Friday, March 18, 2022

AN EXAMPLE OF REJECTIONISM THAT COST ME $30K OF MY CASH, MY CAR AND MY INJURY SETTLEMENT AND LOSS OF EARNINGS PAYMENTS FOR A DECEMBER 1998 ACCIDENT I DID NOT CAUSE.COMPARED TO BEFORE THE ACCIDENT,I HAVE EXPERIENCED MORE DISENABLEMENT SINCE THEN. I SUFFER FROM THOSE INJURIES STILL

I TOOK DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO ICBC OFFICES IN VICTORIA BC. ICBC SENT POLICE HERE TO OTTER POINT BC

  1. Lindon CollardMarch 18, 2022   I wrote this originally as an email I sent to Rebecca.


    Rejectionism. Explained by an example; In Dec.1998 ICBC unlawfully demanded I travel to ICBC, seriously injured. I arrived at ICBC in Victoria fifty kilometers from Otter point with drawings, calculations:( Lofgren screams at me ÈYou are making me late for my vacationÈ.

    I am not going to settle like poor people, which I appear to be and am, so she can get her bonus for settling me as she needs more, mo money for HER vacation. To hell with the injured.

    My drawings and calculations information is all complicaty and confusey to the woman, Bink Lofgren, who is posing as an accident investigator. She rejects me and my information.

    She has a simple story from the man who caused the accident. I must have been going too fast for him to see me coming, ( Pincombe said that in writing) as he turned left on the wrong side of the road, that excused him driving up the wrong side of the road because very bad "Speeding is alleged " though the calculations and drawings would have proved otherwise.

    Bink has heard I was bad and my wife also said "He twists everything" because I straighten out lies.Here I am all technical and everything when it is easy to understand if you simplify.
    Lindon bad, Pincombe is another Government employee he must be good. Lindon must have caused the accident. She must pressure me. She calls Sooke RCMP for help to settle me.

    Sooke RCMP Berube arrived here AT Otter Point.  HE CAME TO MY DOOR WITHOUT A WARRANT.
    Government employees have Full Backup. They can do anything. How do ICBC employees who I am calling liars and frauds need Police here Fifty Kilometers from where they are located?


  2. Sooke RCMP Berube  said È You are having a pissing contest with ICBC È. He is an ignorant Habitant!
    La Bouche is the presence of FLQ HATRED OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLE here in BC.

    I was adamantly opposed to the FLQ, that is how Donetz got this Russia on Ukraine war going.

    Bink Lofgren, probably a pseudonym, sent Police here. The damned accursed French Canadian presence here in BC had ARRIVED.

    THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA REPRESENTATIVE SAYS:
    ! YOU ARE HAVING A PISSING CONTEST WITH ICBC !

    I was not paid but actually ripped off to pay the lawyer ICBC hired who had surrounded me with Sheriffs in the BC Supreme Court. I collapsed and then they moved up court dates so I could not attend more hearings they held to benefit the ICBC Lawyer. It was my accident litigation, ICBC runs it so I can^t be there and then in a criminal act, it is against he law, they have to go further arrogantly rejecting me and awarding Pincombes lawyer $8500 so neither Pincombe nor ICBC would pay. They showed me; but it was a corrupt ruling by corrupt Judge Dorgan.
    Dorgan was also enlisted to act corruptly in Anne's custody case. Is Judge Dorgan the most corrupt Judge in BC.

    I DEMAND FULL RESPONSIBILITY BY CANADA FOR THIS AND A HUNDRED OTHER interventions against my lawful sensible works and litigations.
    Bink Lofgren can understand simple: Lindon Collard bad, his wife said so."He twists everything.





