MONTREAL AND MY WORKING CLASS ORIGINS: MY FATHER WAS FROM SAINT HENRY, WHICH LATER BECAME "NEW BRITTANY" THE HOME OF BLACK MONTREALERS. I NEVER HEARD OF MY FATHER'S ORIGIN COMMUNITY BEING CALLED ANYTHING ELSE BUT SAINT HENRY.

MY MOTHER'S FAMILY, DISPOSSESSED LITHUANIAN ARISTOCRATS WERE FROM VILLE EMARD WHERE I LIVED AND MY MOTHER ORIGINATED, A WORKING CLASS COMMUNITY, JUDGED TO BE A LOT BETTER THAN SAINT HENRY AND THE ''POINT'', POINT SAINT CHARLES.

IT WAS PART OF OUR CULTURE TO NOT HAVE ANY MONEY UNTIL WE GOT A JOB. THUS WE DID NOT HAVE A RESENTMENT TOWARDS HAVING TO WORK.

THE PROBLEM THAT CAUSED WAS THAT SCHOOL WAS WORK WITHOUT ANY FINANCIAL RELIEF NOR JOY.

MY FATHER AND ONE OF MY FORTUNATE FRIENDS HAD PART TIME JOBS WHILE THEY WERE IN HIGH SCHOOL.

THERE WAS A DESPERATE CRAVING FOR MONEY AND CARS. THERE WAS NO OPPORTUNITY TO MEET GIRLS WITHOUT MONEY AND A CAR IN MONTREAL IF YOU LIVED IN THE WORKING CLASS COMMUNITIES. 

A LOT OF MY COMMUNITY DROPPED OUT OF SCHOOL AND GOT A JOB IN THE UNDERCLASS UNFORTUNATELY.

THERE WERE OTHER TEENAGERS WHO WERE GIVEN A LOT OF MONEY COMPARED TO THE NOTHING BUT A FEW NICKELS AND DIMES TO GO SWIMMING OR TO SHARPEN SKATES WHICH IS ALL I EVER GOT AND EVEN THOSE  EXPENSES WERE REGULARLY DENIED. REALLY.

THERE WERE TEENAGERS WHO HAD MONEY EVEN AS CHILDREN, AND TOYS AND PRAISE FOR DOING THEIR SCHOOL WORK. MY MOTHER ADDITIONALLY TO OUR BEING WORKING CLASS INSTITUTED A RIGID CONTROL OF AND DIMINISHMENT OF WHAT LITTLE I HAD. 

MY MOTHER SAID THAT THE WORSE I HAD IT THE BETTER IT WOULD BE FOR ME AND I SUFFERED BADLY. 

EVEN WHEN I WAS TO BE FREED FROM THE WORKING CLASS AND THE UNDERCLASS BY RECEIVING MONEY FROM MY HARD WORKING RELATIVES MY MOTHER SWOOPED IN AND SCOOPED IT UP FOR HERSELF.

MY EX WIFE WAS UNPREPARED FOR WORK. SHE HAD MONEY AND LEISURE AS A TEENAGER AND WOULD NOT DO HOUSE WORK WHEN A VESTIGE OF THE WORK THAT THE WORKING CLASS ORIGINS INFLICTS UPON WOMEN AFFLICTED HER.

BETTY OR TRIXIE?, MY EX-WIFE, HAD GOTTEN MARRIED TO HAVE CHILDREN AND THUS THE POWER OF DIVORCE BUT SHE WAS UNPREPARED TO HAVE TO DO THE TWENTY YEARS OF HOUSEWORK THAT WERE REQUIRED TO EARN A HUGE HUSBAND CRUSHING DIVORCE PAYMENT.

SO TRIXIE FOUND TYLER LUCCIES WHO TAUGHT HER HOW TO "USE THE POLICE" TO MAKE SURE THAT I WOULD NEVER LEAVE THE WORKING CLASS. AS I WORKED MY BODY HARDER THAN I SHOULD HAVE FROM POVERTY TO PARALYSIS I WAS CREATED AS A DEFAMED MEMBER OF THE UNDERCLASS BY LAWYERS AND POLICE THAT FELL FOR HER INSANE LIES. 

 

CHICKEN POLICE AT LAVERDE TEXAS HID IN THE HALL WHILE PSYCHO-TEEN KILLED NINETEEN YOUNG CHILDREN WHO WERE CALLING 911 OVER AND OVER. PSYCHO TEEN TERRORIZED THE CHILDREN,SAYING THINGS LIKE "TIME TO DIE."

