I DID NOT CONSENT.

THERE IS A HIGH PROFILE RAPE TRIAL IN THE CANADIAN NEWS. THE GANG RAPE WAS ALLEGEDLY PERPETRATED BY FIVE CANADIAN JUNIOR HOCKEY PLAYERS.

A KEY ISSUE IS WHETHER THE YOUNG WOMAN CONSENTED TO HAVE SEX WITH THE FIVE MEN. 

IF CONSENT IS NOT FREELY GIVEN THE SEX ACT IS A CRIMINAL RAPE.

I HAVE REFERRED TO THE FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION OF MEN AS "THE RAPE OF THE MALE".

WHEN MY MOTHER TOOK MY BANK ACCOUNT WHEN I WAS SIXTEEN, I DID NOT CONSENT. WHEN MY MOTHER TOOK MY PATERNAL GRANDFATHER'S TRUST HE LEFT TO ME WHEN I TURNED EIGHTEEN I DID NOT CONSENT. 

WHEN MY MOTHER TOOK ALL OF MY EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY CHECKS WHEN I WAS A FULL TIME UNIVERSITY STUDENT LIVING ON LUNCH MEAT SANDWICHES, I DID NOT CONSENT.

WHEN I WAS FORCED TO FINANCE MY EX-WIFE'S THOUGHTLESS BUSINESS, I DID NOT CONSENT. SHE SAID "YOUR WHOLE FAMILY IS IN AGREEMENT. YOU ARE GOING TO FINANCE A MAJOR BUSINESS FOR ME OR I WILL DIVORCE YOU AND YOU WILL LOSE ALL OF YOUR ASSETS TO LEGAL FEES AND YOUR MOTHER WILL DISINHERIT YOU FROM YOUR FATHER'S MONEY." I DID NOT CONSENT. I WAS FORCED TO LOSE ALL OF MY ASSETS ANYWAY.

WHEN MY UNCLE ALBERT LEFT ME HIS MONEY MOTHER HID IT FROM ME AND I DID NOT GET A CENT. I DID NOT CONSENT.

DESPITE MY DOING EVERYTHING I WAS FORCED TO DO UNDER THREAT OF DIVORCE MY EX-WIFE DIVORCED ME AND FORCED ME TO PAY HER ALMOST TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS. I DID NOT CONSENT. I TOLD HER SHE HAD LOST ANY RIGHT TO A SETTLEMENT DUE TO HER HAVING TOOK OVER AS THE "BREAD WINNER" AND SPENT ALL FAMILY FUNDS AND SHE HAD EXTORTED ME FOR ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER MONTH IN LIEU OF THE WELFARE SHE WOULD GET IF SHE DID NOT HAVE ME.

I DID NOT CONSENT TO MY AUNT ANNETTE'S BEQUEST TO ME BEING CUT TO LESS THAN HALF OF WHAT SHE HAD WANTED TO LEAVE ME, $300,000 WAS TAKEN FROM ME. I DID NOT CONSENT. 

ALMOST THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS WAS TAKEN FROM MY INHERITANCE FROM MY FATHER. I DID NOT CONSENT TO THIS LAST THEFT.

LYING IS THE PRECURSOR TO SOME TYPES OF INSANITY.

 

DOES LYING LEAD TO NEUROTIC AND INSANE BEHAVIOR AND BELIEF?

LYING TO POLICE TO SAVE YOURSELF IS UNETHICAL AND IMMORAL BUT IT DOES NOT CAUSE ANYTHING LIKE THE DANGER AND DAMAGE DONE BY LYING TO THE POLICE ABOUT SOMEBODY ELSE. 

MANY PERSONS HAVE ADOPTED THE  SOCIOPATH'S INSANE USE OF LIES TO CAUSE DISENFRANCHISEMENT AND TROUBLE FOR INNOCENT PEOPLE. 

IT IS MY CONTENTION THAT THIS IS NOT RATIONAL BEHAVIOR, IT IS INSANE. 

THIS IS ANOTHER DISSERTATION ABOUT LYING. THE LAST PARAGRAPH IS ABOUT THE INSANITY WHICH LYING CAUSES.

DECEPTION IS THE TAP ROOT OF EVIL

DECEPTION IS THE TOOL OF THE DISHONEST WITH WHICH VICTIMS ARE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER OR DISPOSSESSED OF THEIR PROPERTY.

Deception functions as a tap root from off of which other evil acts are enabled. 

