AFLAC - 360PEO Inc.

Lindon Collard

rotosne6u1au3l70m8c2hl4m  · 

Shared with Public

I WAS INJURED IN 1968 AND 1970 WITH MY "OUT OF WORK " INSURANCE PAID RIGHT UP. A HFAS INSURANCE COMPANY LAWYER AND A HFAS CNR EMPLOYEE RELATIONS CLERK BROUGHT THE DUCK IN OVERHEAD AND IT JUST SHIT ON ME NO DISABILITY PAYMENTS. THE TWO QUEERS THREW MY FILE IN THE GARBAGE ONE OF THEM BOASTED.

AFLAC

I just found out that my "Denied"by destroying my file!!! Aflac Disability insurance should have lasted all my life from the accident in 1970

I MANAGED TO DEAL WITH DISABLEMENT IN 1968, BY WORKING THREE WEEKS  AND ONE WEEK OFF UNTIL I.WAS INJURED AND DOMINATED AGAIN IN 1970.

Monday, May 9, 2022

THE FAILURE TO COMPENSATE AN ACCIDENT VICTIM ACTUALLY ENCOURAGED PEOPLE TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST, DEFAME AND CRIMINALIZE A PERSON WHO WAS JOLTED OUT OF THEIR LIFE AND REALITY BY A HUGE CRASH!

Aflac - One of our goals for 2021 is to continually grow...AFLAC Insurance | AFSCME Council 28 (WFSE)

wfse.org

Aflac - One of our goals for 2021 is to continually grow..

 

THE FAILURE TO TO COMPENSATE ME FOR THE LOSS OF MY JOB AND MY PHYSICAL MOBILITY COST ME MORE THAN JUST THE MONTHLY PAYMENTS FROM  "AFLAC" AND THE AWARD FOR DAMAGES FROM THE BRITISH COLUMBIA COURTS. 

IT COST ME MY SOCIAL LIFE AND IT COST ME MY REPUTATION AND THE FALSEHOOD AND DEFAMATION OF MYSELF HAS MADE ME VULNERABLE TO A PLETHORA OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL THEFT, ABUSE AND FALSE ACCUSATION FROM PEOPLE WHO I  HAD NOT MET, BUT WHO LOOKED ME UP. 

AND GLORY BE, LINDON COLLARD ACCUSED OF BEING A BANK ROBBER DESPITE ATTENDING AT SCHOOL OR WORK EVERY WORKING DAY FROM 17 TO 21 YEARS OLD WHEN THIS FIRST DEFAMATION WAS LAUNCHED. 

THEY WERE REALLY DUMB RUBES AND REALLY DRUNK IN THE LATE SIXTIES AND EARLY SEVENTIES, THE LAWYERS ESPECIALLY SO. IS THIS HAPPENING NOW OR  AGAIN OR IS IT STILL  HAPPENING?

I HAVE JUST BECOME AWARE THAT THE DISABILITY PAYMENTS FROM AFFLAC WHICH I PAID FOR WITH EVERY PAY CHECK  SHOULD HAVE GONE ON FROM AGE TWENTY FOUR TO AGE  SIXTY FIVE. THAT MUST BE ABLE TO BE SUED OVER BECAUSE THERE ARE NO TIME LIMITS PROTECTING FRAUD THROUGH THE PASSAGE OF TIME IN CANADA.

MADNESS. May 06, 2022 My increasingly diminishing belief in the moral integrity of Women:

 

DITZKRIEG DAMAGES EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING. IT IS A WAR LIKE PUTIN'S WAR. A WAR WITHOUT REASON DRIVEN BY MADNESS.

May 06, 2022         Click on the date to enter the DITZKRIEG blog

  

Postscript: I have had agreements which were made with myself by men which were not adhered to. There has been obfuscation and misrepresentation which induced me to enter into agreements or make purchases or to not make purchases differently than if I had honestly been informed.

There might be a case to be made  where men and women were equally deceitful.

The "family" and relationship agreements I had with Women were not truthful, informative nor were they reasonably adhered to nor were the intentions of owners and gift givers respected. The "Family" and "Relationship" agreements and representations have turned out to be the most important in several ways.

My Mother was entrusted with my care as a small child and she beat the hell out of me and stole any money that was given to me by Aunt, Uncle or Grandfather. The last amount was substantial in 1964. By the 1980's Family were stealing Two Million Dollars led by my Mother whose Brother, my Uncle, may have entrusted her with delivering my will from him to me. The other possibility is that the will was mailed to me and my Ex-Wife stole it and gave it to My Mother.

