Monday, September 28, 2020

DISPLEASING PLEASING

ALL THE WOMEN HAD TO DO TO ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING WAS TO BE ABLE TO GET IT OUT OF DADDY OR HUSBAND.


MALE OBJECTION WAS SIMPLY A CHARACTER FLAW. IN MY CASE I WAS JUDGED TO BE "CHEAP". ANY TECHNIQUE TO OVERCOME THAT WAS ACCEPTABLE. I WOULD BE "SHOWN". I WOULD PAY AND BE PUNISHED AS WELL FOR BEING "CHEAP". 


DESPITE MY "CHEAP", THE EX- WIFE SPENT EVERYTHING I HAD, THEN SHE BORROWED ON MY HOUSE AND WAS GOING TO BORROW MORE FROM THE SUPER EXPENSIVE BAKERY INSTALLATION COMPANY.


MY EX-WIFE WOULD HAVE BORROWED EVERYTHING MULTIPLE TIMES ON THE SAME ASSET, NOT INTELLECTUALLY CAPABLE OF FULLY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LAW PUNISHED FRAUD, SHE WOULD ACCOMPLISH WHATEVER SHE WANTED TO BY LYING AS USUAL.


ALL THE MEN HAD TO DO WAS PLEASE THE WOMEN OR ELSE AND THAT IS A HELL OF A WAY TO RUN FAMILIES AND BUSINESS AFFAIRS AND BORROWING! 

No comments:

Post a Comment

THE PEOPLE WHO WORK AT THE RCMP AND THE CRD RIP OFF THE TAX MONEY I PAY.

  TRUE LEFT I PAY AN INORDINATE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAX. ALLEGEDLY A LOT OF MY $50+K/ANNUM TAX IS TO PAY FOR POLICE AND BY-LAW SERVICES. May ...