SLOPPY LAWYERS-SLOPPY LAW

REPEATEDLY I BECOME AWARE OF INCOMPLETE AND ERRONIOUS AND JUST PLAIN UNLEARNED LITIGATION

There is a failure to root out the real meaning of statutes. There is a failure to analyze and be aware of absurd statements and interpretations of Law.

Here is an example of what I think is an important tool to remedy loss and also to act as a deterrent to collusion which is often in actuality a criminal conspiracy:

Individual and several liability undiminished by apportionment

That means every plaintif on whom a judgement of liability is adjucitated is liable for all the damage done. Further, if some plaintiffs judged against are incapable financially, the other plaintiffs would have to pay their totality of judgement against a loss. Undiminished by apportionment means exactly that. The judgement could also accumulate to a large ammount if a person or agency with assets, including a pension fund or corporation, was liable together with or for sheltering or being an asset of many respondents.

 When a GROUP OF PEOPLE GANG UP ON, OR COLLUDE TO DEFEAT another citizen even the piffling awards made by Canadian Courts to indemnify the citizen from damage could add up to a lot of money, each miscreant paying in full for the damage they did and even more perhaps for some unactionable surrogates they used. I would like to include the unknown persons shielded by "Privacy" Laws as liable and not collectable from and put additional multiples of the damage the plaintiff experienced all of on those who are shielding such as Fake 911 callers. Authorities and Agencies and Politicians know who they are shielding and could reemburse themselves.