My ex-wife agreed to raise any children we had, as a family, until they were twenty years old before I would agree to have children with her and put all of my assets into a Family Home and Chattels.

Trixie Dashevsky or Betty Dash agreed as Betty Dash to the terms of a standard government Marriage Contract in November 1978 when we got married. She thought that it was a one way obligation which fell only upon me and egregiously and  prejudicially interpreted by her.

My ex-wife demanded control of every little thing and she imposed her "Feelings" orientated overall plan which spent everything I had and forced me to borrow, as ordered from My Mother, and that allowed my "Collard Family Womans' and Pooches' Gang" to mine my inheritances, some to complete exhaustion. I was resigned to having to finance my Ex-Wife's business, as I could not afford the divorce and disinheritance which I was threatened with.

THEN ANDREW CAME TO CHOCOLATE & VANILLA LAUGHING AND SMIRKING AND SAID "MOTHER HAS DECIDED TO CHARGE YOU INTEREST AT THE RATE OF HER HIGHEST PAYING INVESTMENT SHE HAS". IT WAS MY FATHER'S INVESTED INCOME.

I SAID I ONLY AGREED TO PAY BACK THE WIFE'S DEBT SO AS NOT TO BE DISINHERITED AND DIVORCED, NOT INTEREST.

I PAID 1% OF THE DEBT BACK EACH MONTH FOR 100 PAYMENTS AND WHEN I INHERITED MY FATHER'S MONEY ANDREW AND MOTHER, AND WHO KNOWS WHO HELPED, THEN COLLECTED THE ENTIRE DEBT FROM ME AGAIN AND CHARGED MORE INTEREST.THEY TOOK FROM ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS TO ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS MORE FOR INTEREST OR PRINCIPAL THEY CLAIMED WAS NOT YET PAID OFF. HIGHWAY ROBBERY!

I DID NOT AGREE TO DO ANY OF WHAT I HAD NOT ORIGINALLY AGREED TO DO WHEN WHATEVER DEAL WAS MADE NOR TO EVER GIVE UP ANY INHERITED MONEY OR PROPERTY OR EARNED PROPERTY TO ANYONE, NOT EVER. I WAS DECEIVED, OBFUSCATED OR FORCED TO DO WHAT I DID NOT WANT TO DO OR I NEVER KNEW WHAT WAS GOING ON, THERE WAS A LOT OF SECRET THEFT THAT WENT ON. 

IF I WAS ILLEGITIMATELY FORCED TO MAKE A "COLOR OF LAW" DRIVEN PAYMENT, EVEN WHEN IT WAS ALLEGEDLY "LEGAL" BECAUSE LAWYERS WERE INVOLVED, THAT HAD TO INVOLVE THE BREAKING OF AGREEMENTS OR THE DENIAL OF THE INTENT AND WISHES OF PERSONS WHO GAVE ME ASSETS. WHEN THE WILL ALTERATION AND/OR PRESSURING OF VERY OLD PEOPLE TO CHANGE THEIR WILLS, WAS DONE, THAT WAS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE COMMITTED AGAINST ME.

THE NON FINANCIAL FAILURES OF WOMEN INVOLVE THEIR AGREEMENTS AS PART OF A MARRIAGE CONTRACT OR PART OF A RE-HIRING AGREEMENT WITH MY LONG TIME FEMALE EMPLOYEE . I CERTAINLY DID NOT AGREE THAT MY EX-WIFE WOULD BE PERMITTED TO WORK AGAINST ME AS I ATTEMPTED TO REMEDY WATER ACT VIOLATION, SOIL REMOVAL, AND OTHER DAMAGING OF OUR HOME PROPERTY HERE AT OTTER POINT.

MY MOTHER, I FORGOT, ALSO STOLE NON FINANCIAL MAIL.

MY EMPLOYEE WAS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO TESTIFY TRUTHFULLY AS TO WHAT HAD TRANSPIRED WHILE SHE WAS WORKING AND WHEN ANY PERSONS MADE ALLEGATIONS ABOUT ME. I HAD BEEN CONCERNED WITH BOTH OF THESE ISSUES FOR A VERY LONG TIME. I WAS INSISTENT AND SPECIFIC.

MY EX-WIFE STILL HAS MY DOCUMENTS AND PICTURES OF THE WATER ACT CASE I AM STILL PURSUING THIRTY NINE YEARS LATER AND MY EMPLOYEE WHO WAS IN A DISPUTE THAT TRIGGERED ALLEGATIONS ABOUT ME, STILL HAS DOCUMENTS THAT DEFAME ME THAT SHE IS HOARDING.

