FIRST BLOW UP ROYAL MAIL BOX

THE HONOR OF THE CROWN POSTSCRIPT

                                                        

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA RULED THAT THE HONOR OF THE CROWN REQUIRED ETHICAL ACTION.

For many decades I have stated that when a person is representing the Crown, enforcing law and maintaining order and standards that person has sworn that they would be be truthful, ethical and faithful to the Law and their mandate to aid and protect Canada its citizens and their property. The Supreme Court of Canada ruling involved a duty to uphold the Honor of the Crown in the situation where the right of the plaintiffs was recognized though it was not spelled out in treaty or in an agreement. I have described the situations I have been involved in as requiring complete honesty and dedication to the mandate they operated under. I have stated  " YOU SWORE AN OATH " and this means you must represent Canada as you so swore, you must uphold  THE HONOR OF THE CROWN.

                                

When I was growing up attending English Catholic School the honorable nature of government was not questioned. We felt we could trust our government and its representatives, I was shocked to hear that the Montreal Mayor Drapeau  was said to be corrupt. I could not understand how this would be accomplished.

Federation Liberation de Quebec came along and totally disrespected the Crown and its agencies and any royal association meant obliteration. I think that the FLQ attitude was present in my in-law Francine and in the large number of French Canadians in the local RCMP detachment. I think it was a brainwashed idiocy which led the French Canadians to damage myself and to admittedly hate me. Mindless as blowing up Mail Boxes because Royal was emblazoned on the Mail Box. I remember that someone was killed by a Mail Box blowup. 

  "Canada Exposed FLQ Channel" YouTube Search has animations of what was factually stated as Federation Liberation de Quebec policy and goals of the Seperatists and the bone chilling pogrom and ethnic cleansing proposed by George Shorters.    I TEST GOOGLED THE CHANNEL, FAR DOWN THE PAGE LOOK FOR THE PAPER MACHE' HEAD OF MICHELLE JEAN LAFOND. She has a blue headdress and an FLQ sign. ON THE SIDEBAR WAS VIDEO OF  REAL TV WITH A POLICY STATEMENT IN ENGLISH AND SPEECHES BY FLQ LEADERS AND FOUNDERS.  

                                                                              

                                                   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vH5bMtFTCbE

                                                                         

                          

                                                                                                  

                                                                                                 

                                             

MOB MOB MOB & MOMOB

USA  POLITICIAN SAID " THIS IS MOB RULE '' AND THOUGH I DID NOT AGREE I DID SEE. 

  Democracy has been lost in many ways into a manipulated crowd response and into crowd bullying of smaller groups and individuals. There is a lot of public input that is simply a negativist overpowering of individual will.  There is a stamp of legitimacy placed upon those who win elections that  overrules the will of individuals and groups for no real reason that I would accredit.  The protection against a myriad of public nuisances and dangers is real and necessary . Protection to assuage fears or opinions or prejudices is catering to Mob Rule. 

I object to the acquiescence to the will of Police and By-Law and Sheriffs which is widely practiced and IS DEMANDED FROM PERSONS WHO DO NOT ASCRIBE TO ACQUIESCENCE  as they are competent to administer their affairs and property and will not damage anyone or their property particularly when the property is large, rural and screened by vegetation. Businesses are highly regulated as well and have insurance and mortgage company oversight and the businesses and their owners should not be subject to any unnecessary acquiescence to authorities caused by telephone callers who remain anonymous but who create a state of conflict with authorities.

If the activity on a property damages the surroundings or environment in a real manner then of course regulation is necessary.

 When a person makes a disposition of property or capital if that property or capital is seized or diverted from the use the owner intended, as I recently wrote: ``by force or in my (ones) absence or under color of law`` and I would add by fraud or coercion or the creation of fear or declaring unworthyness or through defamation, this should not occur. Authorities should not refuse to act  nor should they blindly protect the offending persons.  PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND PROPERTY USE SHOULD BE PROTECTED, FREEDOM OF ACTION AND DISPOSITION SHOULD  NOT BE SUBJECT TO  MOB RULE. 

If the activity of an individual does damage to persons or property the actions taken by authorities are legitimate. If the activity of a person or group is disliked or characterized negatively that is no reason for authorities to act or raid or publish defamation against a person or group. The most egregious false motivation of authorities is through predictive negativity and declarations about what a person or group thinks or feels. As I wrote previously: Nuts Nuts it is all so Nuts.

IF A NUMBER OF NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES OR LAW OFFICERS ACT WITHOUT LAWFUL PURPOSE AGAINST A PERSON OR GROUP THEY ARE A MOB OF BULLIES THIEVES AND TERRORISTS. A MOB.

The lyrics of this video ``Vote`` are more about what is not democratic in our Society than a plea to vote.

                                                                                           

CONTEMPORANEOUS

I have written about the "timing thing ", it is never the right time. When contemporaneous or upon discovery complaint or submission of evidence or invitation to view evidence proffers are not responded to there should be no way for it to be " too late ", not ever. When I raise the subject, damage to myself, my property and my prospects whether it was by force or in my absence or under color of law, there is no receptive audience  nor is there assistance from authorities and there is often an openly declared refusal to act or threat to act against me instead of the persons who did the damage.

Perhaps it is me myself, considered worthless, who cares what I think happened.

I wrote to authorities and submitted evidence such as photographs and accurate transcriptions of what was said to me, and somehow there was such bad dirt on me that there would be no cooperation extended.  No one would tell what it was that was said about me either. I have a theory based on some recently acquired information and contemporary political news. 

I am accused of being "Emotional" when I chastise and order off trespassers and harassers and speak and write about them in a most disparaging manner.    I am not being emotional I am communicating ice cold fact and opinion. 

My ex-wife communicated to Police and lawyers and other persons that I " Hated "  them and women. That is a female emotional motivation. I as a man was not emotionally motivated. In addition, I, a man who ran a business where he did most of the work, sold the business and bought and resurrected a derelict looted while under construction house where he did most of the work  and moved his family in and then paid for and remedied a second home for his family was busy working, was not hanging around brooding and hating. I also smiled a lot so when the Bi-Polar thing first came along our RCMP shrinkies adopted it and labeled me "Manic". RCMP could see that I was always smiling and they could not add the " Depressive". My ex-wife said she would "wipe the smile off of your face" and ran all around saying I was discontented and angry to accomplish that.  IT IS ALL REALLY NUTS.

I complained about or submitted evidence contemporaneously in the Environmental Appeal Board and the Supreme Court of British Columbia and all over the internet and in boxes of copies of letters sent to authorities since 1982 and til recently by e-mail and the he " Hates" prevails I believe still. I have had conversations, hard to prove, but the e-mails in some instances are damning or as I do declare, the produce of mentally ill persons who cannot or will not perceive what is and has happened. The he " hates " canard is from my ex-wife who invented it she said with  her lawyers advice. She declared to me, " I have told them you hate Police Lawyers and Women "  NUTS IT IS ALL SO NUTS.

IT IS NOT TOO LATE.  WE ARE CONTEMPORANEOUS, I DO REMEMBER AND I HAVE DIARIES WHEN  I DID NOT. IT IS TIME TO REMEDY MANY CRIMES FROM THE PAST NOW. PROTECTION IS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

                      NUTS , NUTS , IT  IS  ALL SO  NUTS           

                                                                                

I DO DIGRESS TO EXPRESS POLITICAL INCORRECTNESS

Post mostly deleted.  The remaining sole conclusion would be that the Entitled do take advantage of a certain invulnerability to behave badly. Group acceptance motivates them and energizes them. They and other people and groups feel that the law will not deter them from doing whatever they want to do.  This practice   rationalizes bad behavior.  You do never know how far they will go.