The type of Deception I am writing about is not the harmless deception of a magic show or theatrical entertainment. 

It is the Deception which lures the victim and covers theft and falsely accuses which I am referring to. 

Deception can also be used to coerce another person or to defraud another person or to justify or nullify bad actions which damage another person or their property.

I am going to state that as I discourse upon the subject: What is really "Emotionally Motivated" and what is Sin or Mentally Ill motivation. The result  should be the same for any of the flawed motivations. The Emotionally or mental illness motivated or sinful persons should be disregarded and they should be constrained from acting against innocent persons. While the other Sins or Crimes are important the worst of Crimes are Theft and Assault and Murder.

MURDER AND THEFT AND ASSAULT ARE THE MOST DEADLY OF SINS, THE MOST CRIMINALLY DAMAGING TO VICTIMS AND THE PRODUCT OF THE MOST DEPRAVED MINDS. 

The act of theft or vandalism or arson which removes a person's property or destroys it is a terrible crime which is under estimated in the damage it does by those who have not experienced the loss personally. Assault in all of its forms does mental and physical damage which endures, diminishing life's experience. Murder does end everything for the victim, life is over forever.

Truthfulness is a very important virtue and deception is a very common failing. For everyone to be ethical and truthful is a necessary foundational principle for a cooperative society. What can one think when in our supposedly civilized society armed men will be kicking at one's doors based on lies, sent as a part of a deception. What is worse is that there is no way to exercise the lawful right to prosecute or litigate against the persons and organizations that participated in a false raid without a warrant and without any probable cause or evidence, just the Deception.

Innumerable times I have encountered and documented Deception. Most Egregious was the declaration by various persons that all they would have to do was "Say" or Lie and Courts or Police or Sheriffs would move to act against me. Do you have any idea how unsafe this makes a badly crippled man feel about dealing with Authorities in public or even at his own home? How is it possible, if lies are acted upon and not acted against when they are exposed, to fight back against Deception?

The Mentally Ill exultation is entirely discrediting which accompanies the declaration of the supremacy of lies over evidence or the act of Lying or Faking Danger or a 911 call or a plea to get a Divorce and all the money and property- Such danger! But while the Deceptive Danger Fakers call for assistance, why are they exulting, why are they triumphant? They are supposed to be in grave danger. Does not the exulting make it clear who not in danger and who is the Aggressor and who is actually in danger? 

DECEPTION IS THE TAP ROOT OF EVIL

DECEPTION IS THE TOOL OF THE DISHONEST WITH WHICH VICTIMS ARE LED TO THE SLAUGHTER OR DISPOSSESSED OF THEIR PROPERTY.

I HAD UNDERESTIMATED THE DANGER AND THE EFFECT OF THE FALSE ACCUSATION, DEFAMATION AND FAKE 911 CALLS I HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO.

CITIZENS ARE NOT AWARE OF THE FACT THAT A CONVICTION EVEN FOR A MINOR OFFENCE LEADS TO HARSH SENTENCING FOR ANY CONVICTION LATER. I BELIEVE THAT HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUS COULD HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED AFTER JUST A FEW CONVICTIONS FOR PIFFLING AND IMAGINARY OFFENCES.

 

POLICE KEEP RECORDS OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS BUT NOT OF THE DISPROOF THEREOF. THE POLICE WILL TREAT ME AS IF THE ACCUSATIONS WERE CRIMINAL OFFENCES I SHOULD HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF AND THE POLICE ARE MAD AT ME FOR GETTING OFF.

IN ADDITION, ALL OF THE FAKE 911 CALLERS AND POLICE AND DOG CATCHERS AND BY-LAW OFFICERS ARE HOPING THAT I WILL ASSAULT THE POLICE AS MY EX-WIFE HAD LIED, "HE WILL FLY RIGHT OFF THE HANDLE". 

My original oil painting, Raid at Otter Point.

I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN TERRORIZED AND ANGUISHED BY THE FAKE ATTEMPTS TO CONVICT ME OF AN OFFENSE. I HAVE A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION DERIVED DOCUMENT WHERE THE SOOKE RCMP WRITE TO OTHER POLICE TELLING THEM "COLLARD IS AN ENVIRONMENTALIST SEEKING CONFRONTATION AND MUST BE CHARGED". ALL EVENTS HAPPENED ON MY OWN SOLELY OWNED PROPERTY AND WERE ABOUT MY OWN PROPERTY AND AGAINST MY GENERATING WRITS AND COMPLAINTS ABOUT DAMAGE DONE TO MY PROPERTY WHEN THE SOOKE RCMP WROTE THE "COLLARD IS AN ENVIRONMENTALIST SEEKING CONFRONTATION..." LIE. I HAVE NEVER GONE ONTO ANYONE ELSE'S PROPERTY.