NEEDLESS TO SAY THE BEHAVIOR OF THESE WOMEN AND THE ETHICAL AND MORAL DEFICIENCY AND FAILURE TO KEEP AGREEMENTS WHICH WOMEN I HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH HAVE DEMONSTRATED HAS COMPLETELY DESTROYED MY FAITH IN THE CREDIBILITY OF OR BEING ABLE TO TRUST WOMEN.

THEN THERE ARE THE FAKE 911 CALLER WOMEN. 

 

Lindon Collard <lindoncollard@gmail.com>

The preponderance of the evidence is mounting about 

Women's lack of truthfulness.

I have got to the point where socially, I would not be able to trust 

women as a group or individually.

I have also begun to ask myself if I should believe the Female 

Journalists and Presenters on TV.

Men lie too. That has not been my issue except in the case of 

damage to my property where men have lied about what they 

did, what I did and what the Law was and is, and what Facts 

were true.

Most of the Lies told about myself, and Thefts from my 

Inheritances or Earnings and the continual and absurd 

Defamations of myself were the deliberate and calculated 

and fully intent driven actions and projects of women. 

They created a Hysterical Personality Disorder driven False 

Reality and then they stuck together and had the Police 

stick together with them not ever assigning blame to 

another woman. 

I declared the extortion I was subjected to to the CRA twice. 

What was wrong with them?

 

( MY EX WIFE "TOOK ME DOWN, " IN 1984 I HAD TO "START A 

MAJOR BUSINESS FOR HER, WITH HER AS THE OPERATOR".

SHE SPENT ALL OF MY ASSETS, BORROWED MORE SO I LOST 

INHERITANCES, EVERYTHING WAS STRIPPED AWAY FOR THE

WOMEN'S CRIMINAL GANG, WHICH INCLUDED MY BROTHER, 

FRANCINE'S "POOCH" WHO ACTED JUST LIKE THE WOMEN.  

I WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE CHILD SUPPORT LATER. 

MY EX WIFE TOOK OVER AS THE BREADWINNER RIGHT THEN. 

I DID NOT EVER ACHIEVE ANY FINANCIAL PROGRESS, I WAS FLAT 

BROKE FROM 1980 TIL 2001 WHEN AN INHERITANCE FINALLY 

SLIPPED THROUGH THE "WALL OF WOMEN" WITHOUT BEING 

HARVESTED BY THAT CRIMINAL WOMEN'S GANG.)

I declared false 911 and Police Detachment alarms about me to 

be fake to the Chief Crown Prosecutor in person. 

What was wrong with the Crown Prosecution Service?

There are numerous men who ascribe to the "She is never Wrong" 

doctrine and Police do this as silly buggers as well as through 

intellectual and moral deficiency.

The Canard that women are always in danger from men should 

collapse like I do in my case. 

No one has ever looked into anyone's actions or declarations to 

Police when I have complained to the Crown nor when  I published 

the facts about their wrongdoing and notified my MLA. 

No one has investigated at all, not to assign responsibility nor to

charge and prosecute the criminal acts. 

My attempts to obtain  civil damages to remedy the losses and 

damage done are blocked by Law Officer's Ironclad control of 

the Courts. 

Women made up most of the lies about me but Tal Dekel uttered 

heinous falsehood about me in the BC Supreme Court as he fought 

with my ex-girlfriend Anne over an adulterous child, Anne's child.

Did his Gangster Spawn Wife Nikki make it up to go along with 

my Gangster Wife's undetailed, unevidenced lie that I 

"abused her and the children."  

They are sickening repulsive Devils.

Women of Integrity have lost the Default Integrity accorded to 

everyone, by condoning and protecting and failing to recognize 

the wrongdoing of the really Crazy ''Hysterical Personality Disorder "  

driven Women, acting out against not only men, but the projects 

and work of men which they were not damaged by nor in any 

danger from in any way.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said "Fuck" in the House of Commons

THIS MEANS THAT IT IS THE RULE OF  HANSARD THAT: AS THE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT SPEAK AND BEHAVE, THAT  IS THE STANDARD WHICH ANY CANADIAN CITIZEN MAY USE TO GUIDE HIS SPEECH AND DEPORTMENT ANYWHERE.

JOHN SAID FUCK YOU OR FUCK OFF ON FLOOR OF THE HOUSE OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA LEGISLATIVE PARLIAMENT.

THIS HAS TO BE WHAT IT HAS TO BE. I DO NOT KNOW OF ANY WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENTARY PROCESS WHICH WOULD UNRING THE FUCK BELL.

FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING DINGDONGS! 

