THE  CON     OH! OH! TOO LATE

Paul Ryan announced: If Comey had evidence of wrongdoing by Donald Trump why did he not come forward right away. The timeliness con, it is a constant refrain as justice delayed is denied. 

FBI chief Comey documented the events at The White House and statements of Donald Trump and his own statements I would deduce. He then sought advice from persons who were read in on his notes before taking on the POTUS.  I have been  documenting statements and events contemporaneously for decades. I have tried to instantly report wrongdoing as it was suggested by Paul Ryan that Comey should have done that, right away. All of my contemporaneous reports have fallen on deaf ears. It is a CON to do wrong and carp about the delivery or how long it took.

Donald Trump spoke at length to graduating military conning that the press was mistreating him. The wrongdoing of authorities and law officers is conned alike, the poor things are being picked on.    No one picks on the powerful like President Trump or any Police officer or By-Law officer  from my position, without being really worried about what the response would be.  I proceed only with irrefutable evidence and in great need of relief.  My efforts denied so far I would like to proceed now to rectify and restore the damage which has been done to me.

               OH! OH! the authorities will try to say:  TOO LATE

The Con

                                THE  CON                                  May 17, 2017

                                                                                                                                                                      The exposure of Donald Trump to scrutiny should teach us the workings and the effect of the Con.

The Republican Party in the United States is portraying their plan to tax the very wealthy less as a tax cut favoring all Americans. Government services and support for those unable to care for themselves would be curtailed as a part of the Tax Reform plan of Republicans in 2017. The tax savings to low income persons would be minimal to zero. 

I have observed Republican spokespersons touting the wonderful relief which the new tax plan would bring to alleviate the suffering of poor bewildered citizens caused by the  complicated forms which have to be filled out to pay graduated taxes with personal deductions and tax credits for low earners.

In Canada I have seen flat tax plans proposed for similar reasons by Conservative politicians.         The simplest , oh so carefree and easy, is to charge everyone the same percent on everything.        The sad part of this is that the low earners require the money they receive for food and shelter. 

 The property and businesses of high earning citizens require more of many government services to protect them and supply infrastructure.   Right Wing Politicians wish to enhance those Services and Agencies.  Everyone, proponents say,  honor the Police who protect our property and control the desperate citizens and the addicted citizens and the mentally unfit.  Are most of us conned?

  The truth regarding Police services being rendered to help citizens is that some citizens are declared to be beneath the law. The Police and other Law Officers tell me, for instance, that they do not care or will not do anything for me when I require the protection which I pay taxes to obtain.  Simply because I have been defamed and because I responded to unlawful treatment and acts by authorities with complaints, the entirety of the enforcement, legal and political community  treat me with complete disregard for my needs or the crime being committed which is damaging myself or my property and attack me instead saying that I am harassing the persons who have without evidence or provocation decided they can do damage to myself or my property and get away with it by lying to deploy Police against me. I am an educated property owner who can win a court case on his own, what happens to the poor renter or uneducated person who is subjected to this treatment. They are kicked out of their rental, or dispossessed of their property, jailed, criminal recorded and ruined by the authorities, and made to be  unemployable as well.  Watch out poor you are conned.

    

  

                      '' ALL I HAVE TO DO IS SAY ''

THERE IS AN ATTITUDE AMONG LIARS THAT "SAY" REPLACES "LIE"

The opening statement from my ex-wife was criminal, terrorizing and a complete overturn of the western civilization's value system: work and be rewarded. All I have to do is " SAY" she said and they will lock you up. I was so terrorized that I have not ever gone swimming again, shaking, fearful. All she professed liar has to do is   "SAY" or "LIE" and I am gone, my house , my car; she and her lawyer wrote about selling off my musical instruments. Was it he who told her that all she had to do is"SAY" and they would lock me up, Tyler Luccies of Stevenson Dole at the time? There are so many things besides swimming that I was terrified out of doing.

My lawyer Bernstien said that all Harold Turnham of Turnham Woodland Waddell Rupponi had to so was " SAY" as I pleaded my case against a lawbreaker, Turnham did say he had me surrounded with sheriffs as I was unmasking Turnham's lies. The judge Master threatened jail " If you continue to disparage Harold Turnham's  reputation  I will have bailiffs throw you in cells".

Sheriffs surrounded me, I collapsed. Turnham stunk like a junkie, on drugs? liar stink? what?

Combined with the criminal activity of jail threats is the propensity of the Police, By-Law to target anyone who they perceive as opposing their dominating agenda. No complaining about them , rat. 

The liars just have to " SAY" AND THE POLICE "SAY" TOO.