I, FORTUNATELY WAS ABLE TO DEFEND MYSELF AND ON ONE OCCASION I WAS ABLE TO HIRE AN EFFECTIVE LAWYER.

ON ALL THE OTHER OCCASIONS WHEN I HIRED A LAWYER THE LAWYER I HIRED  PRACTICED OR WANTED TO PRACTICE THE BACKROOM DEALING THAT BC LAWYERS DO INSTEAD OF LITIGATING BASED ON LAW AND THE EVIDENCE. 

MY EX-WIFE AND MY GIRLFRIEND'S EX- BOYFRIEND DEFAMED ME AND I COULD NO LONGER HIRE A LAWYER BUT I DID GET REPRESENTATION ONCE IN 2001. 

I HAVE PRACTICED AN ASSIDUOUS COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAW AND REGULATION, EXCEPT REGARDING MARIJUANA, AND NONE OF THE ATTEMPTS TO CHARGE ME WITH "ANYTHING" WERE SUCCESSFUL.

REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT I WAS NEVER CONVICTED I WAS JAILED FOR FIVE DAYS AS I WAS BEING TRANSFERRED AROUND AND I PERSONALLY PROVED IN PROVINCIAL COURT THAT THE CHARGE WAS BASED ON LIES. ON OTHER OCCASIONS I WAS ARRESTED AND  JAILED FOR HOURS MORE THAN ONCE.

MY SIBLING FAMILY AND MY EX-WIFE AND PERSONS WHO HELPED HER SAID THINGS AND DID THINGS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO TERRORIZE ME INTO ACTING IN SUBSERVIENCE TO THEIR DEMANDS. THOSE ACTIONS AND STATEMENTS CAUSED ME TO COLLAPSE, CONVULSE AND TO BECOME VIRTUALLY PARALYZED.

 

"MY LAWYER AND I KNOW ABOUT YOUR NECK AND YOUR BACK" TRIXIE AKA BETTY SAID."WE ARE GOING TO PUT SO MUCH PRESSURE ON YOU THAT YOUR NECK AND YOUR BACK ARE GOING TO 'GO' AND THEN YOU ARE GOING TO DO SOMETHING YOU CAN'T GET OUT OF".

THAT MUST BE WHAT HER LAWYER, TYLER LUCCIES, THOUGHT BECAUSE MY EX-WIFE KNEW I COULD NOT NOR WOULD NOT INJURE ANYONE OR DAMAGE ANYTHING UNLESS TRIXIE DASHEVSKY AKA BETTY COLLARD  WAS EVEN MORE DELUDED AND/OR INSANE THAN I THOUGHT SHE WAS.

JUST MEETING AND PLANNING TO DO THIS IS CRIMINAL CONSPIRING. ANYONE ACTING ON OR TELLING OTHER PEOPLE OF THIS PLAN AND MY DISABILITY HAS COMMITTED  A CRIMINAL OFFENCE.

AFTER THE POLICE CAME HERE  SEVERAL TIMES I HAVE NEVER FELT RELAXED AND CONTENT AT MY HOME.

I STILL CANNOT STOP LOOKING OUT FOR THE POLICE THIRTY THREE YEARS LATER.

FROM 

DISABLED NOT COMPENSATED

I HAVE SUCH A HARD TIME TO JUST STAND OR WALK THAT I THINK WHAT HAPPENS IF I AM CONFRONTED OR TERRIFIED OR DISMAYED IS THAT I LOSE MY CONCENTRATION AND I COLLAPSE. I HAVE ALSO EXPERIENCED CONVULSION.

I AM ALWAYS VERY CLOSE TO LOSING MY EQUILIBRIUM OR THE STABILITY OF MY KNEES OR MY BACK AND COLLAPSING WHOLLY OR ON ONE SIDE.

I MAY HAVE BECOME VIRTUALLY PARALYZED IN 1968 AND AGAIN IN 1970 TO 1974 NOT ONLY FROM FROM MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH INJURIES BUT ALSO  FROM BEING DISMAYED AT THE REFUSAL TO PAY MY OUT OF WORK INSURANCE CLAIM WHICH POLICY I HAD PAID FOR EVERY MONTH FOR MANY YEARS.

