THEY SPEAK WITH ONE MOUTH

BRIBERY IS A HIGH CRIME. CONSTITUTIONAL US FOUNDERS CREATED IMPEACHMENT TO PREVENT BRIBERY FROM DAMAGING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

THE PERSON WHO SOLICITS A BRIBE TO AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF A GOVERNMENT BENEFIT WHICH THEY CONTROL IS THE PRIME MOVER IN A CRIMINAL ACT. THE CRIME IS THE CORRUPT AND HIGH CRIME `BRIBERY``.

The term "corrupt" comes to mind with thoughts of payoffs to government officials who serially demand recompense for favors or even just due process.

The most likely person to be involved in numerous acts of corrupt practice would be the government official who controls administrative permission or government funding of individuals or institutions or judicial administration.

THE CASE OF THE IMPEACHMENT OF US PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS SOMEWHAT PUZZLING AS THE ACCUSERS AND THE DEFENDERS DANCE AROUND WHETHER OR NOT A CRIME WAS COMMITTED.

It is obvious and testified to and  proven that Us President Donald J.Trump demanded the pretense of an investigation be announced into Hunter Biden and his Daddy which is a bit childish and a lot of " I want a big fat political smear against my rival for the US Presidency " in the form of an announcement that the Donald would tweet and rave about that the then leading Democratic Presidential Contender was right Close and Cozy with corruption from Russian Oligarchs

HOW CAN ANYTHING LAWFUL ENSUE AFTER CRIMINAL ACTS ARE PERPETRATED AND FALSE STATEMENTS ARE MADE TO AUTHORITIES ?

AUTHORITIES SUPPORT PERSONS WHO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMINAL OFFENSES AGAINST ME BASED ON FABRICATED COUNTER COMPLAINTS.

Why would the persons who destroyed watercourses and chopped a forest down and stripped the soil from my property be entitled to trespass and repeatedly send Police to my private property? Police files show support for them in writing.

 As I attempted to protect my property and remedy unlawful damage done to MY PROPERTY Police said I was an Environmentalist seeking confrontation. "Collard is an Environmentalist seeking confrontation and must be charged" is a Batshit Crazy entry in the Sooke RCMP files which I have from a Freedom of Information Reply. 

Much is redacted but I guess they thought that that the entry mentioned in the previous paragraph would intimidate me. It did, I struggled to remain active but I gradually gave up everything, I stayed at Otter Point terrorized into a state of Tonic Immobility after  innumerable raids and threats to sic the cops on to me. 

Many raids were by Dogcatchers and their Police Escorts. Female trespassers also got Police Escorts on to my Property which is Batshit Crazy Terrifying! I know they are nuts and will say anything, all of them, any of them. It is so dangerous as they flirt with getting me shot or thrown into jail for just two months and my ex-wife and the Authorities would seize my property at Otter Point.

After 2001, an additional irrational situation developed, Victoria  Police supported trespassers at my Rockcliffe Apartments and allegations were charged  about noise  made by my tenants in Victoria which were exaggerated as if action had to be taken to arrest me out here at Otter Point and the RCMP did raid and arrest and I was not ever guilty of any crime.

POLICE AND BY-LAW OFFICERS AND SHERIFFS SUPPORT OTHER PERSONS ON MY PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF LAW AND THIS IS BASED ON DEFAMATION WHICH HAS NEVER HELD UP IN COURT AND WHICH HAS NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE BUT COMPLAINTS.

Why do insurance company employees and their Lawyers have the intimidating and threatening support of Police and Sheriffs when they are invariably representing a person who has committed an offence. There is not some immaculate conception when the lies and rejection of the commission of a criminal offence is handed off to a representative. They are doing the same thing as a proxy which the lying offence committing perpetrator of even an "accident" is doing; they are avoiding responsibility for damage done by committing an unlawful act.

I CANNOT SAY FOR SURE IF AN INSURANCE COMPANY EMPLOYEE IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE ABSOLUTELY HONEST IN ANY STATEMENT THEY MAKE. I KNOW THAT THERE IS REGULATION AND LAW WHICH MAKES THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT LAWYERS MUST BE TRUTHFUL IN ANY STATEMENT THEY MAKE. 

