THERE WOULD ALWAYS BE A SCRUM OF RELATIVES READY TO DIVERT BENEFITS AWAY FROM ME WHEN I INHERITED MONEY. ANYTIME I HIT ROCK BOTTOM FINANCIALLY, I WAS TOTALLY ALONE.
MY PATERNAL GRANDFATHER'S TRUST FUND TO ME AT 18 WAS SEIZED BY MY MOTHER IN 1964. I LIVED IN A FREEZING SHARED TENEMENT ROOM, I ACTUALLY STARVED AS I WROTE UNB FINAL EXAMS.
MOTHER HAD MY MONEY I WAS
"UNDER HER AUTHORITY"
IN 1984 MY SIBLING FAMILY THREATENED THAT I WOULD BE DISINHERITED FROM MY FATHER'S MONEY UNLESS I BORROWED MY FATHER'S MONEY FROM MY MOTHER TO FINANCE MY WIFE'S ILL CONCEIVED BUSINESS VENTURE.
Edit note: It just occurred to me, total recall can take a long time.
My ex wife had sucked me dry except for about ten ounces of 999.9 fine gold and that is why the "Her" business thing was dreamed up. Trixie wanted to keep on spending and take power over me and they, all of them, wanted to punish me.
My Mother said "If only you were on payments it would be so good for you".
I had to sell my gold bars, I had to borrow $57,500. more and then Mother cut off financing, said she had changed her mind and wanted "her",money back. My Father's money, not her's.
I owed $10,000. to my aunt, $47,500. to the Women's Gang in the Collard Family and I had to go and sell my stash (I had grown 2 nice plants for myself) to pay the rent on the store. Then I descended into poverty coupled with 70 hour weeks of unpaid work. It is horrible with women in charge.
I SAID I WOULD PAY THE $47,500. BACK WITH $475./mo PAYMENTS, 100 PAYMENTS.
THAT WAS A LOT OF MONEY IN 1984
FOR A MAN WITH NO EARNINGS ALLOWED TO BE RETAINED BY THE WIFE SPENDING EVERY DOLLAR THIS WAS A CRUSHING BURDEN TO PAINFULLY AND UNNECESSARILY PAY MILLIONAIRES BECAUSE MOTHER WANTED "UNDER THE TABLE" PAYMENTS. WHAT ABOUT ME?
THERE HAD BEEN NO MENTION OF INTEREST PAYMENTS, JUST REPAYMENT.
Then there was the woman's twist, it would be collected as interest instead of being what I had been forced to agree to do, principal repayment.
I REFUSED TO PAY INTEREST. I PAID OFF ALL OF THE PRINCIPAL THEN ANDREW RESTOLE THE PRINCIPAL I HAD PAID AND MORE MONEY AS INTEREST FROM MY FATHER ESTATE FROM MY INHERITANCE.
THIS IS A TAX EVASION CRIME.
(* While they are doing that they are also holding my mail and stealing my uncle Albert's Inheritance he left to me.)
*
ANDREW COLLARD, MY BROTHER, AND MY MOTHER CHARGED ME THIRTEEN AND THREE QUARTERS PERCENT INTEREST ON MY WIFE`S DEBT WHICH I WAS DEEMED TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BY COLLECTING MY PRINCIPAL REPAYMENT AS INTEREST. IT WAS NOT INTEREST. THEY DID NOT REPORT THE FUNDS RECEIVED WERE EARNINGS AS INTEREST. "UNDER THE TABLE", PRINCIPAL CAN BE REPAID IN CASH AND THERE IS NO ONE TO NOTIFY. IF THE MONEY IS KEPT AS INTEREST AS ANDREW AND MOTHER DEMANDED AFTER THE FACT, AND WHICH I REFUSED TO DO, FOR 16 YEARS UNTIL 2001, THAT IS 16 YEARS OF INCOME TAX EVASION.
*
I TOLD ANDREW THAT MOTHER HAD AGREED TO RETURN ALL OF THE FUNDS SHE HAD RECEIVED FROM ME WHEN I WAS THREATENING TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION. ``WHEN I DIE YOU WILL GET ALL OF YOUR PAYMENTS YOU MADE BACK AND SO WILL ANDREW. JOANNE DID NOT MAKE ANY PAYMENTS.`` WHAT DO I GET TO SUE OVER IN THAT CASE? I STILL LOST BY NOT HAVING MONEY BUT I WOULD BE CAST AS UNREASONABLE. WHEN I TOLD ANDREW ABOUT HIS HE SAID HE DID NOT BELIEVE ME AND HE REFUSED TO HONOR MY MOTHER`S AGREEMENT.
