MY PROPERTY AND MY PROSPECTS ARE MINE

WHAT WOULD POSSESS THOSE WHO THINK THEY SHOULD ENTER UNINVITED ONTO MY PROPERTY 

OR WHO THINK THEY SHOULD INTERFERE WITH MY PLANS OR FABRICATE FALSEHOODS ABOUT WHAT I AM PURPORTED TO THINK IN ORDER TO DO HARM ?

Unaware are those who cannot see the plain truth about interfering troublemakers, liars, thieves, frauds and criminally culpable false informers.

It is plain that there is no product of any value produced by the afformentioned actions. It is a selfish declaration of having such overruling rights and powers or being in such danger that all reasonable and common precepts of law will be violated and property and project ownership and practice must be overruled and terminated by imprisonment and seizure.

ANYONE WHO THINKS THEY CAN OVERRULE MY OWNERSHIP OF MY PROPERTY OR YOUR OWNERSHIP OF YOUR PROPERTY IS A DANGEROUS MENTALLY ILL SEDITONIST AND YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE THAT

GENERALIZATION

ONCE AGAIN I FOUND MYSELF DEFENDING MY WIDE RANGING CRITICISM OF WOMEN'S OVERUSE OF THE POWERS OF AUTHORITY TO EXPLOIT AND DIMINISH MEN AND MYSELF IN PARTICULAR

I will cite instance after instance of egregious misuse of need for support and need for defence and  need for intervention so that a woman can control and impoverish or imprision a man.  That just plain happens all the time.  What is put forward in defence is that all women are not like that.

This could very well be the case but it has not been my experience and further the canard is progressed by unscrupulous men and women, and particularily Lawyers By-Law enforcement and Police play upon the women in danger theme or turn pussy and become the same faux endangered person so they can react violentlty against a man who is lawfully rejecting an intervention against him or against his property while he is on that property in the most egregious cases.

THRUSTING WOMEN FORWARD SO A REJECTION OF INTERVENTION CAN BE FALSELY CHARACTERIZED AS AGAINST OR A HATRED OF WOMEN OR AS PLACING WOMEN IN DANGER IS LOW, CRASS AND CRIMINAL.

HERE IS A LITTLE STORY WHICH ENDS UP WITH POLICE THRUSTING A WOMAN FORWARD AT A GROWER`S HOME WHILE THEY STAND BACK LITERTALLY STROKING THEIR CLUBS LIKE THEY WERE PLEASURING THEMSELVES RIGHT HERE IN THE YARD:

This is a story which begins with women at the Alf Toone subsidizd Housing Cooperative which is located near but is not actually contiguous with my Rockcliffe Apartments, only the Park they think they own actually touches my land, at the back of my parking lot. 

The women are at war with me whom they have not met, they have blazed in with a Police Escort and mobbed in with twelve of them and thrown beer bottles at my son and they stated

`WE ARE GOING TO BANKRUPT HIM AND HIS FERARRI`

The Alf Toone women did more and more of what controlling hateful copcalling women do: They called the Cops and sent the By-Law and the Fire Inspector from Victoria out here to Otter Point and they always brought ENFORCEMENT with them.

STALKING FURIOUSLY AT THE ROCKCLIFFE A TRUCK WHICH I OWNED WAS SPOTTED BY ALF TOONE WOMEN AND POLICE WERE CALLED ON ME ABOUT WHAT FABRICATION I DO NOT KNOW BUT IT PUT MY TRUCK ON A SHIT LIST AND WHEN MY SON WENT TO PICK UP MY DAUGHTER THEY WROTE THE TRUCK UP TO BE INSPECTED OR TAKEN OFF THE ROAD.

That Toyota pickup was my garbage run to the local dump during renovations truck, I really liked my truck, the only one I ever had and I had to take it off the road. I gave the truck to my son Louis carefully telling him to file the registration papers with the truck in his name. MY SON LOUIS LEFT IT REGISTERED IN MY NAME. THEN HE SOLD IT TO NOW DEAD YAHOO MORGAN PORTER WHO ALSO DID NOT REGISTER IT IN HIS NAME.

THE OFF ROAD TRUCK, NO LONGER A NICE SILVER WAS FLAT BLACK WITH RAGGED FENDER CUTOUTS AND WAS ROLLED ON OTTER POINT ROAD AT THE GOLF COURSE IN SOOKE BC.

THE POLICE CAME FOR ME LATER THAT MORNING

HERE IS THE BACK TO THE WOMAN`S CANARD SCENE

Five RCMP arrive and step back stroking their batons sending a tiny terrified female member to the door to accost me ` supposedly a danger to women `` at the Alf Toone end of this double Anus and Colon end and at this end

they send a woman to the door here at Otter Point. 

LET US STOP PRETENDING CRIMINAL INSANITY DOES NOT EXIST. ALL OF THE TERRORIZING AND WANTING TO BANKRUPT AND COP CALLING IS CRIMINAL AND THERE IS NO RATIONAL REASON. IT IS INSANE. 

