ONCE AGAIN THE PROBABILITY OF EVIDENCE AND THE DIAGNOSIS OF INJURY INDICATE THAT I HAVE A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY. LAW OFFICERS WANT TO WIN SO THEY IGNORE EVIDENCE OFBRAIN INJURY TO WIN!
I have declared that I thought head injury had severly hampered and disabled me and I attended at medical specialists appointments and at the Provincial Psychaitrist and I have written letters to authorities and politicians. Collapses I have endured lately have caused injury and re-injury to my neck, my back, legs and knees. Brain Injury is a likely factor in the propensity to collapse although the hopelessness caused by being attacked instead of assisted when injured is a terrible and terrifying negative aspect to this wide ranging lifechanging situation.
HEAD INJURY IN 1963 AT THE CNR WAS IGNORED OR COVERED UP BUT RE-INTRODUCED WHEN I WAS SAID TO BE "ACCIDENT PRONE". To discredit me as a passenger.
IN 1967 A LEFT TURNING CAR HIT ME AND THREW ME ONTO MY HELMETED HEAD. VIRTUAL PARALYSIS RESULTED FOR A FEW MONTHS, IT SEEMED TO BE A SPINAL INJURY ONLY. HEAD INJURY WAS IGNORED BUT EACH INJURY CAUSES MORE CHRONIC DISABILITY AND THE NEXT TIME I EXPERIENCED TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY IT WAS ACCOMPANIED BY NECK INJURY AND ONCE AGAIN HEAD INJURY VIRTUAL PARALYSIS WAS IGNORED BUT IT WAS ENDURED FOREVER AND EVER.
TONIC IMMOBILITY, COLLAPSE IMMOBILITY, SHELL SHOCK AND SWAYBACK MAY REQUIRE A PHYSICAL COMPONENT IN THE INJURY.
The classic wartime Shell Shock Victim has likely been subjected to detonations nearby damaging his brain if not to other physical blows to the body and head.
In cases of Tonic Immobility, childhood abuse is said to be a factor. The unsupported position one finds one self in is a factor as a child or later as an adult. Are blows to the body and head a factor? My childhood abuse was facilitated by a great number of blows to the head, wrenches of the neck and back and by throwing adult weight onto me as I lay supine.
The Police Officer is looking for a win. A successful investigation, raid and prosecution will be an aid to future promotion. Of course this means that some citizen will be punished with fines or imprisonment. There will have been the cost of hiring a lawyer or a large ammount of work to learn how to defend against a charge only to run into the Law Officers' ironclad self interest.
In addition the Crown will keep prejudicial records of the arrest whether the citizen whom the Police Officer is having a "win" on is guilty or not guilty.
LAWYERS ARE SO VAIN AND SELF INTERESTED THAT A RESOLUTION TO LITIGATION MUST INCLUDE "WINS" FOR BOTH LAWYERS AND MOST CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE DISPOSED OF BY PLEAS WHICH HAVE THE SAME EFFECT I BELIEVE.
My ex-wife declared she was unhappy, I had to go. This was her last chance "to get money". She was going to have a big win and my losing everything would not be enough she "wanted me in jail or on the street". Enhancing her "win" would be my total destruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment