HOW CAN ANYTHING LAWFUL ENSUE AFTER CRIMINAL ACTS ARE PERPETRATED AND FALSE STATEMENTS ARE MADE TO AUTHORITIES ?

AUTHORITIES SUPPORT PERSONS WHO HAVE COMMITTED CRIMINAL OFFENSES AGAINST ME BASED ON FABRICATED COUNTER COMPLAINTS.

Why would the persons who destroyed watercourses and chopped a forest down and stripped the soil from my property be entitled to trespass and repeatedly send Police to my private property? Police files show support for them in writing.

 As I attempted to protect my property and remedy unlawful damage done to MY PROPERTY Police said I was an Environmentalist seeking confrontation. "Collard is an Environmentalist seeking confrontation and must be charged" is a Batshit Crazy entry in the Sooke RCMP files which I have from a Freedom of Information Reply. 

Much is redacted but I guess they thought that that the entry mentioned in the previous paragraph would intimidate me. It did, I struggled to remain active but I gradually gave up everything, I stayed at Otter Point terrorized into a state of Tonic Immobility after  innumerable raids and threats to sic the cops on to me. 

Many raids were by Dogcatchers and their Police Escorts. Female trespassers also got Police Escorts on to my Property which is Batshit Crazy Terrifying! I know they are nuts and will say anything, all of them, any of them. It is so dangerous as they flirt with getting me shot or thrown into jail for just two months and my ex-wife and the Authorities would seize my property at Otter Point.

After 2001, an additional irrational situation developed, Victoria  Police supported trespassers at my Rockcliffe Apartments and allegations were charged  about noise  made by my tenants in Victoria which were exaggerated as if action had to be taken to arrest me out here at Otter Point and the RCMP did raid and arrest and I was not ever guilty of any crime.

POLICE AND BY-LAW OFFICERS AND SHERIFFS SUPPORT OTHER PERSONS ON MY PROPERTY IN VIOLATION OF LAW AND THIS IS BASED ON DEFAMATION WHICH HAS NEVER HELD UP IN COURT AND WHICH HAS NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE BUT COMPLAINTS.

Why do insurance company employees and their Lawyers have the intimidating and threatening support of Police and Sheriffs when they are invariably representing a person who has committed an offence. There is not some immaculate conception when the lies and rejection of the commission of a criminal offence is handed off to a representative. They are doing the same thing as a proxy which the lying offence committing perpetrator of even an "accident" is doing; they are avoiding responsibility for damage done by committing an unlawful act.

I CANNOT SAY FOR SURE IF AN INSURANCE COMPANY EMPLOYEE IS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE ABSOLUTELY HONEST IN ANY STATEMENT THEY MAKE. I KNOW THAT THERE IS REGULATION AND LAW WHICH MAKES THE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT LAWYERS MUST BE TRUTHFUL IN ANY STATEMENT THEY MAKE. 

That would be any statement including lawyers statements to each other and during statements made before the courts without the statement being part of another person's testimony. If it is a previously testified to lie there is the remedy of  perjury charges. If the lawyer is the first to broach the lie the matter is supposed to be adjudicated  BEFORE ANY PROCEEDINGS CONTINUE.

Bar Associations are supposed to remove the lawyers license to practice in any number of situations where lawyers are lying.

SELF SERVING BAR ASSOCIATIONS DO NOT ACT.

LYING LAWYERS ARE JUST DOING BUSINESS AS USUAL