Police have said to me "We are coming anytime" and "If any doors or windows are open we are coming in". The snow shoveling was not to Victoria By-Law's satisfaction:  out here to Otter Point with two Police Vans. Kicking at the doors, coming in? I am 71 years old, wake up shaking , jump at every noise, I am visited rarely, I am totally isolated and collapsed on left side. All someone has to do is say and they will lock me up. I was  NOT GUILTY and Fritz Verhooven of Edward Kenney Bray admitted he had lied in the deposition which got me locked up in prison for five days. 

All he had to do "SAY"  and Sooke RCMP without warrant or juristictional legality picked me up on Friday afternoon on a long weekend and solitary confined me in a freezing concrete box, weekend so I could not get out of  JAIL  threats coming true . I was put in with murderers in Wilkinson Road Correctional Facility and then flown to Vancouver in a rickety plane over water, chained up ( Isis-like), with a huge waist chain, feet chained. 

The laughing Sheriff put me in an unheated unventelated van at Vancouver International Airport and I spasmed and convulsed until I was crippled and never the same and they are coming ANYTIME!    As Canada's law representatives they do this in your name, with your permission, representing YOU!  How can you not be revolted, motivated to control the use of your power?

CAPRICIOUS JUSTICE: By-Law allegations used to invade property: ...

                                Capricious Justice      April 27, 2017.

Police are granted limited access to the homes and property of residents and owners in case of life threatening emergency or when a judge signs a warrant. Criminal intent on the part of the resident or owner of property being invaded is required for the criminal process and warrant to be used. 

I cannot understand why the moronic device which is used to overrule Law is tolerated by persons who profess to possess extraordinary intelligence. The function of Law is to protect persons and property. The misuse of Law is to use Law to frighten, dominate, intimidate and endanger persons.

The moronic device is that when an infraction of a by-law is suspected, a citation is issued: the alleged infraction is often, invariably in my case, an alleged error of omission, a failure to comply with the often ridiculous and unsupportable interpretations the violation generating martinets espouse.  The citations used repeatedly to intimidate and assault with police, were ruled to be unenforceable and the alleged offence unproven whenever I could challenge in the courts.

The by-law officer becomes the relentless punisher, gathers up as many police or other goons as possible and heads out to violate the written and spoken orders of the property owner to stay off his property, to leave him alone, to find the legal way to serve the quack documents.                                      

           Juan de Fuca Land Use Committee:        Minutes of the meeting    January 21  2014
                                                              Lindon Collard statement at JDF LUC meeting.
                                     ZONING  LAWS MISUSED

 Municipalities and Districts have the power to regulate zoning and to control density and setbacks. The power to control most other aspects of the activity of business is not a Municipal power. 

When zoning requirements are used to control the nature of business or agricultural activity on property which is zoned so that the activity is permissible the Municipality is overstepping its powers and exercising unlawful control over property owners. 

I attended a meeting of the Juan de Fuca  Land Use Committee; at that meeting, January 21st 2014 I am quite sure that I said "Mr. Hicks, you are using your powers to change a setback to effectively prohibit the use of existing buildings located on agricultural zoned land which meet current setbacks", or words to that effect. Mr. Hicks stated that the increased setbacks would require a variance to use existing buildings which met current requirements. Mr. Hicks said, "We will throw it to the neighbors."  I replied that the neighbors always say no. 

I was making the case that zoning and setback powers were being used to effectively prohibit certain types business and agriculture for which land was zoned. There was no mention of my statement in the minutes of the meeting which I just noticed posted on a page associated with my name.   

I wrote a letter to the JDF Director about this zoning issue. 

MARIJUANA PROHIIBITION: CORRECTING THE MYTHS

　

MARIJUANA PROHIBITION: CORRECTING MYTHS          

I read a “Stop The Violence BC” article about marijuana prohibition. There have been numerous statements by every sort of authority and many writers of opinion pieces which claim that the gang violence we are witnessing in British Columbia is a fight over marijuana. Examine this premise logically. Marijuana is produced in BC and the gang related activity must be activity which results in the sale of large amounts of marijuana far from British Columbia. I am sure there is local distribution of marijuana but with production facilities located in every British Columbia town, where would the conflict occur over the large amounts of money gangs fight over. Where the marijuana is sold, if there was a surplus of marijuana, which I understand is not the situation outside of British Columbia, if there was a surplus, gangs might fight to maintain an exclusive market. This conflict if it does occur would occur far from production facilities.

There will be individuals who would steal from other persons, and this could be the source of some violence in British Columbia. Correct me if I am wrong but I don’t recall gang violence being linked with theft from means of production of marijuana. This is not to say that that doesn’t happen, its just that I’ve never heard of innocent victims being gunned down at the scene of a fight over theft at a marijuana production facility.

What do criminal gangs fight and kill for? Criminal gangs fight and kill for the control of incredibly more lucrative per pound and per transaction hard drug sales. The gangs are fighting over control of Heroin, Cocaine and Meth sales. Any of the gang related murderers appear to have been mostly in the Cocaine trade. Correct me if I am wrong.