Jus13t7p5o 1cn5thgs0o8w4 
Shared with Public
Public
REJECTIONISM WAS CREATED, I BELIEVE BY A REASONABLE AND NECESSARY INSURMOUNTABLE CAPRICIOUS RIGHT TO REJECT PHYSICAL CONTACT ADVANCES. REJECTIONISM IS PROJECTED INTO BUSINESS AND ADJUDICATION.
It is terribly damaging to have Rejectionist fairy tale believing Morons adjudicate ANYTHING PARTICULARLY when they can believe an unreasonable story and reject obvious injury, damage to property and prospects, damage to a vehicle, my testimony and my calculations and drawings which I have such confidence in the accuracy THEREOF THAT I DID SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS TO THE RCMP.
I brought the technical details to the meeting with ICBC. Where was their technician?
An RCMP officer in Ottawa I sent the data to commented that I was correct.
Why did nothing happen. I have proof, (the car,) of fraud. Did the Rejectionists in the Sooke RCMP rule? Yes, I can prove they did. It is damaging to have RCMP here in BC,
I had to go home head injured,, alone after the accident, I could have died!
Then one day later, ICBC argued and threatened me and forced me drive 100 kilometres, round trip, unlawfully demanding I meet with them. The accident investigator wanted to wrap it up and get spending the settlement bonus, declaredly going on vacation right away. Bink Lofgren said ``You are making me late for my vacation``.
I taped ICBC`s Bink and Greg and Denise (probably all phony names.) on the bodypack tape recorder I used to carry under my right arm.
I would permanently and at hard labor, imprison all of those ``sworn not to reject`` but but to honestly adjudicate, Rejectionist Frauds and show it every day on TV so this stops. There is no reason whatsoever to let these criminals escape justice.


REJECTIONISM

AT UNIVERSITY, SOCIOLOGY WAS THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE I FOUND REALLY INTERESTING. THE BEHAVIOR OF MANY PERSONS IS NOT ONLY PSYCHIATRICALLY OR PSYCHOLOGICALLY AFFECTED BUT WHEN THE PHENOMENON IS REALLY WIDESPREAD, THE BEHAVIOR CREATES A SOCIAL MOVEMENT OR SOCIAL INERTIA.


 

THE DOCTRINE "YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO THIS IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO" AND "YOU DO NOT HAVE TO PUT UP WITH THAT IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO" HAS CREATED A MISCONSTRUED RIGHT TO FAIL TO KEEP PROMISES WHICH ARE MADE TO OBTAIN A BENEFIT AND ARE OBLIGATORY, NOT OPTIONAL AND TO ALLOW INTERFERENCE WITH OTHER PERSON'S EXERCISING MORE IMPORTANT RIGHTS THAN THE RIGHT TO REJECT AND THEN EJECT OR PROSTRATE OTHER PERSONS TO FACILITATE REJECTIONISM OR TO, MOTIVATED BY REJECTIONISM, PUNISH OR TRY TO PUNISH THAT OR THOSE WHOM YOU REJECT.


THERE ARE MANY "TECHNICALLY ORCHESTRATED'' FORMS OF REJECTION WHICH INVOLVE PREVARICATION AND THEN FACILITATE PUNITIVE ACTION BY THE REJECTIONISTS CLAIMING THAT THE REJECTED WHOMEVER OR WHATEVER HAS PUT THEM IN DANGER. THEN THEY FAKE A 911 CALL.


THAT IS A SERIOUS CRIME, REPORT THAT.

WHOAH! MORE REJECTIONISM. 

NO ONE CARES! ANY DAMAGE THAT HAS BEEN DONE DOES NOT MATTER.

REJECTIONISM  SOCIOLOGICALLY DICTATES THAT NO ONE EVEN WANTS TO ''HEAR'' ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED AND CERTAINLY DOES NOT "CARE" ABOUT IT.


THE REJECTION OF ART, MUSIC OR WRITING WHEN IT IS MORPHED INTO DEFAMATION, DECLARATIONS THAT THE ARTIST IS OF UNSOUND MIND, ( So What?) AND EFFORTS TO HAMPER OR DISPOSSESS THE ARTIST OR TO JUSTIFY STEALING PROPERTY OR INHERITANCES IS THE REALLY CRAZY EDGE OF REJECTIONISM. 

MILITANT REJECTIONISM.





YOU BETTER NOT HAVE "USED" POLICE TO DO THAT TO ME, IF CAN FIND SOMEONE WHO DID IT WITH YOU.......


