A NECESSARY PRECEDENT

THE PRECEDENT I NEED TO PROCEED MIGHT WELL EXIST IN CANADA . I HAVE TO DO THE LEGAL RESEARCH, AND TODAY AND MOST DAYS I COULD NOT DO IT. I AM PHYSICALLY ABLE TO DRIVE MY CAR, BUT ONCE I GOT THERE I MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO WALK AND CONVERSE AND READ, PROBABLY NOT AT THIS TIME OR LATELY. PERHAPS THERE IS MORE INFORMATION  ON LINE AND AT WEBSITES CONTEMPORANEOUSLY BUT EVEN THAT RESEARCH IF I HAD TO DO IT WOULD HAVE TO BE DONE IN RATHER SHORT SEGMENTS.

WHERE RESPONDENTS OR PERPETRATORS USE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF OR VICTIM  TO DEFEAT LITIGATION OR PROSECUTION TIME LIMITS DO NOT APPLY OR ARE NOT APPLICABLE.

Here is what I think is the really important part that I really like but the crook cops and crook lawyers will fight like hell and, tut , tut, you are not supposed to interfere in anything which would elicit more Truth here in Canada under Canadian Law.

WHERE PREVARICATION AND THE USE OF FALSE ALLEGATION OR THE MISUSE OF POLICE POWERS HAS DELAYED LITIGATION OR THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT , THE BURDEN OF PROOF SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE RESPONDENT. 

In the 1980's I went to Victoria and I had a meeting with the Chief Crown Prosecutor. I said " Several people will come onto my property and they will make a complaint to Police and Police believe them as there are more of them". "They can't do that."he said. In addition very importantly, the evidence of the solo resident or in my case owner as well of the property is to be judged credible and the statements of the mob of trespassers is to be disregarded. 

I had two accident claims to deal with in the early 2000's, and the word was out, lawyers would not represent me, Chris Bing, said he could not represent a person like me it would tarnish his Firm. I personally took up litigation which accused Prevarication and Collusion approaching the level of a Criminal Conspiracy and the mentally ill or drug addicted, he stunk like  some  street persons do, Harold Turnham of Turnham Woodland Waddell Rupponi had Sheriffs surround me in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. There were two in the Court but Turnham called in two more and he grinned and laughed and danced around pointing at me. The only collapse I had where I was not on my own property was when I was a self-represented plaintiff in British Columbia Supreme Court.

THE "REALLY PARALYZED"I AM EXPERIENCING TODAY WILL HAVE ME RECLINING WHICH I HAD TO DO MOST OF YESTERDAY, VIRTUALLY PARALYZED. THE TERRIBLE TONIC IMMOBILITY OR COLLAPSE IMMOBILITY  HAS BEEN EXTENDED AND MADE TO BE MORE DEBILITATING AND I HAVE SUFFERED SERIOUS LONG LASTING INJURY FROM COLLAPSING WHEN THE POLICE OR BY-LAW OR  SHERIFFS RAIDED AS A RESULT OF HOW PERSONS DEFENDED THEMSELVES AGAINST IMPENDING LEGAL ACTION. GETTING OUT OF TROUBLE FOR WHAT YOU DID BY SICCING THE COPS ON THE PLAINTIFF HAS TO BECOME AN ENFORCED AGAINST CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

Postscript May 9 2019.

The Precedent which I used in 2001 or 2002 may or may not be  a utilized Precedent as I had thought it was. Perhaps it was only myself, self represented that utilized it. In 2004 I appealed the dismissal and I hired Berntsen to represent me but I was going to be there. He, Dorgan and Turnham had a hearing the day before I was to be in Court and hopefully not able to be surrounded with Sheriffs as I would have a lawyer with me and that did not happen. Berntsen simply folded, he had written a few words on a piece of loose paper, I had requested his work product file.

 They did not surround me with Sheriffs when Peter Firestone represented me. He did his job well but I could never get the evidence of what the false allegations were that were lodged against me regarding my lawful recorded telephone messages to keep the Alf Toone COOP tenants he managed off of my property and to stop making Fake 911 calls as they stated ``bankrupt him and his Ferrari``.