JUST ANOTHER DAY IN THE LIFE OF A BC CITIZEN DEALING WITH THE THIN SKINNED REACTIVE AGENCIES AND AGENTS OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA GOVERNMENT

I WAS INFORMED THAT EMAIL TO BRITISH COLUMBIA WOULD BE PROPERLY REDIRECTED TO THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT AGENCY BUT INSTEAD THIS EMAIL WAS BLOCKED BY frontcounter but it did receive an auto reply from John Horgan.  Lindon Collard Sun, Aug 22, 11:02 PM to frontcounterbc, John Horgan MLA, BC. 

I was thinking about how I had contemporaneously pursued each person who damaged my person, my property, or my prospects. When I contacted authorities I was REFUSED THE INFORMATION and evidence I needed to stop future damage or remedy past damage. When Government Authorities  are challenged they try to trump something up against me the complainant and damaged person and victim of a crime. There is no, no form of damage which can be done to persons, property or prospects without there being a criminal offence committed against the damaged entity by those who do the damage. "Oh they did not know", does not matter there are always crimes of negligence, failure to be in control or to properly observe or verify information to confer culpability. 

When I personally attempted to stop damage by contacting the organization or authority involved with the duty to control, identify, or investigate the otherwise unknown perpetrators, often, the perpetrators found out about the attempt to find them or prove their culpability for damage and then perpetrators or civil servants knowingly or unknowingly shielding the perpetrators made bogus complaints that they were in danger, to Police, or that they were being harassed, when in fact they had been harassing me, or denying me information or worse, damaging me, Lindon Collard, or my property or my prospects. 

WHEN REDACTION AND REFUSALS TO PROVIDE NECESSARY INFORMATION HIDE THE IDENTITY OF A CRIMINAL OR ALTER THE APPEARANCE OF AN EVENT OR A SITUATION SO AS TO MAKE LAWFUL RECOURSE IMPOSSIBLE THEN THE REDACTION AND REFUSALS ARE CRIMINAL OFFENCES AND THE PARTICIPANTS, ALL OF THEM, ARE CRIMINALS.

This post is nearly the same as the email I sent to frontcounter. Font size and punctuation and some compositional changes were made and the footnote below was added.

I uttered the Supreme Court Writ Collard vs Pincombe to expose collusion,  collusion planned to be implemented by deceitful Law Officers is as the precedent from the House of Lords states, "approaching the level of a Criminal Conspiracy". I sued to expose prevarication, the act of attempting to escape responsibility by defaming and discrediting the injured party.

THE CRIMES I SUED ABOUT ARE THE FACILITATING FACTORS WHICH ARE AIDED AND ABETTED AND EVEN FACILITATED BY THE FAILURE AND REFUSAL  OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND AGENCIES AND ELECTED OFFICIALS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OR TO REDACT IT SO IT IS USELESS