FEMALE SUPREMACIST HEN FORCEMENT EH?

THE FSHF





Sunday, March 13, 2022

DISABLED AND ATTACKED AND DEFAMED AND EXTORTED DESPITE MY PICKING MYSELF UP AND ALWAYS TRYING AGAIN WITH LESS AND LESS MOBILITY AND STRENGTH EACH TIME.

 

RE.

Friday, March 11, 2022

THE "FIFTH" IN CANADA

FUNCTIONALLY, POLICE SILENCE IS A FORM OF IMMUNITY LIKE THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION'S FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO SILENCE.


THE RESULT IS THE SAME. YOU CAN NOT GET ANY INFORMATION OUT OF THOSE WHO CREATE A RIGHT TO BE SILENT FOR THEMSELVES AND FOR OTHER PERSONS AS WELL, IN CANADA. 


I AM NOT ALLOWED  TO INVESTIGATE TO FIND OUT WHO HAS OFFENDED AGAINST ME OR DAMAGED MY PROPERTY. 


POLICY, NOT LAW, A COLLUSION, CREATES A DE FACTO PROHIBITION. 


EXCLUSIVELY, ONLY THE POLICE ARE ALLOWED TO INVESTIGATE  AND IT IS NOT POSSIBLE, IN MY CASE, TO OBTAIN THE INFORMATION FROM THEM.



PEOPLE WHO WERE PHYSICALLY HARASSING ME BY TRESPASSING AND MAKING FAKE 911 CALLS WHICH SENT POLICE TO MY PROPERTY GOT THE POLICE TO CHARGE ME SAYING I WAS HARASSING THEM BY INVESTIGATING. OR DEMANDING THAT THERE BE NO MORE TRESPASSING ON MY PROPERTY.



IN A LESS OFFICIAL FORM OF THE  PREVENTION OF THE DOCUMENTATION OF EVIDENCE TO TAKE REMEDIAL LEGAL ACTION, PERSONS WHO ARE BEING SOUGHT BY MYSELF IN ORDER TO MAKE THEM TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE WILL ENGAGE BY-LAW, SHERIFFS, BRITISH COLUMBIA SPECIAL  CONSTABLES AND POLICE TO "TIT FOR TAT" MAKE COMPLAINTS ABOUT ME.



A MAFIA- LIKE OMERTA: THE BLUE WALL OF SILENCE  ALWAYS  TAKES THE FIFTH.

Wednesday, March 9, 2022

GANG HERE GANG THERE GANGS EVERYWHERE

A gang is a group or society of associates, friends or members of a family with a defined leadership and internal organization that identifies with or claims control over territory in a community and engages, either individually or collectively, in illegal, and possibly violent, behavior. Wikipedia

Contemporaneously, with "Gangs" being defined broadly, there  need not be a physical territory for a gang to function, although many gangs I have faced had a territory. 

The Alf Toone corporation had a physical territory which they expanded to control a Gary Oak Meadow adjacent to the Rockcliffe, my parking lot, my Apartment Building and myself. 

The Rednecks up the street had a territory, their acreages which they felt included the road allowance between their properties and my property here at Otter Point through the tenure here of three owners. 


THERE ARE VIRTUAL NON PHYSICAL TERRITORIES.

The exclusive conduct of administration and government process creates a territory. 


Keeping my inheritances away from me or secret and kept away from me through the theft and keeping possession of my mail created a territory for the Sibling Collard Family Gang, that included my sister in law and my wife. The gang and the individuals diverted and converted my inheritances and they also exploited me and extorted me of my really puny earnings.  


IT IS NOT AS FAR FETCHED AS YOU MIGHT THINK IT WOULD BE TO BE IN A GANG . I KNOW ABOUT PEOPLE WHO HELPED MY WIFE DO HER DEFAMATORY WORK WHO WOULD NOT THINK OF THEMSELVES AS "IN A CRIMINAL GANG" BUT THEY WERE.


A divorce which begins with "Sign over all your assets or I will say you abused me'' is a criminal enterprise.


