PREVENTION: HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL

PREVENTION: That seems to be a good idea. Stop dangerous and damaging events from happening. Broaden the nature of prevention and the categories of the dangerous and the damaging and stop more bad things from happening. Categorize some citizens or their property or projects as; well let us simply put those people and properties and projects into a MUST BE PREVENTED designation. 

 

The methodology of prevention is continuing confrontation, intimidation and invasion of homes and property; citizens are badly psychologically damaged by elected representatives, authorities, civil servants and enforcement officers as their demeanor, statements and actions destroy all confidence in and all faith in the obtaining of a just outcome. When there is no evidence of a serious danger and the powers of prevention are unleashed on a citizen a property or a project the only danger is and damage caused is by the exercise of punishment to achieve prevention. Rather than being prevented from being a danger or injuring someone or doing damage, some persons are badly damaged by the punishments inflicted as profoundly disturbed authority callers and civil servants unleash their toxic agenda on citizens who have not damaged anyone or anything nor do endanger anyone or anything.

 

Citizens and the economic viability of properties are easily damaged by contrived charges and fines and prejudices arrived at without evidence or due process. Take home pay and particularly disposable income, if there is any from rental businesses, are diminished or eliminated by fines  and the loss of revenue from contrived administrative punishments such as "Entire Building civil servant ordered Evictions". Why must law abiding citizens bear the costs of bogus enforcement procedures and the terrible fear and anguish created by being chased off of or dragged out of ones business or home despite scrupulously obeying laws and regulations to avoid that intervention?

 

Projects are even more fragile.  Just one "Shut Down" can permanently end a project and repeated 'punishment by intervention' actions are intended to do just that despite the necessity for and benefits of most projects. Projects are not undertaken by property owners to damage anyone or anything nor to endanger anyone. Project owners do not need the supervision of hostile neighbors or toxic By-Law and Police enforcement. Project owners want to improve their property;additionally, the supervision and demands of banks and insurers are very stringent and comprehensive. Projects should be subject to regulation only if some effect of a negative nature which is real, not imaginary impacts other property and persons. It is hampering to try to curb or end projects, all hampering is malfeasance and thus it is criminal.