Thursday, May 30, 2019

INFANTILIZATION

INFANTILIZATION WAS BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION BY CHRIS WILEY THE INTERNET PUNDIT.

Wiley was referring to how the internet service providers were deciding what people would see and what would be advertised to them and how personal information was used.

The process of taking over the decision making capacity of another person as if they were incapable of making the right or even a safe decision is predatory infantilization.

When the person who is being controlled as if they were an irresponsible child is dispossessed or punished the situation is one of egregious criminal exploitation.

People who are the subject of infantilization by others are said to have been "infantilized." Studies have shown that an individual, when infantilized, is overwhelmingly likely to feel disrespected. Such individuals may report a sense of transgression akin to dehumanization. This statement is from Wikipedia.


Infantilization is a tool for corporations and authorities to use to disregard the evidence and statements of citizens and to deny citizens their lawful rights to self determination and the rectification of damage done to them.


Injured in an accident: you have to get one of the Real Adults to vouch for you and if the Real Adults cannot or do not want to see what is clearly evident you could be out of luck. 


The process and abuse which is to send Law Enforcement to supervise persons based on unevidenced complaints and without judicial warrant is a a form of infantilization.


The process where the adult male is subjected to control by the adult female because he has to or suffer divorce and property loss is a form of Infantilization. 


Egregiously criminal and patently absurd is the process where a property owner in a relationship with a dependent can be Infantalized and controlled and even dispossessed when the responsibility and achievement of the property owner are obvious as they have achieved and maintained ownership of the property.

6 comments:

  1. I'll explain, well the first 5 lines anyway, the rest is opinion.

    All they wanted from your data was money. Many of us have understood this for a very long time. They were good at it. Ads would follow me around the internet, where they could, about stuff I had expressed and interest in. Perfectly fine but upset some people.

    Then we had the 2016 election and the subsequent madness, which among many other things blamed the internet for poor Hillarie's loss. ;) Both the Russians and the large social media platforms were targeted and now we have the platforms scrambling for some way to make the rule setters happy. The Russians are mainly worried about how to deal with such obvious massive stupidity.


    So government has come directly into control of social media, which has been a long time goal. I don't use it myself, well cat pictures on Instagram, but it has amused me for decades now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are totally dependent on "rule setters"

      Delete
    2. Its called the government. I guess that went by you.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well Snowden agrees with me. Hey I can even post a link.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

THE PEOPLE WHO WORK AT THE RCMP AND THE CRD RIP OFF THE TAX MONEY I PAY.

  TRUE LEFT I PAY AN INORDINATE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX. ALLEGEDLY A LOT OF MY $50+K/ANNUM TAX IS TO PAY FOR POLICE AND BY-LAW SERVICES. May ...