My ex-wife got lawyers and other persons to attempt to dispossess me of  my property. The Divorce Gang was another criminal gang which was based on the use of  false allegations, in my case, so there was no actual assessment of what my ex-wife had coming to her based upon Law and what she had done to diminish Family assets and to limit my ability to work.  Furthermore the Gang was composed of some serial offenders, individuals who set themselves up in business to cater to and facilitate divorce based extortion. 


As soon as three people are involved in anything which would create a negative outcome for another person they are in a different category from an individual offender as that  behavior is  codified in the Criminal Code of Canada.  Clang, Gang. 


The Police and By-Law constitute a group with a wide reaching territory they control and they have been called "the biggest gang" by other commentators. I concur.

  1. An irrelevant comment was removed. Enough of this has been left on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alright. I will not bother you again.

 

Pengun is on Comments bracketing his withdrawal notice. He did remove his last post which was after his announced withdrawal. 



    1. Yes the biggest gang, you tried to use against everyone, and failed miserably.

      Delete
  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Allegedly, Pengun is done "bothering me", but there is a comment here purporting  that I had "tried to use (Police and By-Law)against everyone and failed miserably".
    When damage was done to land or watercourses I made application to the BC Department of the Environment. I attempt to litigate against anyone who damages myself or my property.

    I did not call Police but once when 12 people were at the Rockcliffe on my property fencing it off from the Gary Oak Meadow in 2001.

    In 1982 I hired lawyer Moe Sihota, later NDP Minister of the Environment to represent me. Still, I wrote the documents and argued the case before the Environmental Appeal Board of the BC Cabinet.I did not engage the services of the Police and By-Law Gang to use against anyone.

    I eventually began to be aware of the criminal nature of other acts contrary to my interest which had been perpetrated and called for the prosecution of thieves, vandals, frauds and false accusers I do admit.

    I wrote the Writs and progressed a suit in the BC Supreme Court about making up stories that defame an injured party to get out of trouble,
    Prevarication with collusion involved and a part of the suit.

    THAT IS ADMIRABLE. IT IS NOT USING`THE GANG`IT IS SELF REPRESENTATION.



Tuesday, March 8, 2022

FALSE INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE ABLE TO OVERRULE MY CLEARLY STATED INTENTIONS AND MY DECLARATIONS OF ADHERENCE TO REGULATION AND THE RULE OF LAW.

 

CAPRICIOUS JUSTICE; IN THE BEGINNING

 

I OWN FRAGILE MUSICAL EQUIPMENT AND LIVE IN GLASS HOUSES I DO NOT WANT TROUBLE OR DESTRUCTION

 

LAW ABIDING BY NATURE

IT IS NOT IN MY NATURE TO OFFEND.  I AM NOT ANXIOUS TO HARM ANYONE OR TAKE THEIR PROPERTY.  I AGREE WITH THE ENTIRETY OF THE PREMISE THAT EVERYONE BENEFITS FROM A PEACEFUL LAW ORDERED SOCIETY.  

Men much like myself have produced laws and rules for hundreds of years and have crafted a code of conduct. I concur. Criminal Police enforced Laws are meant to do with the prevention of and the punishment of acts which cause egregious harm to persons or property. 

THERE WAS NO INTENTION BY THE LEGISLATORS TO EMPOWER  UNEVEDINCED AND UNWARRANTED USE OF POLICE AS AGENTS OF PUNISHMENT.   THE PERSONS WHO EXAGGERATE OR FABRICATE COMPLAINTS TO AUTHORITIES TO PUNISH AN INNOCENT PERSON ARE CREATING EGREGIOUS HARM. THE FALSE COMPLAINTENTS ARE CRIMINALS.

A TERRIBLE FLAW IN THE MODERN INTERPRETATION OF POLICING IS THE RETENTION OF FALSE AND FABRICATED COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE VICTIM          OF THE FALSE INFORMING OR DELIBERATE CONSTANT CALLING IN FALSE COMPLAINTS DESPITE THE VICTIM'S INNOCENCE. 