GRADUALLY I BECAME CAPABLE OF DOING MORE WORK AND UNDERTAKING MORE ACTIVITIES BUT ONLY USUALLY TWO DAYS PER WEEK FROM 1974 UNTIL LATE 1977 WHEN I WAS ABLE TO WORK FULL TIME AT MY JEWELRY FACTORY AND THEN TO COMPLETE MY HALF BUILT HOME IN 1980 AND TO WORK LATER SIX DAYS PER WEEK IN VICTORIA.

IN DECEMBER OF 1986 I WAS INJURED IN A MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH I DID NOT CAUSE AND I HIRED BARBARA YATES.

THIS IS A SIMILAR CRASH TO MINE IN A SIMILAR CAR WHICH WAS STRUCK BY INGRAM'S LEFT TURNING CAR AND PROPELLED INTO THE POLE. IN ADDITION THE POLE WAS STEEL NOT WOOD, AND THE MOTOR VEHICLE CRASH HAPPENED AT NIGHT IN VANCOUVER. I DID NOT STRIKE AND BREAK THE WINDSCREEN EITHER.

ICBC DECLARED THAT I WAS "WORTHLESS" AND I SHOULD BE DENIED A SETTLEMENT WHICH I THINK THE COMBINATION OF ACCIDENT INJURY AND THAT FARCICAL IMPOSITION OF WORTHLESSNESS CAUSING DISMAY PRECIPITATED ME INTO A STATE OF FUGUE.

I RECOVERED SO I COULD ROLLERBLADE FROM 1998 TO 2001. BEFORE THAT, IN THE EARLY 1990'S I COULD PERFORM LIVE MUSIC. AS LONG AS I WAS ABLE TO CONCENTRATE ON MUSIC, DANCE OR ROLLERBLADING I COULD KEEP ON GOING. WHEN THE POLICE WERE SICCED ONTO ME I WOULD LOSE MY ABILITY TO CONCENTRATE ON WHAT I WAS DOING AND I HAD TO WATCH OUT FOR TRESPASSERS OR POLICE WHO WERE OUT TO GET ME FOR SOMETHING AND WHO I FEARED WOULD HARM ME.

I COLLAPSE WHEN I AM DISMAYED. SEVERAL YEARS AFTER MY BROTHER ANDREW ADMINISTERED A CRIPPLING TEN FINGER TAI CHI BLOW TO MY CHEST. JUST FROM SEEING HIM I WAS DISMAYED AND I BEGAN TO COLLAPSE. 

I ALSO COLLAPSE WHEN I AM DISMAYED AT THE TERRIBLE STATE MY LAND WAS REDUCED TO BY THE TREE REMOVAL AND SOIL STRIPPING AND DITCH DIGGING THAT THE LOCAL CRIMINAL GANG DID.

WHETHER THE GANG IS IMPORTING PROHIBITED DRUGS OR RIPPING OFF DECENT FAMILY SUPPORTING MEN OR TERRORIZING PERSONS WHO HAVE FOUND THEM OUT AND ARE REPORTING ABOUT THEIR ACTIVITIES:

TREAT ANY CRIMINAL ACT AS THE BASIS OF A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND IN ADDITION TREAT ENABLING THAT ACT AS CRIMINAL FELICITATION.

February 23, 2025

I HAVE ALWAYS MAINTAINED THAT MY EX-WIFE'S MISUSE OF THE PROTECTIONS OF  DIVORCE LEGISLATION TO EXTORT ME, TO FORCE ME TO DO LABOR I DID NOT WANT TO DO WHICH WAS VERY HARD ON ME, AND TO GIVE HER THE MONEY, WAS A CRIMINAL ACT.  

IT JUST OCCURRED TO ME: HOW COULD MY WIFE FINANCE THE DIVORCE ACTIONS ABOUT WHICH SHE SAID "YOU WILL LOSE ALL OF YOUR ASSETS TO LEGAL FEES"? 

IT WAS THE LAWYERS AND THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LAW SOCIETY WHO WERE ENGAGING IN THE CRIMINAL FELICITATION OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE AS THEY MADE THEMSELVES AVAILABLE AND FINANCED HER CRIME.

THE BANNERS THAT CAN BE CLICKED ON TO ENTER MY BLOGS AND VIEW EVERYTHING I HAVE WRITTEN SINCE 2010 AND MANY OF MY PICTURES AND VIDEOS.