There is another very important aspect of the prohibition of marijuana use. The prohibition of alcohol, the most widely known prohibition was not nearly as all inclusive or wide ranging as the anti pot laws. The brewing of beer for ones own use could be accomplished by buying a beer starter culture at the grocery store, adding water, letting the wort ferment and then enjoying ones own beer at home without fear of violent attack. Furthermore the production of wine was legal and one could consume ones own wine at home without fear of violent attack. Note: There were political enclaves, towns, counties and even states which had additional restrictions placed on alcohol production and consumption.

There were social clubs where under a variety of different exemptions members could gather and enjoy beer, wine and even hard liquor. Any club which had saved itself a supply of spirits could continue to serve them indefinitely and some private clubs had hard liquor enough to last the length of prohibition.

The laws against marijuana use prohibit any of the aforementioned personal or group enjoyment of marijuana even though the consumption of alcohol is more dangerous and debilitating. The marijuana laws reflect the new preoccupation by Prosecutors and Police with zero tolerance. While zero tolerance may seem reasonable, what it is is a systematic punishment without discretion for personal acts that harm no one. Zero tolerance is a brutal tool wielded by psychopaths given licence to commit acts of violence degradation and destruction by charlatans.

IN THE RESPONSE TO THE "HAVE TO INVESTIGATE" ARGUMENT

IN RESPONSE TO THE “HAVE TO INVESTIGATE” ARGUMENT

　

The “have to investigate” doctrine is a misinterpretation of Canadian Law which has the effect that while you are at your home or business, at leisure or at work anywhere you can be interrupted by the arrival of Regional District Authorities or Police and have to account for yourself or even be “found in contravention” and hauled off to a frozen cold windowless concrete cell, at any time. The proponents “have to investigate” could be sent to your home or other location by a phone call from an anonymous source. You or I could be selected for special attention for any number of reasons which are beyond control.

I have to address the arguments which are advanced that would enable the unlawful interventions against myself while I am on my own property which I find destroy my peace of mind, my enjoyment of my property and my ability to do work .

A test of what is reasonable and just is what would a reasonable man knowingly agree to willingly. The administration of justice is not to be an unknown factor . I am constantly subjected to unwanted and undeserved and unexpected interventions into my affairs where the property involved is unequivocatively mine . It is unlawful to enter onto another person’s property with the intent to do damage . To merely enter onto private property is not unlawful ; when you are told not to enter or your intent is to do damage or even to merely discomfit the resident or owner, then the entry is unlawful and is trespass or even a violation of the Criminal Code of Canada , an offence under the Protection of Private Property Act .

I find that the trespasses and destruction of natural habitat which have occurred at my twelve acre property at Otter Point BC are or were damaging and distressing . The reaction of the Capital Regional District was to always ignore calls to come to my property and view and document violations of various regulation or trespass which have damaged or are damaging my property and which are visible, not complained about, as gone now but had happened or would happen . The Federal , Provincial and Regional District officials and enforcement officers will ignore what is right in front of their eyes and call police and create documents and profiles based on alleged fears of future retaliation against persons who have created destruction or damage or are retaliating against me by fabricating complaints .

The continual triggering of Police and Regional District Authorities against me in response to my complaints about trespass and property damage has gone on for decades . The CRD have not ever protected my property , they state that this is their policy. They will not only refuse service to me but they will assiduously try to punish, provoke and criminalize me . They treat every noise complaint about any tenant or animal on my property or every allegation about what I must be doing as a justification to invade all of my properties in Victoria and out here at Otter Point as well . They attack me with bogus charges and of late collect fines by manipulating the situation so that no rebuttal of the allegations can be accomplished . Don Brown and Miles Drew and any of their staff or superiors I have met or contacted think that they do not need a warrant to enter onto my property , they think they can enter onto my land to “ have to investigate”. The CRD typically bring an entourage of police with them to accost me on my property and never ever even once have they arrived while anything was happening , it was always regarding some other time that a complaint is phoned in and they flood onto my property up the 160’ driveway and, in writing, they say that if there are any doors or windows open , they are coming in . What reasonable man would knowingly buy property to be subjected to such abuse ?   

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that it is not lawful to step one foot onto private property without a warrant, I have viewed the video taped proceedings on C.P.A.C. in addition, I have viewed the Supreme Court of Canada Justices' ruling that in is a stalking, criminal harassment offence to be visually examining ones neighbours property with the intent of informing authorities.

If you are truly being disturbed in a serious manner or you are actually in danger or your property is being damaged by the actions of persons on adjacent property's, you can call the Police or Regional Authority's to your home or place of business to observe the damage or annoyance which is afflicting you on your property.Don't think you can send them to another persons property. Just don't do it.