Elected officials say they do not interfere with Police but the falsely accused should not be dumped into a complaint process for criminals where Police declare complaintents hostile and dangerous and try to punish the victimized person  and raid in force saying that Police are in danger. 

Police do not want to act to apprehend the serious offenders who falsely inform Police, commit perjurious acts making false phone complaints and are targeting and stalking another person, which is the serious offence, criminal harassment. Police consider the complaints as against them, will not cough up the false informers identity and will not investigate themselves.  

POLICE CLAIM THEY ARE ENDANGERED BY VICTIMS WHO POSE NO DANGER DEMANDING A LAW ORDERED SOCIETY FREE FROM PUNISHMENT AND DEFAMATION THROUGH THE USE OF FALSE INFORMING AND EXAGGERATION      BY PERSONS WHO ARE  IN NO DANGER AND DO NOT NEED POLICE PROTECTION.






Wednesday, August 11, 2010

EXCERPTS FROM THE LETTER I BROUGHT TO M.L.A. John Horgan

I have dictated and attempted to edit this letter but I can only read for a short time and there are still possibly some typographical errors.

The other difficulty which is presented in addition to physical disability is that nobody seems to care, nobody appears to have read any letters in any receptive manner. The only thing I experience besides being totally ignored is being attacked for insisting that neither my person nor my property should be damaged or invaded without my having access to recourse. It is not possible to simply forget and move on when most of one's productive working ability is destroyed by accident injury and not only is there no substitute for the earnings lost but the defamatory process used to implement this denial makes a person vulnerable to additional negative treatment. In addition the continual loss of property and money that I have experienced through abuse of process really results in an impoverished life even though I have property I do not have any substantial earnings and each time I find myself caused another needless expense or another debilitating seizure my life just gets to be less and less and less.

Since I began to write this letter I have noticed that other persons who are injured by an impact to the head and to the brain stem neck area exhibit similar symptoms to the symptoms. I have reported and that these persons with similar injury say that terrifying and debilitating results ensue after any form of seizure. The terrible policy of denying injury and then claiming that the injured person is subject to mental defect and then intimidating harassing and threatening the injured person causes fear and seizures. So often I hear that other head injured persons who are subject to seizure are terrified at the prospect of having another seizure. The policy ICBC, lawyers, Police by-law officers even neighbours and relatives of trying to intimidate or over power me causes terrible fear and seizures. After I experience a seizure I like other head injured persons find that I have regressed, I have lost progress towards attaining mobility and I stop making progress. Sometimes I spend months or even years laying in bed unable to move, if I do move I experience increasing spasm, distress, nausea, inability to breath and of late sometimes severe pain. The strange game of pretending that I am dangerous and that the police should be used to intimidate me on my own property when I have done nothing to warrant this treatment creates a situation and I refuse to take responsibility for this situation and demand that those who are responsible be stopped in the most forceful possible manner from continuing to do this.

It is completely unrestful and terrifying that there will be an armed intervention at any time and it really makes it hard to rest and sleep under these conditions. No matter how many times the allegations of distress are proved to be without merit, the Capital Regional District and Victoria City Bylaw officials RCMP, and Victoria Police consider the complaints to be culminative even when they are proven to have no merit in expensive and time consuming hearings and court procedures. There is no procedure nor any inclination by our law officers which will deter these continual supplicants for Police aid whose fake 911 calls are designed to terrify people they do not like. I have been arrested during these faux-disputes where I am on my own property it is my property which is involved or I won't be there to be disputed with and the Police are helping someone out by allegedly doing their job but there is no provision under the law for them to  act as they are and it is eventually proven in court that I did not commit any criminal act but it is terrifying to be arrested and charged four times and expensive. I was dragged off my property at Otter Point by RCMP turned over to Victoria Police and released in Victoria and I was innocent of all charges, that was the height of what drove me away from the apartment building in 2001. Recently I was threatened with the issue of a warrant for my arrest during a rentalsman dispute where a tenant got out of her lease and got eleven hundred dollars compensation for a fake mouse complaint, there are still no mice in the building nine months later, but while I was trying to appeal the rentalsman decision I was threatened that a warrant would be issued for my arrest if I wouldn't pay the $1,100 dollars. Have you ever been threatened with arrest? You don't know what its like if it hasn't happened to you and it is worse still if you know that you're being defrauded. Just to make this clear, the Crown has processes and agents who are available for persons to start trouble. The lax  control which is exercised results that regardless how carefully and lawfully one behaves something could be made up at any moment which could start the terrifying process where Police or Sheriffs become a physical threat and a source of terrifying and unrelenting hyper-vigilance. This has got to stop.

