CROSS EXAMINATION UNDER OATH

I have cross examined several dozen people under Oath.

I would sincerely wish to cross examine under oath the writer of the disparaging comments about myself and my work.

 

I had to cross examine mostly Police as I defended myself against tickets.

This situation arises when persons utter false accusations and I get to test the truth. The accusation can be as simple as an accusation leading to a speeding ticket when one was not speeding. It could be as complicated as the collusion and prevarication in the Pincombe caused Motor Vehicle Accident with a false accident report by RCMP  member House. I have the report and I HAVE THE CAR I WAS DRIVING WHICH SHOWS WHAT WAS THE TRUTH IN THE BENT METAL. I cannot comprehend why a sworn statement could be created when the damage to either vehicle would clearly indicate where his vehicle collided with my full size Oldsmobile.

At ICBC deranged Bink Loftheren or thereabouts screamed at injured me "You are making me late for my Vacation" and "Yew were going eiightyy fiiive milesh an Hour". Pure crazy. I carried a body pack tape recorder under my right arm in those days. I created a dated signed transcript. I have it. I have the car. 

RCMP member House had to make the accident report match the lies of Pincombe and his neighbor, prevaricating to try to say I caused the accident where he was on the wrong side of the road. Regardless of the forensic evidence in where the vehicles damaged each other House uttered  A REPORT. I HAVE IT. I HAVE THE CAR. There is an additional incredible collusion, conspiracy to obstruct justice, as the charges against Pincombe were dealt with without me.

I would sincerely wish to cross examine, under oath, the writer of all the disparaging comments made about myself and my work and see if a scintilla of actual fact could be found when the writer had to be truthful or face consequences. 

I have no problem with cross examination as I do rigorously adhere to truth, evidence and Law.

In my posts I rigorously adhere to truth. Other people who do not share my ethical reasons to speak only truth should consider what would happen if their veracity and reputation were important and they were cross examined about their published statements to test the truth thereof and assess their credibility.

I recently was ticketed for the second time in thirty years for speeding, which I was doing. I immediately went to the Motor Vehicle Branch office and I paid the ticket in full, forthwith. There is no way that I can lie, so if I was speeding I was speeding. It is the same with fake 911 calling and lying and stealing, particularly when I supply the evidence to the Crown and I am the victim.