THERE ARE MANY MORE VIDEOS ON YOU TUBE. Search LINDON COLLARD to start finding my videos. 

Click on any banner to enter each multi-post blog.

Drunkycocamovision: The Blog

Drunky Cocomo is a cartoon Characture: A VISIONARY PROPHET. WITNESS ADOLPH COCAMO III's VISIONS, DREAMS, ECONOMIC LECTURES AND PROPHECIES ON DRUNKYCOCAMOVISION YOUTUBE CHANNEL.

 

CAPRICIOUS  JUSTICE

OPPOSITIONAL DEFIANT DISORDER

LIVE ROCK CRITIC

WWINKLES WONDERCRAFT WORKSHOP       new recently

THE CONFESSIONS OF AN EVIL EXTORTIONIST LIAR.                                    new

 CANADA EXPOSED FLQ

DODGELAW

MARIJUANA WARS

MARIJUANA CRITIC

TRUE LEFT

HATE    

LINDON COLLARD TOTAL RECALL

POLICE POWER SOCIOPATHS

CANADIAN PRIVACY LAWS MISUSED

DITZKREIG

MEN TOO

DISABLED NOT COMPENSATED

SHELL SHOCK LIFE

WWINKLES WONDERCRAFT WORKSHOP

LINDON COLLARD YOUTUBE CHANNELS

.

NEW YORK SEX GOSSIP WITH BENITO COCAMO

WASTE NOT WASTE NOT

WASTE NOT - WASTE NOT. Do not waste the Bounty of the Earth.The long term viability of the planet is essential to human and animal and plant life here on Earth. Just because there is an abundance of some raw materials and air and water can be used or destroyed easily does not mean that these resources do not have to be saved for future need. Do not waste lives and experience and time that could be well spent.

Click on any banner to enter the many posts in that blog.

Pass the cursor above this or any other "faint" print to turn it blue.

BEYOND GORING

WHAT CAN BE SAID ABOUT POLICE FORCES WHO GO BEYOND GORING? WHAT COULD POSSIBLY CREATE A NECESSITY TO ACT ON UNPROVEN SUSPICION AND GOSSIP, TO TRY TO SEIZE A MAN'S HOUSE AND INSTRUMENTS AND TOOLS AND TO SEND SPURIOUS DEFAMATIONS FAR

A TALE OF TORTURE AND FRAUD FROM "THE AGE OF LIES"

 

TORTURE CANADA <torturecanada@gmail.com>	1:19 PM (2 minutes ago)
to anewday1

torturecanada@gmail.com

Hi, TORTURE!

This is my paper mache' head of a Sooke RCMP as icon.

In 1996 That Sooke RCMP, Cpl. Hal Zeike, promoted later to Sergeant in RCMP Intelligence, forged documents echoing what my lying ex-wife said that I was "crazy, that I thought I was going to be a ROCK STAR " so Zeike forged documents that I was crazy which would mean that I could be held for 2 months which my Ex's lawyer told my Ex-Wife Trixie aka Betty she could sell my house even though I had paid her for it years before. She would claim the house had gone up in value and that was income to me if they sold off my house and she would get the money. I was five days in jail before the government psychiatrist said I was NOT CRAZY.

The Sheriff had chained me up hog tied at ankles wrists and waist with a chain like the one in the icon. It was in the unheated van for 6 hours, 4 at Vancouver Airport, that I was crippled so I never danced live on stage again.

I hired a lawyer who was unwilling to expose fellow lawyer Fritz Verhooven who made a complaint that he felt in danger in Vancouver, I never even met him. As I self represented cross examined him the Judge said "Watch this, you will never see anything like this again" as I began to expose Verhooven's false swearing of his complaint. There were up to 350 people in the Provincial  Court to see this happen.

I said when the Judge stayed the prosecution of myself "Bind this man over for trial without bail. An officer of the court misusing his position is a danger to the citizens in our society."

No one would prosecute him or Zeike even though Verhooven admitted under the Collard Cross, where I change subjects and time frames back and forth until no one can keep their lies straight, that he had uttered a false complaint in writing to Vancouver Police.

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

COLLARD CROSS

THE COLLARD CROSS IS A QUESTIONING METHODOLOGY DESIGNED TO EXPOSE LIES              AND TO FORCE WITNESSES TO TELL THE TRUTH

 The Lawyer's Handbook, as published in British Columbia Canada states :         "A LAWYER'S FIRST DUTY IS TO THE TRUTH" . This should click open.