MEN TOO@blogspot is a LINDON COLLARD blog.THE RECOGNITION OF EQUALITY BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN OVERLOOKED THE EXPERIENCE AND TECHNICAL AND EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS WHICH WERE HELD BY MEN. MEN HAD WORKED HARD TO GET THESE SKILLS.

 

MEN TOO

Men are documented as committing nearly all Violent Criminal Offences. I am disabled and not one of those Men. The statistical opinion ignores the Sociology of Crime which would include motivating and getting groups of people together, making a Fake 911 Call or false report to Authorities to intimidate a victim or creating deliberate economic or social damage for the victim. These are secondary and proxy criminal offences and terrorize citizens or in my case, cause Tonic Immobility Collapse.

May 04, 2022

THE WOMEN WHO MARRIED THE HARD WORKING AND SUCCESSFUL, UNTIL THEN MEN IN THE COLLARD FAMILY HAD NOT EVEN GRADUATED FROM A REAL HIGH SCHOOL COURSE BUT THEY TOOK OVER.

MY MOTHER, GRADE SIX EDUCATED, LED THE PACK. MY MOTHER  STOLE  EVERY INHERITANCE I WOULD HAVE HAD AND WOULD NOT LET THE MONEY HELD BY MY FATHER AND HER, THUS, BE USED IN ANY BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY THAT WOULD HAVE ENRICHED COLLARD FAMILY INDIVIDUALS OR THE ENTIRE COLLARD FAMILY. MY MOTHER HAD NO KNOWLEDGE AND NEITHER DID MY WIFE WHO TOOK OVER AND LOST MY ASSETS.

THE WHOLE COLLARD "FAMILY WAS IN AGREEMENT" SAID MY EX-WIFE. I WAS TO PUT EVERYTHING I OWNED INTO HER FIRST *NOT SUBSIDIZED FOR NINCOMPOOPS BY GOVERNMENT* JOB.

IT WAS TO BE A "MAJOR BUSINESS WITH HER AS THE OPERATOR" OR I WOULD BE DIVORCED AND DISINHERITED. I DID HER BIDDING BUT I WAS DIVORCED AND DISINHERITED CONSTANTLY TOO BY ALL OF THE CRAZY WOMEN.

REGARDING THE MONEY BEING LENT TO MY EX-WIFE WITH ME BEING REQUIRED TO PAY IT BACK FOR HER AND PAY 13 3/4% INTEREST TO MY MOTHER. IT WAS ISABEL COLLARD'S DREAM TO HAVE ME MAKING  PAYMENTS TO HER, TO HER, IT WAS MOTHER EARNING. 

I HAD STUDIED AND BEEN ON COURSES AND I HAD BEEN IN BUSINESS BY MYSELF. 

I HAD PLAYED AT LEAST ONE MUSICAL INSTRUMENT VERY WELL. I OPERATED A COMPLICATED ART AND ARTISAN'S SHOP FACTORY WHERE I SERVED ANY JEWELER WHO CONTACTED ME WITH SILVER AND 23 COLORS AND KARATS IN GOLD CASTINGS.

I PERSONALLY MADE VERY UNIQUE SILVER AND GOLD ARTIFACTS. 

I HAD A  CREW OF CONTRACT POLISHERS.

WE COULD MAKE YOU ZILLIONS OF ANYTHING *YOU* COULD IMAGINE.

HOW OFTEN IS THE MISTAKE MADE: THAT SHELLSHOCK IS JUST A SPINAL INJURY?

 DISABLED NOT COMPENSATED@blogspot.

SHELL SHOCK :

Shell Shock® Fitness TV

Wednesday, May 4, 2022

THERE IS A DISABILITY, SWAYBACK, WHICH IS ASSOCIATED WITH TONIC IMMOBILITY.

SHELLSHOCK MIGHT BE THE OLD VERY DRAMATIC NAME FOR THE SYNDROME.

I WAS BUYING A NEW MATTRESS AT A SEARS DISCOUNT WAREHOUSE IN SAANICH IN 1982 OR THEREABOUTS. 

THE SALESMAN SAID THAT HE HAD A VERY BADLY INJURED BACK AS I HAD SAID I DID. HE RECOUNTED HIS INEXPLICABLE DIFFICULTY WITH TYING UP HIS SHOES AND PUTTING  TROUSERS OR SOCKS  ON AS WELL.

I EXPERIENCED THAT DIFFICULTY. I WAS SURPRISED, OTHER BACK SYMPTOMS WERE ACUTE AT TIMES, BUT THERE WAS OFTEN AN INABILITY TO BEND FORWARD WHILE I WAS INFLEXIBLE AND IN A  REVERSE ARCH SPINAL ARCHITECTURE. THAT CAUSED MY CHEST TO SEIZE AS I  TRIED TO PUT MY SOCKS AND SHOES ON.

DISABLED AS THE SALESMAN AND I BOTH WERE, WE NEITHER OF US, KNEW THAT WHAT WAS HAMPERING US WAS NOT ONLY BACK INJURY BUT IT WAS ALSO:

SHELL SHOCK 

THERE ARE PROBABLY A LOT OF SHELL SHOCK AFFECTED PEOPLE, SOME  SUBTLY, OTHERS REVERSED ARCHED INTO AN INSTITUTIONALIZED WRECK.

PACIFISM FOR ME AND MILITARIZED POLICE FOR THE HYSTERICS.

THERE IS AN ABSURD DEMAND THAT I ACT IN AN ENTIRELY PEACEFUL MANNER WHEN I AM TRESPASSED UPON, WHEN I AM SUBJECTED TO VANDALISM, THEFT OR FALSE CHARACTERIZATION.

WHEN MY SOIL WAS BEING TRUCKED OFF AND MY PRIVACY FOREST WAS BEING CUT DOWN; WHEN THE DITCH WAS BEING DUG, I CAUGHT THEM DOING IT EACH TIME, BUT I WAS ALONE AND THERE WAS NO AUTHORITY THAT WOULD HELP ME.

TWICE OVER A DOZEN PEOPLE INVADED MY PROPERTY. I CALLED THE POLICE BUT NO AUTHORITY WOULD HELP ME. 

THE CRAZY REDNECKS DUG A DEEP HOLE AND FORCED THE DRUNK CONTRACTOR TO BUILD MY HOUSE DOWN IN THE HOLE. I ARRIVED WHEN THE FOUNDATION WAS BEING POURED DOWN THERE. THE CONTRACTOR REFUSED TO STOP. HE WOULD CALL THE POLICE HE SAID, HE HAD A CONTRACT.

I CONTACTED AUTHORITIES AND I WENT TO SEE A LAWYER. I WAS TOLD I WOULD HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR FINISHED UP HIS "CONTRACT". IT WAS MORE POWERFUL THAN MY OWNERSHIP.

RATIONALLY, THERE IS NO WAY I SHOULD SUFFER ANY LOSSES NOR DAMAGE. 

IF THE AUTHORITIES WILL NOT PROTECT MY PROPERTY, I SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROTECT MY PROPERTY. THAT TURNS OUT IN PRACTICE TO BE MADE INTO AN IMPOSSIBLE TASK. 

THE ONLY WAY THIS CAN WORK OUT TO RATIONALLY ALLOW ME TO PROTECT MYSELF UNDER THAT RESTRAINT IS THAT THE CROWN MUST TAKE UP MY REMEDY FOR ME, I AM NOT ALLOWED TO.

WHEN PEOPLE TRESPASS OR INTERFERE IN MY AFFAIRS OR REACH OUT TO THE POLICE TO ENFORCE  THEIR DEMANDS THERE IS NOTHING SACRED ABOUT THEM NOR THEIR AGENTS. 

STILL I AM REQUIRED TO TREAT THEM WITH REVERENCE NOT BETRAYING ANY ANGRY REACTION NOR MAKING ANY INNOCENT AND NORMAL MOTION  WHICH COULD BE HYSTERICALLY INFLATED TO BE CALLED A THREAT. 

I AM NOT TO RAISE MY VOICE WHEN THE INTERLOPERS ARE COMPLETELY WRONG

THERE IS A RECOGNIZABLE HYSTERIA WHICH ACCOMPANIES A MAJORITY OF THE REQUESTS FOR PROTECTION OR WHAT IS MORE LIKE AN OFFENSE WHICH IS DECLARED TO BE A  DEFENSE. 

WHY ARE THESE INTERFERING INTERLOPERS ALLOWED  AT ALL ON MY  PROPERTY? WHY CAN THEY SEND MILITARIZED POLICE TO MY PROPERTY WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE? 

THEY ARE DEFENDING THEIR CRIME WITH  AN ABSURD HYSTERICAL PERSONALITY DEFECT DRIVEN CLAIM THAT THEY ARE IN DANGER, FROM A DANGEROUS MAN AT HOME CRIPPLED WHO COULD NOT BE DANGEROUS TO THEM. JUST STAY HOME WHERE YOU ARE SAFE. DON'T "MING VASE" ME WITH YOUR FRAGILE WORTH.  

ARE THE CROWN AUTHORITIES WHO REFUSE TO PROTECT ME  PLAYING THIS GAME WITH ME TOO? OH YES THEY ARE!