CRIMINAL INTENT

FINANCIAL CRIMES, MAKING FALSE REPORTS TO AUTHORITIES, CHEATING PEOPLE BY UNLAWFUL REJECTION OF A CLAIM FOR LOSS OR INJURY, THE CRIMES WHERE BY-LAW OR POLICE OBSTRUCT PEOPLE OR LEAN ON PEOPLE AND TERRIFY THEM: 

SUCH CRIMES BEGIN WITH THE FORMULATION OF A  CRIMINAL INTENT; PLANNED AND PREMEDITATED.

IT IS INCREDIBLE THAT POLICE AND COURTS AND AUTHORITIES DO NOT RECOGNIZE HOW EVIL AND DAMAGIMG THESE CRIMES ARE.

INSTEAD THE WRATH AND PUNISHMENT OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IS FOCUSSED ON THE REMEDY AND PROSECUTION OF CRIMES WHERE THE PERPETRATOR MIGHT ERR THROUGH A LAPSE OF JUDGEMENT WHICH RESULTED IN THE COMMISSION OF A CRIMINAL OFFENCE OR MIGHT COMMIT A CRIME OF OMMISSION, FAILING TO REGISTER OR FAILING TO APPLY AND GET A PERMIT OR TO FOLLOW OTHER DEMANDED PROCEDURES AND OBEYANCES

DOES ANYONE THINK THAT THE DRUG ADDICT, FOR INSTANCE, FORMULATED A CRIMINAL INTENT TO BECOME A DRUG ADDICT?

Drug addicts who sell drugs are judged as the creators of their customers problem but is this really true? It is true in the case of pimps who will create a dependency on drugs to be able to control and profit from addicted prostitutes. The drug addict who sells drugs to other addicts does not control them. The entire Drug Crime System is absurd. Give drug addicts the drugs they need not jail.

The drunken person who is driving a vehicle is judged most harshly because of the damage that can be done by an uncontrolled vehicle but it is unlikely that the drunk driver intended to hurt anyone or destroy life and property. The intoxicated driver is judged to offend, an equivalent bad act to those with a truly criminally intent due to the drunken disregard for the safety of others.

I COULD LIST MANY MORE CRIMES WHICH ARE VIGOROUSLY INVESTIGATED AND PROSECUTED WHERE THERE IS NOT ANY TRUE CRIMINAL INTENT. 

THERE ARE MANY WHITE COLLAR CRIMES WHICH ARE RENDOLENT WITH CRIMINAL INTENT, THE PERPETRATORS PLAN TO COMMIT THEIR CRIMES AS IF THEY ARE SIMPLY WORKING BUSINESS AS USUAL. 

I believe that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia is engaged in an ongoing conspiracy by formulating criminal intent in the actions of their employees, ajusters and lawyers which extends into corrupting Police testimony.

Rewarding employees for forcing insufficent settlements on accident victims who are also the insured of the cInsurance Corporation of British Columbia is tolerated by Police and Prosecutors but it is conspiratorial and it is collusion against the accident victim and it often involves prevarication as well.

PERCEIVING CRIMINAL INTENT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE QUALIFYING FACTOR WHEN ONE IS ASSESSING WHETHER OR AN ACT IS TRULY A CRIMINAL OFFENCE

CRIMES OF OMMISSION OR THOSE CAUSED BY A LAPSE IN JUDGEMENT ARE NOT IN THE SAME LEAGUE AS PREMEDITATED CRIME. CRIMINAL INTENT IS THE FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE OF FINANCIAL CRIMES, MAKING FALSE REPORTS TO AUTHORITIES, CHEATING PEOPLE BY UNLAWFUL REJECTION OF A CLAIM FOR LOSS OR INJURY AND THE CRIMES WHERE BY-LAW OR POLICE OBSTRUCT PEOPLE OR LEAN ON PEOPLE AND TERRIFY THEM.

 

GABRIEL WARTMAN'S RAMPAGE OF MURDER IS BEING FALSELY CATAGORIZED AS MOTIVATED BY A HATRED OF WOMEN

TWENTY-TWO PEOPLE WERE KILLED. IF THE MURDERS WERE EXACTLY 50% OF EACH GENDER THAT WOULD BE ELEVEN MEN AND ELEVEN WOMEN. 

The CBC announcer grimly pronounced that the murder victims were mostly women as if Wartman had specifically targeted women. The inference being that women were just plain unsafe from men.

13 WOMEN WERE KILLED, THAT IS JUST TWO MORE WOMEN KILLED THAN A STATISTICAL HALF.

I have had a whole lot of very bad things done to me by women. All criticism is peremptorily dismissed as " Hatred of Women". This nonsense has to stop.

I am frankly really agitated and concerned by the incredible linking of violent murderers with the critics of the unlawful and unethical acts of women.

 

GABRIEL WARTMANS UP THE ROAD, IN THE TOWN AND RAIDING FROM THE CITY

GABRIEL WARTMANS HERE, GABRIEL WARTMANS THERE, GARBIEL WARTMANS EVERYWHERE

I have only a little time to write but I will revisit this post and add to this post.

GABRIEL WARTMAN SOUGHT TO DESTROY THE PEOPLE AROUND HIM AS A SOLITARY ASSASSIAN BUT HE DID ASSUME THE MANTLE AND APPEARANCE OF AUTHORITY TO ENABLE HIS CRIME AND TO MAKE HIS CRIME MORE ANGUISHING FOR THE VICTIMS AND THE SURVIVORS OF HIS UNPROVOKED AND UNNECESSARY VIOLEMCE.

I must reflect on how a group of Wartmans have attacked me, myself alone over and over again.

 1. IN A MANNER EXACTLY LIKE WARTMAN, PALFRY SHOT AT ME ON THE BACK BALCONY OF THE HOUSE I HAD JUST PURCHASED, ON THIS LAND BY OTTER POINT ROAD. DID HE THINK I WAS THE PREVIOUS OWNER? DID HE, MENTALLY IL, INSTITUTIONALIZED, DO EXACTLY WHAT THE OTHER WARTMANS WANTED?

2. DID WARTMAN UTTER THREATS ALIKE TO " SHOOT YOU OFF THAT FANCY SILVER BICYCLE OF YOURS" AS WARTMAN UP THE ROAD IRELAND DID. 

3. DID WARTMAN SAY HE HATED OTHER PERSONS BECAUSE OF WHO USED TO OWN THE HOME THEY LIVED IN? WARTMAN IRELAND SAID THAT.

4. WARTMAN CHEATED PEOPLE AND STOLE AND SO DID THE WARTMAN CLONES FROM UP THE ROAD.

5. WAS IT PALFRY OR WAS IT HIM AND ACCOMPLICE WARTMANS FROM UP THE ROAD WHO BURNED DOWN MY HOUSE AND BURNED UP ALL OF MY POSSESSIONS?

I have to quit now, my neck for one thing and having trouble sitting there is a whole mess of Wartrman style behavior on the preceeding posts on this blog.

 

EVIDENCE BASED REASONING vs PRIVLEGE AND FEAR BASED REASONING

DEFERRING TO AUTHORITY AND ENDANGERED FEELINGS CREATES A FALSE REALITY WHICH DESTROYS THE REAL RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP AND PERSONAL FREEDOM AND SELF DETERMINATION.

What I want to talk about  is the incredible failure which is caused by the non evidentiary rights, powers and privileges based belief system that is damaging society, people and the planet. 

I have difficulty in  imposing reason upon events which occurred where damage was done to me or to my prospects or property and the clear and visible evidence is denied. I am subjected to a cross connected mess of overruling and entitlement and the absurdity of speculative fear or possible endangerment which persons who are thrusting themselves into the affairs of other persons think they can demand to assert to overrule all of the powers and privileges of ownership and escape responsibility and financial jeopardy on their part.

The strict legal interpretation of responsibility, particularly in the case of unnecessary or malicious actions, extends to individual and several liability without diminishment by apportionment. This means that all of the damages may be collected from each respondent and that the other participants, when they have the money or assets, and some do not, can be taxed with a large repayment on behalf of each respondent for the  damage that was done through their mutual, and even unbeknownst to others involved, actions. 

There is no Playing "Silly Bugger" or " Born Yesterday". When any person or group assumes a mantle of authority or presume to negatively affect another person or even to enter onto or to damage or to threaten or to jeopardize the quiet enjoyment of the ownership of the private property of another person they are also assuming the responsibility for and liability for any damage they do, individually, as a group or in a chain of actions manner. All parties can be made to assume responsibility for the actions of themselves and their accomplices and accessories who may not be capable of assuming their own financial responsibilities.

This responsibility extends to personal injury and loss of prospects as well. The contemporary affectation for the doctrine of " We deny without any evidence but purely as an obstructive technique" and through citing the imperative overrule of the self interest permitted under the Capitalist System. Personal injury and loss of prospects is a matter known best  and only by the victim of such loss. It is not a matter admitted known to the perpetrators of the damage as their denial of such attests to. There is no evidence to back a denial of responsibility for the actions they or their associates perpetrated unless they have witnesses or video tape  or diary evidence to back their denial of responsibility or even, absurdly, of the existence of the damage they have done to a living BREATHING COMPLAINING TESTIFYING PLAINTIFF.

VIDEO COURT

WILL THE CORONA VIRUS FORCE " COURT BY VIDEO "

What would be very interesting personally is that the Law Officers would no longer be able to play at " We are in danger so we must have several armed Sheriffs hovering around you as you read your writ and pleadings. "

In addition, there would possibly, especially in a time of a Lockdown, be an audience of interested viewers as was the case in Physical Courtrooms in the past though not now with the Virus around.

There will be an opportunity to create visual and video and animation graphics and present them. 

The next step would be to cut the connection between the Lawyers and the Judges by having a random and unknown assignment of cases to be deliberated.

I would enjoy seeing a presentation of the verbal submissions and judgements through avatars which would be randomly assigned so neither Judges nor lawyers would know who they were dealing with. 

 

WILL VIDEO COURT RE-ESTABLISH THAT VICTORY IN TRIALS AND LITIGATION WOULD BE WON BY TRUE AND IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE PRESENTED ACCURATELY AND ANONYMOUSLY AND ARGUED EFFECTIVELY?