING ALL OF IT IS USED AND ACTED ON BY THE POLICE. 

  

MY LAND AND MY BUSINESS AND I MYSELF WOULD BE IN MUCH BETTER CONDITION IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE ENFORCED.

IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE REALLY AND TRULY ENFORCED MY FIRST HOUSE WOULD NOT BE BURNED DOWN.

THE TREES WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SAWED DOWN AND TRUCKED OFF, THE SOIL WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN STRIPPED FROM MY ONLY FLAT ARABLE LAND.

MY HOUSE SITE WOULD NOT BE IN A FLOODING HOLE WITH A HUGE DITCH IN FRONT OF IT WHICH RUNS ALL THE WAY THROUGH MY ONLY FLAT LAND. 

IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE ENFORCED I WOULD NOT HAVE COLLAPSED WHEN SEVENTEEN PEOPLE CAME ON TO MY OTTER POINT PROPERTY NOR WHEN TWELVE PEOPLE OCCUPIED MY PARKING LOT AT THE ROCKCLIFFE TO FENCE ME OUT OF THE PARK ADJACENT TO IT.

I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD MY EX-WIFE SCRATCH AT MY EYES, WHILE SHE WAS INFORMING ME OF FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT WERE BEING SPREAD, IN THE COMMUNITY AND TO THE POLICE, AT THE HOUSE SHE HAD STRIPPED OF ALL POSSESSIONS AND LEFT YEARS EARLIER, WHICH CAUSED ME TO COLLAPSE. NOR WOULD MY BROTHER ANDREW HAVE BEEN ABLE TO STORM INTO MY HOUSE AND HIT ME IN THE CHEST WITH A DEADLY TAI CHI BLOW WHICH ENDED MY ABILITY TO PLAY MY MAJOR INSTRUMENT, HARMONICA. 

IF TRESPASS AND WARRANT AND JURISDICTIONAL LAW WAS OBEYED BY THE POLICE AND BY-LAW OFFICERS AND BC SPECIAL PROVINCIAL CONSTABLES I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO BE VIGILANT 24/7 THAT CRIMINALLY  HARASSING CIVIL SERVANTS WOULD NOT BE TRYING TO LITERALLY BREAK IN TO MY HOME IF I HAD A DOOR OR WINDOW UNLOCKED AS I WAS TRIUMPHANTLY TOLD COULD HAPPEN BY BOTH POLICE AND BY-LAW.

TRESPASS LAWS MUST BE ENFORCED.

THERE WERE ALWAYS NO TRESPASSING SIGNS AND THIS IS OBVIOUSLY AN ENCLOSED AND MAINTAINED SPACE. PERSONS COULD WANDER ON TO THE UNMAINTAINED AREAS AND NOT BE TRESPASSING BUT THE LONG DRIVEWAY AND OTHER INSTALLATIONS INDICATE THIS IS A PRIVATE ENCLOSED SPACE.

THERE IS A LOT OF DANCING AROUND LAW AND INTENT AND THERE IS A CRIMINAL FRAUDULENT ELEMENT TO PRETENDING THAT A HARMLESS VISIT IS BEING MADE, WHEN THERE IS MALICE IN THE HEARTS OF THE TRESPASSERS, AND THERE IS NO WARRANT TO EXCUSE THAT BEHAVIOR NOR TO FIND OUT WHO SENT TRESPASSERS BY PROXY WHEN THOSE TRESPASSERS ARE POLICE OFFICERS AND BY-LAW OFFICERS AND BC SPECIAL CONSTABLES. 

IF TRESPASS LAWS WERE KNOWN TO BE ENFORCED CITIZENS WOULD KNOW WHERE THEY STAND BEFORE THEY TRESPASS AND THEY WOULD NOT DO IT.

INSTEAD, THE POLICE HAVE MADE THE SERIOUS ISSUE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE QUIET ENJOYMENT OF PRIVATE PROPERTY A FALSE CHARACTERIZATION, AS IF THE PERSON DEMANDING THE ENFORCEMENT OF THEIR RIGHT TO THE QUIET ENJOYMENT IS ECCENTRIC OR ANGRY OR  HE IS HIDING SOMETHING.