 

CLICK ON THE BANNER.

DEFUND THE CHICKEN POLICE

LIEN ON ME

I VIEWED A DOCUMENTARY ON LIENS. 

IT, COMBINED WITH TOTAL RECALL, HAS LED ME TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF MY OWN EXPERIENCE WITH LIENS WHICH I HAVE NOT EVER SIGNED ANY THEREOF. 

Postscript: I remembered, the liens were Alpine Heating and Simpson Sears. They would be no money down deals to save money on heating with the Furnace and to get a Hot Water Tank. The financing of the attached to the home appliances qualified the sellers to impose the liens. It was and is today, a scam.

I OWNED A HOUSE IN VICTORIA BC IN A PARTNERSHIP WITH MY 1991 TO 1993 GIRLFRIEND. SHE COLLECTED RENT ON IT AND FAILED TO PAY THE MORTGAGE.

I KNOW THAT THIS WAS A LONG TIME AGO BUT I WAS STILL BROKE FIVE YEARS LATER FROM THE LIENS AND THE MORTGAGE PAYOUT. INHERITED MONEY JUST SLIPPED OUT OF MY GRASP ONCE AGAIN WHEN I WAS SUPPOSED TO GET IT AND BREATHE A SIGH OF RELIEF.

IN A MANNER I HAVE TO CHARACTERIZE AS TYPICAL OF WOMEN IN MY LIFE, MY LOVELY GIRLFRIEND ANN DID NOT TELL ME ABOUT THE LIENS NOR THE UNPAID MORTGAGE NOR THE FORECLOSURE.

THAT IS BAD, THE HOUSE WAS BEING FORECLOSED UPON, I WAS INFORMED ABOUT IT BY MY NOTARY WHO HAD NOTICED THE FORECLOSURE WAS HAPPENING. I RUSHED DOWN TO THE BANK AND GAVE THEM MY ENTIRE INHERITANCE FROM MY AUNT ANNETTE.

THAT MEANS I INHERITED MONEY AND DID NOT GET A CAR OR A TRIP OR EVEN A COFFEE. I DID NOT GET ONE DOLLAR OF MY INHERITANCE OUT OF THE BANK.

THEN I DISCOVERED THAT THERE WERE TWO LIENS ON THE HOUSE. I JUST NOW LEARNED HOW THAT HAPPENED. SHE SIGNED UP FOR TWO MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS ON THINGS IN THE HOUSE WITHOUT TELLING ME. I HAD TO PAY THE LIENS THAT SHE WAS SUCKED IN ON!  

LIEN FRAUDSTERS PUT A LIEN ON YOUR PROPERTY BASED ON ONE DOLLAR OF BENEFIT YOU GOT FROM THEM.

IT IS HARD TO CONTEST THAT YOU DID NOT GET A DOLLAR'S BENEFIT.

MY EX-WIFE TRIXIE DASHEVESKY OR BETTY COLLARD AND HER LAWYER TYLER LUCCIES WERE EVEN GREATER FRAUDSTERS. THEY PLACED A LIEN ON MY PROPERTY SO I COULD NOT SELL NOR BORROW ON IT FOR ZERO DOLLARS OF UNPAID CHILD SUPPORT. YES, $0.00.

ABSOLUTION IS GRANTED AND EVEN DEMANDED WITHOUT A THOUGHTFUL ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY. THIS IS AN ABSURD CODDLING OF HEINOUS CRIMINALS BY FORGIVING THEM. THIS SHOULD NEVER BE DONE.

STUPIDLY REFUSING TO CONDEMN VERY BAD BEHAVIOR LETS OFFENDERS AVOID RESPONSIBILITY AND IT SUPPORTS THEM WHICH DENIES REMEDY TO VICTIMS AND IT DELEGITIMIZES VICTIM OUTRAGE AND EXPOSES THE VICTIM TO A BACKLASH.

THE MOTHER OF THE 18 YEAR OLD UVALDE TEXAS MASS MURDERER SAID:

"HE HAD HIS REASONS FOR DOING WHAT HE DID. PLEASE DON'T JUDGE HIM."

THAT IS ACTUALLY REALLY CRAZY.

THE TEENAGED MURDERER TAUNTED HIS VICTIMS YOU ENABLING MOTHER.

"TIME TO DIE" HE SAID, "GOODNIGHT".*

WITHIN MY FAMILY AND IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT I SEE THE SAME ALLEGEDLY "WOKE" AND PERMISSIVE FAILURE TO ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY FOR BAD ACTS.

