BACKROOM NEGOTIATION: IS THE ATROPHICATION OF LITIGATION TO DISCOVER TRUTH THE RESULT?

JUST NOW, THE CONCEPT CAME TO MIND THAT THE LEGAL SYSTEM, WHICH IN CANADA, PROVED TRUTH THROUGH  LITIGATION, HAS BEEN REPLACED BY A SYSTEM OF"DEALS" WHICH BENEFIT ALL OF THE LAWYERS FINANCIALLY AND WHICH DAMAGES THE PLAINTIFFS.

I KNOW THAT I, AS A PLAINTIFF REPRESENTED BY A LAWYER, WAS NOT IN ON THE NEGOTIATIONS TO FORGO MY LEGAL RIGHTS. I WAS NOT IN ON THE NEGOTIATIONS IN THE BACK ROOM BETWEEN JUDGES AND LAWYERS WHEN I WAS A SELF REPRESENTED PLAINTIFF EITHER, I CAN ASSURE YOU.

When lies and falsehood and defamation are used to create a background and disparage myself and my truthful evidence there is not a "deal" which will right this wrong. The not disproved "deal" overruled defamation then seems to be "real" and the falsehoods and fabrications are used over and over by anyone who accesses the lies and then uses them as "not disproved". I will post about some of these reuses and misuses of falsehood from the past on Lindon Collard Total Recall@blogspot.

When Law is researched and evidence is accumulated, Local and Provincial Authorities also overrule proof through litigation and instead rule on emotional or alleged community will or Privacy prerogatives and considerations. 

The end result is that the actually damaged person is characterized as over zealous, or as a crank or a harasser of innocent persons and authorities.

ALL THE "DEAL" NON LITIGATED JUDICIAL DECISIONS HAVE TO BE RE-LITIGATED NOW, REPUTATIONS AND HISTORIES OF ACTING HONESTLY IN CHARACTER MUST BE RESTORED.