*
WHEN THEY TOOK MY INHERITED MONEY AS INTEREST IN 2000 OR 2001 AND THEY DID NOT REPORT THE EARNINGS TO THE CRA they COMMITTED ANOTHER OFFENCE OF TAX EVASION.
*
* IN 1984, THE FAMILY AND MY WIFE HAD STOLEN MY MAIL AND WERE HIDING THE WILL WHICH LEFT ME EVERYTHING MY UNCLE ALBERT OWNED.
THAT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE WOMEN FELT THEY WERE ENTITLED TO COMMIT.
THAT IS NOT THE ONLY INSTANCE OF INHERITANCE INTERFERENCE, GIFT DIVERSION AND BANK ACCOUNT FUNDS DIVERSION WHICH I KNOW ABOUT.
WHAT ELSE DID THEY STEAL ?
THE WOMEN OF THE COLLARD FAMILY WERE "TOTALLY IN AGREEMENT". MY BROTHER ALSO HE SAID "MOTHER AND I THOUGHT THAT IF YOU KNEW YOU WERE GOING TO INHERIT ALBERT'S MONEY YOU WOULD NOT TRY HARD ENOUGH".
EVERYBODY GOT A SLICE AND SOMETHING NICE AND I
GOT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, NOT A CENT, NOT A SCENT OF THE MANY ITEMS IN MY UNCLE ALBERT'S CURIO COLLECTION.
I WAS TO INHERIT MY UNCLE ALBERT'S HOUSE; I NEVER GOT TO SEE THE HOUSE AGAIN. I FOUND OUT TEN YEARS LATER.
I AM IN AN ALL ALONE PHASE NOW. I HAVE TONIC IMMOBILITY BIG TIME.
THERE IS NO ONE TO EVEN MOVE THE GARBAGE CANS OF GARBAGE ( SIX YEARS, SEVEN CANS) AND THE GARBAGE CANS OF EMPTY CAT FOOD CANS, ALL OF THEM PICTURESQUELY LINED UP ALONG THE NICE CONCRETE WALK WAY I CONSTRUCTED 43 YEARS AGO, NO ONE.
Edit post
I WOKE UP THIS MORNING AT THREE AM WITH THIS ON MY MIND.
I HAVE EDITED THE POST REMEMBERING A BIT, AND CORRELATING A LOT.
MY LONG TIME WING GIRL ANNE AND MYSELF WERE TALKING WITH A LAWYER.
HE SAID "DID THE TWO OF YOU USED TO WORK FOR THE FBI?''
THAT WAS BECAUSE OF THE WAY I, IN PARTICULAR, COULD FIGURE OUT WHEN PEOPLE BROKE THE LAW AND I WAS DOUBLY DEADLY WITH MY RESEARCH AND PRODUCTION EXPEDITER, IQ 143 WITH A DOZEN UVIC COURSES AND EXTRA TRAINING AND SKILLS TO WRITE WRITS AND DO LEGAL RESEARCH.
PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW LAW AND THINK THAT THEY CAN DO BAD THINGS TO OTHER PEOPLE AND THEY THINK THAT THEY ARE NOT ENGAGING IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. ANY DECEPTION OR THEFT IN BUSINESS, CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL OFFENCE.. CHANGING WILLS WITHOUT THE INPUT AND CONSENT OF BENEFICIARIES IS A CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. PRESSURING OLD PEOPLE TO CHANGE THEIR WILLS IS A CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. CHANGING THEIR WILLS AFTER THEY CREATED THEM THROUGH FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE. THESE PERSONS ARE CRIMINALS WHO ARE PUNISHABLE FOR THE COMMISSION OF INDICTABLE OFFENCES ANYONE WHO AIDS THEM OR HIDES THEIR CULPABILITY IN ANY WAY IS GUILTY OF THE SAME INDICTABLE OFFENCE.
This can't be combined with what you've already added to your post.
This can't be combined with what you've already added to your post.