There are even more irrational and terrifying aspects to the enablement of such abuse. After my December 20th 1986 accident my ex-wife Betty Collard said to me "You better be careful your worth more to me dead or divorced." A few years later she said to me "My lawyer (Tyler Lucci)  and I know about your neck and back and we are going to put so much pressure on you that your neck and your back are going to go." "The Police are turned on to you I have told them that you are violent and aggressive and fly off the handle." This nonsense is embedded in Police records and is available to any law officer or lawyer and I wonder who else. It is absolutely untrue I am a predictable and non violent person. I have never hurt so much as a cat or a bird nor am I capable of executing any form of physical violence. I have been more and more disabled and incapable with each succeeding accident injury and of late I have begun to suffer more injury as a result of numerous collapses which occur when I am threatened with Police intervention which if you watch You tube or the news you must realize is violent and dangerous and not motivated rationally.

Again I'll mention the cumulative nature of complaints which even when they are unproven or disproven create an attitude of hostility towards an innocent person and there is a desire to punish me as if I am a troublemaker. I have pursued a remedy for this dangerous debilitating and frightening situation.When I attempted to remedy this matter by obtaining legal council I found that there was no who was interested. It was actually said to me that I "was the sort of person this law firm couldn't represent." I was advised that I had better find myself legal council. How terrifying. When I couldn't obtain representation I decided that I would bring suit over lying prevarication and thus obtain the evidence which would allow me to obtain proper legal representation as this would overcome the defamation which had been created regarding myself. Harold Turnham of Turnham Woodland Waddell Rupponi came to court lied and had me sourrounded by Sheriffs as I was pleading my case as plaintiff not a defendant before the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Harold Turnham had repeatedly interrupted me, had waggled his fingers right in my face grinning and chuckling. I collapsed when I was surrounded by the sheriffs which Harold Turnham called into the court room to surround intimidate and terrify me. I have not ever been able to return to court since one more hearing after that where the Judge threatened that if I continued to "assault Mr. Turnham's integrity" which is to insist that Mr. Harold Turnham was lying and was abusing process, I was threatened "We have cells here we could lock you up" I have not ever been able to return to a court room again to plead any form of case and this is extremely disabling for a person who is in business and who must deal with the situation I have outlined in this letter.

The result of all of this is that I cannot drive my car or walk about freely. Even when I am on my own property in the city of Victoria or in Sooke BC or at Otter Point I can never get over the feeling of dread or impending doom despite the fact that I own the property in most cases for hundreds of feet in each direction. There have been too many invasions of my property. It makes it hard to fall asleep when rest is needed in order to attend an appointment or a meeting or any structured time event. I also mentioned to the psychiatrist that quite often sleep is only obtained for a few hours. There is some sort of feeling of unrest associated with being on a property that you've been dragged off to jail over by a false complaint. What is a false complaint? for one:  no one is in danger and two: It doesn't stand the scrutiny of the courts. But false as the complaint can be one has been dragged off to jail or forced to come to court and could get dragged off to jail just for making some minor error and even the most false and unprovable allegation if its serous enough can keep you worried and keep the Police after you for years.

The abusive process and the denial of remedy which results in a situation such as I have outlined in this letter must be brought to a stop and I am sure that neither the fake 911 callers nor the lawyers nor the Police will stop voluntarily. Something has to be done to stop and to remedy this abuse.

THE GANG

WHAT ARE THE ORIGINS OF "THE GANG"?