That would be any statement including lawyers statements to each other and during statements made before the courts without the statement being part of another person's testimony. If it is a previously testified to lie there is the remedy of  perjury charges. If the lawyer is the first to broach the lie the matter is supposed to be adjudicated  BEFORE ANY PROCEEDINGS CONTINUE.

Bar Associations are supposed to remove the lawyers license to practice in any number of situations where lawyers are lying.

SELF SERVING BAR ASSOCIATIONS DO NOT ACT.

LYING LAWYERS ARE JUST DOING BUSINESS AS USUAL 

POLITIKROCKER " When it is your Head talking and it is saying the words it said when it was talking then you know you said that even if you claim to have a "Hole in your Head" Memory.

POLITIKROCKER FRAUD STATEMENT

LEGAL ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN IMMEDIATELY WHEN YOU OR YOUR PROPERTY OR PROSPECTS ARE DAMAGED

THE PROBLEM IS THAT OFTEN A LOT OF MONEY WILL BE REQUIRED AND A LOT OF HONEST COOPERATION BY AUTHORITIES AND LAW OFFICERS WILL BE REQUIRED. THEY DID NOT COOPERATE WILLINGLY WITH ME, NOT AS A CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILROAD  EMPLOYEE,NOT AS AN ENTREPRENEUR NOR AS A PROPERTY OWNER.

PERSONS WHO REQUIRE REMEDY FOR DAMAGE DONE THEMSELVES OR THEIR ASSETS ARE NOT LITIGIOUS OPPORTUNISTS, THEY WANT EVERYTHING PUT BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS BEFORE THEIR ASSETS OR PHYSICAL CONDITION OR PROSPECTS WERE DESTROYED BY NEGLIGENT OR CRIMINAL ACTIONS.

 

The Post below this one, published earlier, touches on Litigation back in the 60's and 70's which I assure you I was generally not pleased to have to go and litigate or to defend myself in many traffic tickets which I have been informed still goes on; Police are overly aggressively ticketing motorcyclists in 2019.

( When I was actually speeding, a year ago and several years back I paid the tickets. Often by launching a protest one can escape the fine and points, but that would not be honest and truthful, as I was speeding, so I could not do that. )

It is shocking how many damaging acts can be perpetrated, some of the acts constitute serious criminal offences, and Police and By-Law and Provincial Authorities hide offenders identity and what actions were taken and what statements were made from the person who has been damaged or may be endangered or discredited and disenfranchised and urgently requires Truth and Remedy.

There is a terrible result from the widespread Abdication of Duty by Law Officers and Government Employees. Legal action will have to be taken to wrest control of records and to force the action of Authorities. There is no other way, you can read my letters asking for help, information and remedy which are posted and I will probably publish my remaining and the posted letters in a newspaper advertisement as well. There has never been a response but for the Authorities and Law Officers to facetiously offer me the door and the Appeal Process or Police Complaint Comissions or the Human Rights Commission.

WHY CAN LAW OFFICERS AND AUTHORITIES NOT SEE WHAT IS OBVIOUS DAMAGE AND ACT ON MY BEHALF

EVERY ASPECT OF THE MOST EASY TO SEE DAMAGE, THE DAMAGE DONE TO MY PROPERTY IS POSTED AND YOU CAN DRIVE IN AND SEE IT RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU AT 4129 OTTER POINT ROAD AND THE BURNED HOUSE IS JUST DOWNHILL ON OTTER POINT ROAD. 

I HAVE THE CARS WHICH WERE STRUCK IN AN OBVOIUS MANNER SHOWING PENETRATION AND IMPACT DAMAGE WHICH COULD ONLY BE DONE UNLAWFULLY BY ANOTHER VEHICLE.

DESPITE THE VISIBLE EVIDENCE AND THE POSTED EVIDENCE, POLICE, BY-LAW AND REGIONAL AND PROVINCIAL AUTHORITIES ALWAYS OBSTRUCT ME AND TRY EVERY POSSIBLE PLOY TO ACT AGAINST ME.

THEY REACT AGAINST THE PERSON WHO HAS TO PROGRESS LITIGATION BECAUSE THE AUTHORITIES NOT ONLY REFUSE TO ACT BUT ACT TO PROTECT LAW BREAKING OFFENDERS BECAUSE THEY REGARD A PROPERTY OWNER SEEKING REMEDY AS A HOSTILE ATTACK ON THEM IN THEIR PRIVLEGED NARCISSISM.

LITIGIOUS, ME?

CAPRICIOUS JUSTICE BLOG COULD CREATE AN IMAGE OF MYSELF AS LITIGIOUS, SEEKING TO BRING LEGAL ACTION AT EVERY TURN. THAT IS NOT TRUE.

 I set up my affairs in the 1960's to have steady employment, savings to buy a home and insurance to pay me if my health and ability to work were damaged.  

I had no plans to have to undertake any litigation, everything was done in a regular manner and meant to provide steady work. Plans to write were contingent on having a steady job, and particularily a job without long hours.

I had to deal with a number of traffic tickets which I won nearly every one of which does show a litigious nature and behavior in Police ticketing.

I HAD TO DEAL WITH LEGAL ACTION I HAD TO TAKE WHEN I WAS INJURED IN ACCIDENTS I DID NOT CAUSE. I TRIED TO SECURE THE CONTINUING PAYMENT OF MY WAGES EACH TIME AS I HAD "OUT OF WORK INSURANCE" MY VEHICLE WAS INSURED AND I HAD A CLAIM:

I WAS AN INJURED AND UNEMPLOYED ACCIDENT VICTIM.

THERE WAS COLLUSION AND THEFT OF MY PAID FOR BENEFIT AND THE DESTRUCTION OF MY FILE AT THE CNR WHICH PROVED MY ABILITY AND EDUCATION.

I was rigorously cheated, receiving about 10% of my lost wages and rendered unemployable due to injury and defamation in place of my fine record at the CNR. I was accused of being "accident prone " and thus " not eligible for future employment" during the court hearing resulting from when I was injured as a passenger in the 1970 car accident which ended my career as an able worker. The defence lawyer uttered statements that the CNR was planning to dismiss me which were unsupported by any evidence and which were rebutted by my immediate Supervisor but the judge erroniously believes what the lawyer says in the " Crony" system which prevails in British Columbia's Courts.

I ACCEPTED MY NEW CONDITION IN 1970 OR 1971. I thought that I might as well try to enjoy myself as much as possible as I was not capable of doing much more than that.  THAT IS NOT A GOOD PLAN. 

This might be caused by the loss of the mindset of the accident victim previous to accident injury. The damage caused by physical head trauma and the prevarication destroy existing  motivation and changes personality traits.

ACCEPTANCE OF MY VIRTUAL PARALYSIS DID NOT LAST FOREVER. GRADUALLY I RECOVERED, BECOMING CAPABLE OF MORE AND MORE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND PHYSICALLY ACTIVE WORK.

I was perfectly capable of assuming the management placement I would have had by 1976. I tried repeatedly to get to return to CNR or corporate work but I was not able to, not ever receiving a cooperative response no matter what I tried to do.

AS I RECOVERED I SET OUT TO ACQUIRE A HOME AND ACREAGE TO BE ABLE TO HOUSE MYSELF AND MY FAMILY AT MINIMAL EXPENSE SO AS TO BE ABLE TO PURSUE THE LIGHTER LESS PHYSICALLY DEMANDING  WORK OF ART, MUSIC, WRITING AND SOME JEWELLERY MANUFACTURING AND SALES.

I FIRMLY BELIEVED THAT IF I OWNED MY HOUSE AND LAND NO ONE WOULD BE ABLE TO ADVERSLY AFFECT ME. I CERTAINLY DID NOT THINK THAT THE PROPERTY I OWNED COULD BECOME THE SCENE OF AND THE PRIZE FOUGHT OVER IN INNUMERABLE CRIMES AND THREATS TO COMMIT CRIME OR TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST ME.  I WAS BEING DESTRUCTIVELY CONTROLLED AND MY PROPERTY WAS BEING DESTROYED AND DESTRUCTIVELY CONTROLLED.  THEN AND ALWAYS, AND CONSISTENTLY I CONSULTED LAWYERS TO FIND OUT WHAT TO DO ABOUT ALL OF THE ACTIONS I DID NOT COMMIT OR PERMIT.