Google Col. Russel Williams  convicted pervert and killer. He is the basis of my cartoon character Russ Russ. Russ was base Commander in the Canadian Air Force and flew the Queen and the Prime Minister around. He danced in women's stolen underwear then graduated to forcible rape.

WATCH 

HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL TO NOT REQUIRE CONSENT FROM ME TOO?

I did not consent to any inheritances to be taken from me nor to be kept secret from me nor did I consent to let my wife take over as financial head of my family. I did not consent to her demand for a 2000 sq. ft. home contractor built. I did not consent to borrow money for me to repay and for my wife to spend on a business adventure. I paid her after she lost everything I owned on her business adventure. She demanded amounts from $7700. to $10,000. on five or six occasions and then $30, 000. I did not consent except the $30,000. as final payment and I certainly did not consent as Betty or Trixie and her lawyer refused to acknowledge payment and were back for more. I did not consent but I was forced to pay extortion payments for debt I did not consent to, thus I did not consent. I was forced to pay my wife unacknowledged payments which she described as blackmail and can you believe me too, I did not consent. ME TOO  I DID NOT CONSENT. HEY, ME TOO.

BACK IN THE SPRING OF 1970 LEONARD KLASSEN AND ME, LINDON, ROLLED UP THE STAIRS INTO A MOTORCYCLE CLUBHOUSE IN A MANSION ON VANCOUVER`S TWELFTH AVENUE AND SHADES OF KAVANAUGH`S LIFE THERE was a lineup of of low lifes preparing to gang rape two young women . 

OH NO THE BIKER SCUM SAID IT IS LINDON. ooh NO LEONARD IS WITH HIM.

DESPITE THE FACT WE JUST ROLLED IN AND THE WOMEN DID NOT SAY ANYTHING WE COULD TELL THAT CONSENT HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN . AS I SCREAMED MY LACK OF CONSENT FOR EVERY ACT OF FINANCIAL OR REPUTATIONAL RAPE WHY DID NO ONE NOTICE ME NOR HEAR WHAT I SAID AND WROTE AND PHONED AND AFFIDAVITED 

WHY IS CONSENT NOT REQUIRED FROM ME TOO. I DID NOT CONSENT.

 

 

HOW CAN IT BE LAWFUL: POLICE ABUSE CITIZENS TO PLEASURE THEMSELVES

I WAS WATCHING THE MOUNTING EVIDENCE THAT KAVANAUGH  WAS LICENTIOUS AND SELF GRATIFYING WHEN INTOXICATED.

THIS REMINDED ME OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH AND HOW SECRECY AND PRIVILEGE CREATED A SANCTUARY FOR PERVERTS. 

I extrapolated as I thought: What other cultures of secrecy and privilege are similar, Police?

THE SELF GRATIFICATION AND NARCISSIST DISREGARD FOR THE SUFFERING CAUSED BY RAPE AND ASSAULT AND OVERPOWERING OF VICTIMS TO OBTAIN PLEASURE IS A COMMON THEME FOR THE ORGANIZED PERVERSION THAT IS EVIDENCED IN OPPORTUNISTIC PARTY RAPERS, PEDOPHILES AND POLICE  WHO ABUSE CITIZENS.

The victims of Rape and domination and abuse by authority do not forget what happened.  There is a neverending apprehension that the damaging actions they suffered will be repeated. The fear is an enhancing feature for rapists and I have seen Law Officers exulting as they terrorized me.

A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION  INTO THE CULTURAL PRACTICES OF NUMEROUS POWERFUL AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS WILL EXPOSE SADISTIC  AND PERVERTED  PRACTICES OF SELF GRATIFICATION  AND DISREGARD FOR THE SUFFERING OF VICTIMS. I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE PRACTICES AND ABUSES OF LAW OFFICERS OR EVERY SORT SHOULD BE FIRST.