                                                                                 

IT DOES NOT MATTER WHAT REASONS A PERSON        MIGHT HAVE FOR COMMITTING DAMAGING ACTS.   * UNLESS THEY ARE PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM A REAL AND IMMINENT DANGER THERE IS NO EXCUSE THAT LAWFULLY PERMITS THE USE OF THEFT OR VIOLENCE. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR DEFAMATION.

THE SAME ATTITUDE WHICH THE MOTHER OF THE MURDERER DEMONSTRATES WAS APPLIED TO MY WIFE'S REFUSAL TO PERFORM AS A WIFE AND HER ABSURD DESTRUCTION OF MY FINANCES. ONE ABSURD APOLOGIST SAID " SHE GETS TO DO WHAT SHE WANTS TO". ACTUALLY I OWNED EVERYTHING SO I SHOULD GET TO DO WHAT I WANTED TO DO NOT HER.

MY EX-WIFE CREATED NO BENEFITS. SHE PRACTICED A WILLFUL DENIAL OF MY WISHES POWERED BY THREATS OF A  DIVORCE WHICH WOULD PUT ALL OF MY FAMILY ON THE STREET. 

WATCHING SOME HLN DURING THE   * DEPP-HEARD TRIAL. IF IT WASN'T FOR DIVORCE MONEY AND SLAVERY OF ME TO HER, I WONDER IF I WOULD HAVE ARRIVED HOME TO A SHOTGUN BLAST? 

*MY EX WIFE SAID* "I HAVE DECIDED, I AM GOING TO MAKE LIFE AS HARD AS POSSIBLE FOR YOU"

SUPERCREEP RCMP HAL ZIEKE WAS TRYING TO FRAUDULENTLY INCARCERATE ME. HE MOCKED ME: "YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A NICE REST."

IS YOUR INTELLECT SUFFICIENT TO SEE THE PARALLELS BETWEEN THE STATEMENTS OF THE LAVERDE MURDERER AND THOSE OF MY WIFE AND THE ROGUE POLICE OFFICER ZEIKE?   

POLITIC ROCKER WAS KILLED BY THE CONCERTED ACTIONS OF UNDERCLASS BOORS

TO BE EFFECTIVE AS POLITIC ROCKER, FINANCIAL SUPPORT HAD TO BE AVAILABLE OR POSSIBLE TO EARN WITHOUT BEING ON THE JOB ALL THE TIME. MY JOB AT THE CNR AS I LEFT IT BUT NOT BY CHOICE, BUT BY FRAUD, WAS SUPPORTING POLITIC ROCKER AND STILL LEAVING TIME TO PURSUE OTHER ARTISTIC, MUSICAL AND POLITICAL ACTIVITIES.

THE FIRST THING WHICH WAS WHISKED AWAY WAS MY CNR JOB.

THE NEXT THING UNLAWFULLY SEIZED FROM ME WAS BURRVILLA. POLITIC ROCKER WAS MORTALLY WOUNDED BY THE SEIZURE. POLITIC ROCKER DID NOT DO HIS THING AGAIN FROM 1978 TIL 1990. 

POLITIC ROCKER SHOULD HAVE BEEN RESURRECTED BUT EVERY THING I HAD TAKEN WITH ME FROM BURRVILLA WAS STOLEN BEFORE THE ARSON OR BURNT UP IN THE FIRE, JUNE 20 1980, AT THE FIRST HOUSE WHICH I BOUGHT PARTLY FINISHED AND HAD FINISHED .

I HAD BEEN FORCED TO STORE MY  CHATTELS AND EQUIPMENT THERE AS BURRVILLA HAD BEEN SEIZED AND THE FACTORY SOLD, SO WHEN THE REDNECKS BURNT ME OUT THEY BURNT ME RIGHT OUT.

MY INHERITED MONEY WOULD EASILY HAVE SUPPORTED MY CAREER AS POLITIC ROCKER UNTIL IT COULD SUPPORT ITSELF AND MYSELF.

MEANWHILE BACK AT THE RANCH AND 

MOTHER TOOK A PILE MUCH SMALLER IN 1964 BUT I COULD HAVE BOUGHT A SMALL HOTEL THAT WAS FOR SALE IN FREDERICTON NB WHEN I WAS AT UNB. 

I DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE BUT THE HOTEL MIGHT HAVE BEEN WAY DOWN THIS STREET

The building had been the RCAF Officer`s club. I wonder if the Flag indicates that. I had never seen this until just now as I googled modern Fredericton hotels instead of searching for archival records from 1965.