"OUR GANG', HERE IN CANADA:

 

"THE GANG" OF THE ALLEGEDLY

 "SWORN"

THAT CONTROLS THE ADMINISTRATION 

OF JUSTICE, THE USE OF POLICE POWER, 

THE GRANTING OF LICENSES AND 

PERMITS AND THE  DISTRIBUTION OF 

GOVERNMENT MONIES AND SERVICES  

TO US THE CITIZENS WHO PAY FOR THAT.

 

THE GANG CONVENIENTLY INCLUDES ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE ANY POWER IN OUR SOCIETY, POLICE, BY-LAW OFFICERS, THE MYRIAD GOVERNMENT MINISTRY AND MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENT  ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. 


WARNING: LAWYERS WHO SWORE OATHS TO BE TRUTHFUL AND HONEST AND TO FAITHFULLY REPRESENT YOU IF YOU HIRE THEM TO GET THEIR JOBS ARE NOT TRUTHFUL AND HONEST. THEY DO NOT PROVIDE A REMEDY TO THE CONTINUAL MACHINATIONS OF "THE GANG" AS THEY ADVERTISE THEY WILL DO FOR YOU.  


LAWYERS ARE FULLY INVOLVED IN AND ARE FULLFLEGED MEMBERS OF "THE GANG". THERE WILL BE NO REMEDY!


THERE ARE CLAIMS MADE BY OUR POLITICIANS THAT THEY ARE NEUTRAL AND CANNOT INTERFERE IN SO MANY DAMAGING  MISUSES OF GOVERNMENT POWER BUT ALL THEY ARE DOING IS BACKING UP THE REST OF "THE GANG". 

Gang         Organization type 

                                                          

                                  

Description

A gang is a group or society of associates, friends or members of a family with a defined leadership and internal organization that identifies with or claims control over territory in a community and engages, either individually or collectively, in illegal, and possibly violent, behavior. Wikipedia          

Defined broadly, there  need not be a physical territory for a gang to function. The exclusive conduct of administration and government process creates a territory. This is the gang that I refer to as " The Gang".

There are a whole lot of other gangs in our society.

The possession of my mail created a territory within the Family Gang which exploited and extorted me. 

My ex-wife got a lawyer and other persons to attempt to dispossess me of  my property; that was another criminal gang.

The Police and By-Law constitute a group with a wide reaching territory they control and they have been called "the biggest gang" by other commentators. I concur.



      1. An irrelevant comment was removed. Enough of this has been left on.

        ReplyDelete
      2. Alright. I will not bother you again.

      3. Pengun brackets his Withdrawal from Commenting  "I won't bother you anymore" with more false misleading and demeaning comments about myself. 

      4. He posted and removed a Comment post Withdrawal.

    1. Yes the biggest gang, you tried to use against everyone, and failed miserably.

      Delete
  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Allegedly, Pengun is done "bothering me", but there is a comment here purporting that I had "tried to use (Police and By-Law)against everyone and failed miserably".
    When damage was done to land or watercourses I made application to the BC Department of the Environment. I attempt to litigate against anyone who damages myself or my property.

    I did not call Police but once when 12 people were at the Rockcliffe on my property fencing it off from the Gary Oak Meadow in 2001.

    In 1982 I hired lawyer Moe Sihota, later NDP Minister of the Environment to represent me. Still, I wrote the documents and argued the case before the Environmental Appeal Board of the BC Cabinet.I did not engage the services of the Police and By-Law Gang to use against anyone.

    I eventually began to be aware of the criminal nature of other acts contrary to my interest which had been perpetrated and called for the prosecution of thieves, vandals, frauds and false accusers I do admit.

    I wrote the Writs and progressed a suit in the BC Supreme Court about making up stories that defame an injured party to get out of trouble,
    Prevarication with collusion involved and a part of the suit.

    THAT IS ADMIRABLE. IT IS NOT USING`THE GANG`IT IS SELF REPRESENTATION.


 


.

  ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. THE DEMANDS THAT THE BENEFITS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BE SHARED WITH ALL CITIZENS AND RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTRY...