A CROWN PROSECUTOR I COMPLAINED TO EARLY ON IN MY SUFFERING FROM FALSE ACCUSATION DECLARED THAT THE TESTIMONY OF A RESIDENT OF A PROPERTY OUT WEIGHED THE TESTIMONY OF NON-RESIDENTS OF THAT PROPERTY.

IT IS NOT RECOGNIZED BY POLICE HOW DIMINISHED THE RIGHT TO MAKE DECLARATIONS TO POLICE AND TO GIVE EVIDENCE IS WHEN THE COMPLAINANT WAS A TRESPASSER OR JUST NOT A RESIDENT ON THE PROPERTY OF THE PERSON COMPLAINED ABOUT. 

POLICE ALSO GRANT CREDIBILITY AND ACT ON THE COMPLAINTS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE SOMEWHERE ELSE OTHER THAN THE COMPLAINED ABOUT PERSON'S PROPERTY, AND THEY COULD NOT BE IN ENDANGERED BY A PERSON WHO IS NOWHERE NEAR THEM AND HAS NEVER EVEN UTTERED A WORD TO THEM AND DOES NOT KNOW THEM.

DELAY TACTICS ARE REWARDED. THIS IS NOT JUST NOR RIGHT. THE TACTICS AND THE PERSONS USING THESE TACTICS SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED AND PROSECUTED..

WHEN DELAY TACTICS AND COLOR OF LAW PROCESSES ARE USED TO ALLOW THE PERPETRATORS OF LOSS OR DAMAGE TO ESCAPE JUSTICE, THERE THERE SHOULD BE NO TIME LIMITS IN CASES  ATTEMPTING TO OBTAIN CIVIL REMEDY.