THE BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES AND IN THE MAIL AND IN WILLS THE WOMEN RAPACIOUSLY TOOK ALL OF THE MONEY IN LINDON COLLARD ACCOUNTS, TRUSTS, WILLS AND THEY EVEN EMPTIED HIS RAGGED POCKETS OF ANYTHING HE EARNED.

MY MONEY WAS TAKEN!

LOOK AT THOSE PILES OF MONEY.

WHAT AN EXAGGERATION! NO NO NO!

EACH OF THOSE PILES OF MONEY IS ABOUT$300,000. BETTY'S HOUSE TAKEOVER COST THAT MUCH. TRIXIE'S BUSINESS FAILURE COST THAT MUCH. BETTY OR TRIXIE DIVORCE, THAT MUCH AGAIN. FRANCINE HATE 7 PILES.

MY MONEY WAS TAKEN.

AND ALSO MY UNCLE'S HOUSE WHICH HE HAD WILLED TO ME. FRANCINE HATED THE COLLARDS SO SHE MANIPULATED THE  CONVERSION OF MY WILL FROM UNCLE ALBERT FROM BENEFITING ME TO BENEFITING OTHER RELATIVES. IT WAS HER IDEA BUT MOTHER AND ANDREW AND JOANNE LOVED IT.

THEY SUCKED EVERY DROP OF GAS OUT OF POLITIC ROCKER'S ENTERPRISE.

HOW FAMILY WOMEN'S DITZKRIEG LEFT ME PENNILESS AND DEFENSELESS AS MY EX-WIFE STARTED TO INFORM FALSELY TO LAWYERS AND POLICE ABOUT ME AND THEN TAKE A SERIES OF BASELESS FRAUDULENT LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST ME AND SO DID THE POLICE

 

BURNING A MAN AT BOTH ENDS

May 24, 2022   DITZKRIEG IS A LINDON COLLARD blog. Click the date to enter my controversial blog.

THROUGHOUT MY CHILDHOOD MY MOTHER BEAT ME VICIOUSLY DAILY.  

MY MOTHER REFUSED TO ALLOW ME TO RECEIVE GIFTS EXCEPT FOR ONLY MONEY AND THEN MY MOTHER STOLE ALL THE MONEY MY RELATIVES GAVE TO ME. 

I WAS EXTREMELY HAPPY AT 16 TO LEAVE HOME TO ATTEND UNIVERSITY WITH A BANK ACCOUNT AND A TRUST FUND COMING MY WAY AT 18.

THAT DID NOT HAPPEN. MY MOTHER SAID SHE WAS "IN AUTHORITY" AND SHE TOOK MY MONEY FROM MY BANK AT 16 AND SEIZED MY TRUST FUND FROM MY PATERNAL GRANDFATHER AT 18. 

I HAD HEARD AD NAUSEAM HOW I DID NOT DESERVE THE FARMERS AND MERCHANTS TRUST FUND WILLED ME SO I "WOULD NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH" THE POVERTY  THAT MY PATERNAL GRANDFATHER HAD EXPERIENCED  AND RIGHT WHEN I WAS TO RECEIVE THE MONEY IT WAS TAKEN AWAY.

SOMEHOW. MY MOTHER HAD MY MAIL. IS THAT ALL IT TOOK, JUST STEAL MY  MAIL, AND THUS, STEAL MY MONEY.

THE THEFT OF MY MAIL, ADDRESSED TO ME, BY FAMILY WOMEN CONTINUED. 

NEXT, THUS, FAMILY WOMEN STOLE MY CONTINUING INHERITANCES. 

THEY ALSO EXTORTED ME FORCING ME AGAINST MY WILL, TO SPEND WHAT I HAD EARNED WHEN I COULD NOT AFFORD ANYTHING, NOT EVEN SHOES. 

BY 1990 THERE WAS NOTHING LEFT.  

BY 1990 I WAS DRESSED IN RAGS, DRIVING A $500 CAR AND I WAS ABSOLUTELY PENNILESS FROM MAKING PAYMENTS OF UP TO $3600 PER MONTH FOR SIX YEARS.

Then my ex-wife started to take legal action against me with myself impoverished and  unable to take proper legal action in response.

My ex-wife had been secretly undercutting me in collusion with my Mother, my Brother, my Sister and my Sister in Law, stealing my inheritances.

My ex-wife had been colluding with the Redneck Neighbors who had deliberately ruined my land. The group's women had also been defaming me.

My ex-wife had exulted as she demanded that I sign over all my assets to her. She had borrowed and spent and lost all of my equity and she had mortgaged the home she did not own and I would have that money taken from my Father's estate from my part and the money was given to my Brother and Sister.

EVEN THOUGH BETTY OR TRIXIE HAD HOLLOWED OUT MY PROPERTY TO NOTHING SHE THOUGHT AND HER LAWYER TYLER LUCCIES WROTE:

LUCCIES ON HIS LETTERHEAD IN A LEGAL LETTER WROTE THAT I SHOULD SIGN MY PROPERTY OVER TO HIS CLIENT IN LIEU OF PROVIDING CHILD SUPPORT.

HE WENT ON: THE DEBT ON THE PROPERTY WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REPAID SHOULD BE MY DEBT AND MY SOLE RESPONSIBILITY.

I tried to sensibly satisfy my ex-wife's greed, provide a home for the children to live in, and add to total family assets. The ex-wife was entitled to nothing. I was trying to protect the children from her financial irresponsibility.

My ex-wife refused the offer. "I am not going to so what you guys want me to" she wanted only trouble and impoverishment for me. I am going to make life as difficult as possible for you, she said, I want you on the street or in Jail. 

She wanted CA$H, under the table and so did Mother. These Women are Indictably Criminal Extortionists who also sought to unlawfully imprison me. All I did was build my Family  homes and that was used to impoverish me. 

I ASSURE YOU THAT I CONTINUED FOR ANOTHER TEN YEARS 1990 TO 2000 WITHOUT EVER HAVING A DOLLAR OF DISPOSABLE INCOME. 

I HAD PAID $3600 A MONTH AND WORKED FOR NO MONEY FOR MYSELF, EVER, FOR SIX YEARS BEFORE THE ACTUAL DIVORCE EVENTS WITH TYLER LUCCIES STARTED IN 1990 TO BE CLEAR. 

postscript: By chance this document or letter came up as I searched. Supposedly we can, all of us, seek to rectify matters in Court.   Here is the post I found:

 All great in theory, but a court order is useless if the courts won’t enforce it. A family member has a crazy ex wife who blames him for everything & has cost him over $50,000.00 in legal fees, just so he can have access to his kids & to take her to court for the multitude of contempt of the court order charges against her. She gets a slap on the hand, he gets a mega legal bill, & she turns around & just does it over again. She has also made false allegations about him to Children’s Services & the police, which he’s also had to pay a lawyer to defend him & she just carries on with no repercussions. She is a nutcase, but, no one seems to care & he has to constantly be on guard

I was sure that if I countered my ex-wife's legal actions which were declared to be designed to impoverish me, I had no money, I probably could not have borrowed any money and if I did the result could be disastrous and what else would my ex-wife do? 

THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE METADATA

THE POSTING OF WRITING, VIDEO, AND MUSICAL PERFORMANCE COUPLED WITH THE CREATION AND RETENTION OF TAPES AND VIDEO OF COMPOSITIONS CREATES A BODY OF LEGAL EVIDENCE WHERE ONLY THE METADATA IS PERTINENT AND SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE.

IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU LIKE OR DO NOT LIKE MY WORK OR IF YOU ARE CERTAIN THAT I WOULD NOT SUCCEED.

ANY EVALUATION WHICH WOULD BE BROUGHT FORWARD TO ATTEMPT TO DENY THAT I WOULD SUCCEED WOULD BE LEGALLY WORTHLESS SPECULATION.

WHAT MATTERS IS THAT THE METADATA AND THE RECORD OF THE WORK THAT WAS DONE AND THE PERFORMANCES  I EXHIBITED IN A RATIONAL PROJECT TO ACHIEVE POPULARITY EXISTS.

I WAS WATCHING A HISTORICAL FILM ABOUT MUSICIANS. THE VERY INTERESTING INFORMATION FOR MYSELF, WAS THAT THE VALUE OF MUSICIANS WAS BASED ON THEIR PERFORMANCE SKILLS AND HOW MANY SONGS THE HAD IN THEIR SONG BOOKS.

I HAVE ALWAYS HAD MORE SONGS WRITTEN THAN ANY MUSICIAN I EVER ENCOUNTERED AND I STILL SO.

I HAD THE INTENT TO SUCCEED. I AM SURE THAT I WAS ON THE RIGHT TRACK TO BE SUCCESSFUL. I BELIEVE THAT THE STEALING OF MY INHERITANCES, THE ARSON AND THEFT OF EVERYTHING I HAD OR WAS AND THE DEFAMING OF MYSELF WITHOUT ANY RATIONAL REASON PREVENTED ANY SUCCESS.