CHARLES BARKLEY ON THE WHITE WOMAN`S USE OF THEIR POLICE POWER SAFETY NET. `IN DANGER` WHILE BEING THE AGRESSOR

CNN Smerconish hosted Charles Barkley, NBA Star, whose interview can be viewed, but I am narrowly focussed on one part of his commentary which refers to Amy Cooper. "I am going to tell the Police that a black man is harassing me`` is how Barkley quoted her. He said `That was her safety net`

I FIND THAT CANARD TO BE USED LIKE A SHIELD AND A SUIT OF ARMOR TO OVERWHELM ME BY PROXY OR THROUIGH DECEIT AS THE WOMEN KNOW THEY ARE BEYOND REPROACH AND THEY HAVE POLICE BACKUP

PAINT ME BLACK

I REALLY DO THINK THAT THE POLICY OF DEFERRING TO WOMEN AND AGENCIES HAS PAINTED ME BLACK.

The presently practiced methodology of enforcement criminalized so many not criminal and not harmful acts that it is really easy to claim that I am offending.

A continuing record of complaints is maintained regardless of the obvious attempts to manipulate a response against a person who is not harming anyone.

MAKE ENOUGH OF EVEN RIDICULOUS COMPLAINTS AND THE TARGET OF THE COMPLAINTS IS PAINTED BLACK.

CNN Smerconish hosted Charles Barkley, NBA Star, whose interview can be viewed, but I am narrowly focussed on one part of his commentary which refers to Amy Cooper. "I am going to tell the Police that a black man is harassing me`` is how Barkley quoted her. He said `That was her safety net`. 

I view the ``Woman in Danger`` canard to be more than a safety net, more like a suit of armor conferring invulnerability which would allow a WOMAN TO TRESPASS, ORDER A MAN AROUND ON HIS OWN PROPERTY, MAKE ORGANIZED FALSE COMPLAINTS; AUTHORITIES ALLOWED THE THEFT OF INHERITANCES AND EXTORTION OF MONEY AND THE IMPOSITION OF UNPAID LABOR. Men were vulnerable. A Woman could unquestioned have Police intervene against a Man. On Vancouver Island, BC, Canada you do not have to be a Black Man, any Man will do as grist for the Woman`s and Police Mill. 

CAPRICIOUS JUSTICE: By-Law allegations used to invade property:      ...

                                Capricious Justice      April 27, 2017.

Police are granted limited access to the homes and property of residents and owners in case of life threatening emergency or when a judge signs a warrant. Criminal intent on the part of the resident or owner of property being invaded is required for the criminal process and warrant to be used. 

I cannot understand why the moronic device which is used to overrule Law is tolerated by persons who profess to possess extraordinary intelligence. The function of Law is to protect persons and property. The misuse of Law is to use Law to frighten, dominate, intimidate and endanger persons.

The moronic device is that when an infraction of a by-law is suspected, a citation is issued: the alleged infraction is often, invariably in my case, an alleged error of omission, a failure to comply with the often ridiculous and unsupportable interpretations the violation generating martinets espouse.  The citations used repeatedly to intimidate and assault with police, were ruled to be unenforceable and the alleged offence unproven whenever I could challenge in the courts.

The by-law officer becomes the relentless punisher, gathers up as many police or other goons as possible and heads out to violate the written and spoken orders of the property owner to stay off his property, to leave him alone, to find the legal way to serve the quack documents.